菜单
Retrieve and format Codacy analysis issues by running `scripts/codacy_issues.py` in the ExStruct workspace. Use when users ask to inspect repository or pull-request Codacy findings, filter by severity, or produce structured issue output for review and fix planning.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt，粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里，让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
基于 SOC 职业分类
Review an ExStruct ADR draft for required sections, status values, evidence quality, supersede links, and balanced consequences. Use when an ADR already exists in draft form and you need findings before review or merge.
Review an ExStruct ADR draft for decision quality, overlap with existing ADRs and specs, evidence strength, rollout risk, and human-ownership escalations. Use only after adr-linter reports no unresolved high/medium findings on the current draft, and when you need design-review findings before merge or handoff.
Use ExStruct CLI to validate, inspect, create, and edit Excel workbooks safely. Trigger when an agent needs `exstruct patch`, `exstruct make`, `exstruct validate`, `exstruct ops list`, or `exstruct ops describe`, especially for create-vs-edit decisions, dry-run workflows, backend constraints, or safe workbook-edit guidance.
Maintain ExStruct ADR index artifacts by scanning ADR files and synchronizing README, index.yaml, and decision-map.md metadata. Use when ADRs are added, updated, superseded, or reclassified and the repository needs a refreshed ADR map for humans and AI agents.
Audit ExStruct ADRs against current specs, tests, and source code to detect policy drift, missing ADR updates, stale references, and evidence gaps. Use after merges, during periodic ADR audits, or when a review suspects that implementation and ADRs have diverged.
Draft a new ExStruct ADR or propose an update to an existing ADR from an issue, PR, diff, tests, and specs. Use when an ADR is required or recommended and you need a structured draft with context, decision, consequences, and evidence.
| name | codacy-issues-fetcher |
| description | Retrieve and format Codacy analysis issues by running `scripts/codacy_issues.py` in the ExStruct workspace. Use when users ask to inspect repository or pull-request Codacy findings, filter by severity, or produce structured issue output for review and fix planning. |
Run scripts/codacy_issues.py as the primary interface to Codacy issue retrieval.
Avoid reimplementing API calls unless the script itself must be changed.
scripts/codacy_issues.py is reachable.CODACY_API_TOKEN is set and valid.org and repo if user provides them; otherwise rely on Git origin auto-detection.--pr.--pr <number>.--min-level): Error, High, Warning, Info.--provider): gh, gl, bb (default is effectively gh).# Repository issues (explicit target)
python scripts/codacy_issues.py <org> <repo> --provider gh --min-level Warning
# Pull request issues (explicit target)
python scripts/codacy_issues.py <org> <repo> --pr <number> --provider gh --min-level Warning
# Pull request issues (auto-detect org/repo from git origin)
python scripts/codacy_issues.py --pr <number> --min-level Warning
scope, organization, repository, pullRequest, minLevel, total, issues.issues entries are formatted as:
<level> | <file_path>:<line_no> | <rule> | <category> | <message>HTTP 401 / Unauthorized: token invalid or missing permissions. Ask user to set or refresh CODACY_API_TOKEN.CODACY_API_TOKEN is not set: export the environment variable before retrying.Invalid --provider: use only gh, gl, or bb.Invalid org/repo/pr): sanitize input and rerun.--min-level, state that explicitly.