questdb

Validate and fix pasted QuestDB pull-request review findings one at a time, with claim verification, a failing regression test where feasible, robust and performant implementation, testing, and an independent review/fix loop. Use when the user pastes Critical, Moderate, or other actionable PR review items.

Validate and fix pasted QuestDB pull-request review findings one at a time, with claim verification, a failing regression test where feasible, robust and performant implementation, testing, and an independent review/fix loop. Use when Codex is asked to fix Critical, Moderate, or other actionable PR review items.

Validate and fix a pasted list of QuestDB pull-request review findings. Use when the user pastes Critical, Moderate, or other actionable review items and wants each claim reproduced where feasible, fixed for correctness and performance, tested, and independently reviewed in a serial review/fix loop.

Review a GitHub pull request against QuestDB coding standards

Review GitHub pull requests against QuestDB coding standards using gh, local source inspection, review levels 0-3, and verified Critical, Moderate, Minor, and Downgraded findings. Use when Codex is asked to review a PR number or URL, run review-pr, inspect a GitHub PR, validate PR metadata, analyze diffs and callsites, or perform a QuestDB blocking code review.

Review a GitHub pull request against QuestDB coding standards. Use when asked to review a PR, given a PR number or URL, optionally with a review level 0..3. Performs an adversarial, blocking, mission-critical code review.

Approve the pull request for the currently checked-out branch. Posts the review from this conversation as an approving review and adds the "QUEUED FOR MERGE" label. Use after review-pr when you decide to approve.

Reject the pull request for the currently checked-out branch. Posts the review from this conversation as a change-request review that tags the PR author, sets the PR to "changes requested", and clears the READY label. Use after review-pr when you decide to reject.

Approve the pull request for the currently checked-out branch. Posts the review from this conversation as an approving review and adds the "QUEUED FOR MERGE" label. Use after review-pr when you decide to approve.

Reject the pull request for the currently checked-out branch. Posts the review from this conversation as a change-request review that tags the PR author, sets the PR to "changes requested", and clears the READY label. Use after review-pr when you decide to reject.

Review a GitHub pull request against QuestDB coding standards. Use when asked to review a PR (by number or URL), optionally with a depth level 0..3. Performs an adversarial, blocking, mission-critical code review covering correctness, concurrency, zero-GC performance, resource management, cross-repo tandem test coverage (OSS / Enterprise / e2e-python), test efficacy, test-code quality, and QuestDB conventions, then verifies every finding against source before reporting.

Review a GitHub pull request against QuestDB coding standards. Performs an adversarial, blocking, mission-critical code review covering correctness, concurrency, performance, resource management, test coverage, test efficacy, test-code quality, and QuestDB conventions, then verifies every finding against source before reporting.

Review a GitHub pull request against QuestDB client library coding standards. Use when asked to review a PR, given a PR number or URL, optionally with a review level 0..3. Performs an adversarial, blocking, mission-critical code review.

Review a GitHub pull request against QuestDB client library coding standards

Review a code change against QuestDB Web Console coding standards

Review a code change (PR, commit, or staged/unstaged diff) against QuestDB Web Console coding standards. Use when asked to review a PR or diff, given a PR number or URL, a commit hash, or `staged`/`unstaged`, optionally with a review level 0..3. Performs an adversarial, blocking, mission-critical frontend code review.

Review QuestDB documentation pull requests for placement, discoverability, dual-audience (human + LLM) quality, example coverage, and SQL syntax diagrams. Use when reviewing a docs PR, a new or changed page, or assessing whether documentation is findable, correct, and usable by both engineers and LLMs that build systems against QuestDB.

Create, review, and improve QuestDB documentation pages. Covers SQL reference, guides, cookbook recipes, syntax blocks, examples, page structure, and quality checks. Use when writing new docs, reviewing existing pages, adding examples, or restructuring content in the questdb/documentation repo (used both standalone and as a submodule of questdb.io).

Review a GitHub pull request against the go-questdb-client coding standards

Review a GitHub pull request against QuestDB client library coding standards

Run full TSBS (Time Series Benchmark Suite) benchmarks against QuestDB in Docker, including prerequisite checks, TSBS build, data generation, loading, query generation, and benchmark execution. Use when asked to set up or run QuestDB TSBS performance tests end-to-end.

Review a code change against the QuestDB MCP Bridge coding standards