菜单
Run a factual, staff-level review of a local branch, diff, repo, directory, or file. Use for code review, deep review, review-my-changes, or staff-review requests.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt，粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里，让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
基于 SOC 职业分类
Compare Claude Code and Codex on the same real code-change task with isolated worktrees, identical gates, transcripts, time, and cost.
Align AGENTS.md, rules, README, plans, and chronicles with the codebase; use --clean to archive obsolete task docs into ATLAS.md.
Research current best practices and turn the evidence into a clear recommendation. Use for state-of-the-art, evidence-based, optimal-approach, comparison, or pros-and-cons questions in any field.
Clarify an ambiguous or consequential change before planning or implementation when more than one sound approach exists.
Add CHANGELOG.md entries, derive them from commits, or cut a Keep a Changelog and SemVer release.
Create a user-requested Conventional Commit from the staged changes.
| name | staff-review |
| description | Run a factual, staff-level review of a local branch, diff, repo, directory, or file. Use for code review, deep review, review-my-changes, or staff-review requests. |
| user-invocable | true |
| effort | max |
Resolve the requested scope. With no explicit scope, review the current branch changes; if none exist, ask what to review.
Dispatch development-skills:staff-reviewer with the scope, relevant requirement or spec, related plan and chronicle if present, project standards, and verification evidence. The reviewer must inspect the diff before reading those materials, check the specification before quality, and report only supported findings.
Relay its factual verdict unchanged. Research only when it can settle a material doubt.
