メニュー
Run a factual, staff-level review of a local branch, diff, repo, directory, or file. Use for code review, deep review, review-my-changes, or staff-review requests.
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
Compare Claude Code and Codex on the same real code-change task with isolated worktrees, identical gates, transcripts, time, and cost.
Align AGENTS.md, rules, README, plans, and chronicles with the codebase; use --clean to archive obsolete task docs into ATLAS.md.
Research current best practices and turn the evidence into a clear recommendation. Use for state-of-the-art, evidence-based, optimal-approach, comparison, or pros-and-cons questions in any field.
Clarify an ambiguous or consequential change before planning or implementation when more than one sound approach exists.
Add CHANGELOG.md entries, derive them from commits, or cut a Keep a Changelog and SemVer release.
Create a user-requested Conventional Commit from the staged changes.
SOC 職業分類に基づく
| name | staff-review |
| description | Run a factual, staff-level review of a local branch, diff, repo, directory, or file. Use for code review, deep review, review-my-changes, or staff-review requests. |
| user-invocable | true |
| effort | max |
Resolve the requested scope. With no explicit scope, review the current branch changes; if none exist, ask what to review.
Dispatch development-skills:staff-reviewer with the scope, relevant requirement or spec, related plan and chronicle if present, project standards, and verification evidence. The reviewer must inspect the diff before reading those materials, check the specification before quality, and report only supported findings.
Relay its factual verdict unchanged. Research only when it can settle a material doubt.
