Skip to main content

technical-writing

Write clear, engaging technical content from real experience. Use when writing blog posts, documentation, tutorials, or technical articles.

Informations de source

Dépôt
proffesor-for-testing/sentinel-api-testing
Dernière activité de la source
8 décembre 2025 à 14:35
Langue détectée de SKILL.md
anglais
Étoiles
46
Forks
13

Options d'installation

Le prompt qui vérifie d'abord la source est sélectionné par défaut. Vous pouvez passer à une commande directe ou télécharger une copie locale.

Vérifiez les fichiers source

Lisez SKILL.md et les fichiers associés affichés par SkillsMP avant de décider de l'installer.

Affichage de SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Instructions source · Aperçu en lecture seule
name
technical-writing
description
Write clear, engaging technical content from real experience. Use when writing blog posts, documentation, tutorials, or technical articles.
category
communication
priority
medium
tokenEstimate
800
agents
["qe-quality-analyzer","qe-api-contract-validator"]
implementation_status
optimized
optimization_version
1
last_optimized
2025-12-03T00:00:00.000Z
dependencies
[]
quick_reference_card
true
tags
["writing","documentation","communication","blogs","tutorials"]
# Technical Writing <default_to_action> When writing technical content: 1. LEAD with value (what will reader learn/gain?) 2. SHOW, don't tell (specific examples, code, numbers) 3. STRUCTURE for scanning (headers, bold, short paragraphs) 4. CUT ruthlessly (every sentence must earn its place) 5. BE honest about trade-offs **Blog Post Structure:** ```markdown # Title (specific promise) ## Opening (2-3 paragraphs) - Hook: The problem or insight - Context: Why this matters - Promise: What they'll learn ## Body (3-5 sections) - One clear idea per section - Support with examples/code/data ## Closing - Key takeaway (1-2 sentences) - Action reader can take ``` **Before/After:** ❌ "We implemented a comprehensive testing strategy..." ✅ "We moved exploratory testing into sprint planning. QE now pairs with devs during story refinement." </default_to_action> ## Quick Reference Card ### Core Principles | Principle | Bad | Good | |-----------|-----|------| | **Lead with value** | "In today's landscape..." | "Here's how we cut bugs 60%" | | **Show, don't tell** | "We improved testing" | "Bug detection: 12→47 per sprint" | | **Be specific** | "Performance improved" | "Response time: 2.3s→180ms" | | **Honest trade-offs** | "This approach is best" | "TDD slowed velocity 20%, reduced bugs 75%" | ### Words to Cut | Kill | Reason | |------|--------| | basically, actually, probably | Hedge words | | leverage, synergy, paradigm | Corporate speak | | very, really, quite | Unnecessary qualifiers | | it should be noted that | Just note it | --- ## Audience-Specific Writing ### For Developers - Lead with code or concrete problem - Show implementation details - Discuss trade-offs and alternatives - Link to repos or examples ### For QA/QE - Start with testing challenge - Show strategy, not just tools - Include risk assessment - Provide adaptable heuristics ### For Leadership - Open with business impact - Use metrics that matter - Connect technical to outcomes - Keep technical details concise --- ## Editing Checklist Before publishing: - [ ] Title promises something specific - [ ] Opening hooks in 30 seconds - [ ] Claims backed by examples - [ ] All unnecessary words cut - [ ] Code examples tested and correct - [ ] Takeaway crystal clear - [ ] Would send to respected colleague --- ## Example Transformations **Before:** "We decided to implement a more comprehensive testing strategy that would allow us to catch bugs earlier in the development lifecycle." **After:** "We moved exploratory testing into sprint planning. QE now pairs with devs during story refinement, identifying risks before code is written." --- **Before:** "The benefits of this approach are numerous and include improved quality, faster feedback loops, and better team collaboration." **After:** "Three outcomes: bugs found 2 days earlier on average, 30% fewer regression issues, and devs now ask QE for input during design." --- ## Agent Integration ```typescript // Generate documentation from code const docs = await Task("Generate Docs", { source: 'src/services/PaymentService.ts', format: 'markdown', includeExamples: true }, "qe-quality-analyzer"); // Review documentation quality const review = await Task("Review Docs", { files: ['README.md', 'docs/api.md'], checkClarity: true, checkCodeExamples: true }, "qe-quality-analyzer"); ``` --- ## Agent Coordination Hints ### Memory Namespace ``` aqe/technical-writing/ ├── generated-docs/* - Auto-generated documentation ├── reviews/* - Documentation review findings └── templates/* - Reusable doc templates ``` ### Fleet Coordination ```typescript const docsFleet = await FleetManager.coordinate({ strategy: 'documentation', agents: [ 'qe-quality-analyzer', // Generate and review 'qe-api-contract-validator' // API doc accuracy ], topology: 'sequential' }); ``` --- ## Related Skills - [bug-reporting-excellence](../bug-reporting-excellence/) - Technical bug writing - [code-review-quality](../code-review-quality/) - Review documentation --- ## Remember **You're not writing to impress.** You're writing to help people solve problems you've already solved. Be the colleague you wish you'd had. **Write from experience.** Only write about what you've done in production. If exploring, say so.
Voir sur GitHub