菜单
Use when formulating qualitative research questions — open-ended, exploratory, process-oriented questions appropriate for the chosen methodology.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt，粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里，让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
基于 SOC 职业分类
Use when writing academic prose for qualitative research — findings, methods, discussion sections with appropriate voice and conventions.
Use when conducting participatory action research (PAR) involving collaborative inquiry, cycles of action and reflection.
Use when formatting academic work in APA 7th edition style — citations, references, headings, tables, and manuscript structure.
Use when designing or conducting case study research following Yin's multiple case study methodology or Stake's approach.
Use when developing and densifying categories with properties, dimensions, conditions, and consequences.
Use when formatting academic work in Chicago/Turabian style — notes-bibliography or author-date systems.
| name | research-questions |
| description | Use when formulating qualitative research questions — open-ended, exploratory, process-oriented questions appropriate for the chosen methodology. |
Qualitative research questions invite meaning, process, and context. They should be open-ended, non-leading, and aligned with what your methodology can actually deliver.
Classic GT often begins with a broad area of interest rather than a tight hypothesis. Questions should not telegraph expected categories. As theory emerges, questions in later interviews become theoretically sampled to fill analytic gaps.
Central question form often resembles: “What is the lived experience of X?” Follow with probes about essence, embodiment, time, and relationality—aligned with your phenomenological variant (descriptive, interpretive, hermeneutic).
Ask cultural/process questions: What meanings, practices, and norms constitute membership? How is everyday life organized in this setting? How do insiders explain their actions?
Yin-style case studies often ask how/why about a bounded system. Questions should clarify case boundaries (unit of analysis) and the theoretical proposition the case illuminates—without smuggling quantitative causality claims.
Steer away from “How much?”, “How many?”, or “Does X cause Y?” unless you truly have measurement designs. If magnitudes matter, consider mixed methods rather than forcing a qualitative core question into a survey frame.
It is legitimate to revise the research question as the core category emerges. Document the evolution in your audit trail (“initial focus → refined focus after selective coding”). Proposals can present staging: initial orienting question + plan to refine.
Translate the RQ into topic areas and open prompts, not a litany of micro-questions that exhaust participants.
