一键导入
technical-writing
Write clear, engaging technical content from real experience. Use when writing blog posts, documentation, tutorials, or technical articles.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
菜单
Write clear, engaging technical content from real experience. Use when writing blog posts, documentation, tutorials, or technical articles.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
基于 SOC 职业分类
WCAG 2.2 compliance testing, screen reader validation, and inclusive design verification. Use when ensuring legal compliance (ADA, Section 508), testing for disabilities, or building accessible applications for 1 billion disabled users globally.
AI agents as force multipliers for quality work. Core skill for all 19 QE agents using PACT principles.
Comprehensive API testing patterns including contract testing, REST/GraphQL testing, and integration testing. Use when testing APIs or designing API test strategies.
Unvarnished technical criticism combining Linus Torvalds' precision, Gordon Ramsay's standards, and James Bach's BS-detection. Use when code/tests need harsh reality checks, certification schemes smell fishy, or technical decisions lack rigor. No sugar-coating, just surgical truth about what's broken and why.
Write high-quality bug reports that get fixed quickly. Use when reporting bugs, training teams on bug reporting, or establishing bug report standards.
Chaos engineering principles, controlled failure injection, resilience testing, and system recovery validation. Use when testing distributed systems, building confidence in fault tolerance, or validating disaster recovery.
| name | technical-writing |
| description | Write clear, engaging technical content from real experience. Use when writing blog posts, documentation, tutorials, or technical articles. |
| category | communication |
| priority | medium |
| tokenEstimate | 800 |
| agents | ["qe-quality-analyzer","qe-api-contract-validator"] |
| implementation_status | optimized |
| optimization_version | 1 |
| last_optimized | "2025-12-03T00:00:00.000Z" |
| dependencies | [] |
| quick_reference_card | true |
| tags | ["writing","documentation","communication","blogs","tutorials"] |
<default_to_action> When writing technical content:
Blog Post Structure:
# Title (specific promise)
## Opening (2-3 paragraphs)
- Hook: The problem or insight
- Context: Why this matters
- Promise: What they'll learn
## Body (3-5 sections)
- One clear idea per section
- Support with examples/code/data
## Closing
- Key takeaway (1-2 sentences)
- Action reader can take
Before/After: ❌ "We implemented a comprehensive testing strategy..." ✅ "We moved exploratory testing into sprint planning. QE now pairs with devs during story refinement." </default_to_action>
| Principle | Bad | Good |
|---|---|---|
| Lead with value | "In today's landscape..." | "Here's how we cut bugs 60%" |
| Show, don't tell | "We improved testing" | "Bug detection: 12→47 per sprint" |
| Be specific | "Performance improved" | "Response time: 2.3s→180ms" |
| Honest trade-offs | "This approach is best" | "TDD slowed velocity 20%, reduced bugs 75%" |
| Kill | Reason |
|---|---|
| basically, actually, probably | Hedge words |
| leverage, synergy, paradigm | Corporate speak |
| very, really, quite | Unnecessary qualifiers |
| it should be noted that | Just note it |
Before publishing:
Before: "We decided to implement a more comprehensive testing strategy that would allow us to catch bugs earlier in the development lifecycle."
After: "We moved exploratory testing into sprint planning. QE now pairs with devs during story refinement, identifying risks before code is written."
Before: "The benefits of this approach are numerous and include improved quality, faster feedback loops, and better team collaboration."
After: "Three outcomes: bugs found 2 days earlier on average, 30% fewer regression issues, and devs now ask QE for input during design."
// Generate documentation from code
const docs = await Task("Generate Docs", {
source: 'src/services/PaymentService.ts',
format: 'markdown',
includeExamples: true
}, "qe-quality-analyzer");
// Review documentation quality
const review = await Task("Review Docs", {
files: ['README.md', 'docs/api.md'],
checkClarity: true,
checkCodeExamples: true
}, "qe-quality-analyzer");
aqe/technical-writing/
├── generated-docs/* - Auto-generated documentation
├── reviews/* - Documentation review findings
└── templates/* - Reusable doc templates
const docsFleet = await FleetManager.coordinate({
strategy: 'documentation',
agents: [
'qe-quality-analyzer', // Generate and review
'qe-api-contract-validator' // API doc accuracy
],
topology: 'sequential'
});
You're not writing to impress. You're writing to help people solve problems you've already solved. Be the colleague you wish you'd had.
Write from experience. Only write about what you've done in production. If exploring, say so.