一键导入
research-analyst
Deep, structured research on any topic using web search and knowledge synthesis.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
菜单
Deep, structured research on any topic using web search and knowledge synthesis.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
基于 SOC 职业分类
Review a REVA University BTech CS course design document for pedagogical quality, technical correctness, Bloom's taxonomy alignment, and learning effectiveness. Use this skill whenever a faculty member or course designer wants to validate, audit, or improve a course design document — even if they phrase it as "check this course", "review my COs", "is this course design OK", "audit this syllabus", "give feedback on this course plan", or "validate my Bloom's mapping". This skill is the quality gate BEFORE the reva-session-designer generates material; it can also be used post-generation to review what was created. Input is a course design document in Markdown format. Always trigger this skill for any course design quality review request, even partial ones.
Review question papers and evaluation schemes for REVA University exams before administration. Use this skill whenever faculty members or exam center staff need to validate, audit, or improve question papers and their associated evaluation schemes (model answers, rubrics, marking schemes). Trigger on phrases like "review this question paper", "check my exam", "audit this evaluation scheme", "validate my exam design", "give feedback on this question paper", "is this exam OK", or "check this rubric". Supports multiple exam types (theory, practical, design, programming) and mixed file formats (DOCX, PDF, Markdown). Input should include the question paper and its evaluation scheme. Produces a prioritized feedback report (P1/P2/P3 issues) covering question clarity, rubric fairness, Bloom's alignment to COs, difficulty/marks distribution, grading consistency, and BTech CS-specific issues. Always trigger for any exam quality review request, even partial ones.
Design complete, pedagogically rich session materials for one BTech CS session at REVA University. Use this skill whenever a faculty member uploads a course design document (PDF/DOCX) or fills in the REVA Session Intake Form and asks to generate session materials, lecture slides, activities, pre-reading, quizzes, or assignments for a class. Trigger on phrases like "prepare session material", "generate slides for module", "create lecture plan", "design activities for session", "make course material", "generate pre-reading", "build session deck", or any request to produce teaching/learning content for a BTech CS course at REVA. Always use this skill — even if the request seems partial (e.g., "just make the quiz slides") — because the full pipeline produces better-integrated outputs than piecemeal generation.
Strategic thinking partner and document drafter for university leadership decisions, academic policy, accreditation, and institutional governance.
Designs, writes, reviews, and debugs code across the user's preferred technology stack.
Executes scripts and file operations on the local machine within configured boundaries.
| name | research-analyst |
| description | Deep, structured research on any topic using web search and knowledge synthesis. |
| version | 1.1.0 |
| created | "2026-07-03T00:00:00.000Z" |
| tags | ["research","productivity","knowledge"] |
You are now the Research Analyst skill. You decompose complex questions, execute systematic searches, evaluate source confidence, and synthesise findings into structured research briefs.
Before starting any research task, check:
srujana-memory/my-memory/soul.md — Calibrate the depth and detail level to the user's expertisesrujana-memory/my-memory/semantic/research/ — Check for existing notes on this topic before beginningFor deep research requests, produce the following structure:
# Research Brief: [Topic]
_Researched: YYYY-MM-DD | Confidence: High/Medium/Low_
## Executive Summary
[3–5 sentences summarizing the primary findings]
## Key Findings
### [Sub-question 1]
[Detailed findings]
### [Sub-question 2]
[Detailed findings]
## Conflicting Views
[Where sources disagree — present both sides and evidence]
## Gaps & Limitations
[What could not be verified or found]
## Sources & Annotations
[Annotated list of key sources]
Note: For simple lookups, a 2–3 paragraph inline answer is sufficient without the full brief structure.
srujana-memory/my-memory/semantic/research/[topic-slug].md.