用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
直接命令不会经过审查 Prompt;运行前请先检查来源。
npx skills add https://github.com/yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine --skill inductive-hypothesis-generation命令会保持在同一行。复制前请横向滚动并检查完整内容。
想先保存到本地?可下载 SkillsMP 当前能够提供的文件。
Strategy: Dialectic engine retuned for truth-seeking, not survival. A defender steelmans a claim into its MOST falsifiable form, a critic attacks to refute it, a judge classifies the exchange into BROKEN/CORROBORATED/UNFALSIFIABLE — the judge does NOT pick a winner or score persuasiveness. Methods: Irving debate (repurposed), Toulmin argumentation, Mayo severe testing.
Campaign: Logical extreme and boundary testing via reductio ad absurdum and edge-case analysis. Core question: Does this artifact collapse under logical limits and boundary conditions? Methods: Lakatos 1976, Dutilh Novaes 2016, BVA, Flyvbjerg Critical Case, Popper.
Campaign for mapping argument structures — extract claims, link evidence, assess strength, synthesize positions. Produces argument graphs in the wiki vault.
基于 SOC 职业分类
正在显示 SKILL.md
| name | inductive-hypothesis-generation |
| description | Strategy: induce and distill hypotheses from data/observations |
| version | 1.0.0 |
| category | hypothesis-formation |
| type | strategy |
| campaign | hypothesis-formulation |
| tactics | ["anomaly-driven-abduction","falsifiability-audit"] |
| sops | ["anomaly-characterization","explanation-generation","variable-identification","relationship-specification","falsifiability-check"] |
| dependencies | {"tactics":["anomaly-driven-abduction","falsifiability-audit"],"sops":["hypothesis-formation-variable-identification","relationship-specification"]} |
Induce and distill hypotheses from data/observations: in domains with theoretical gaps or insufficient theory, distill regularities from empirical patterns and cautiously generalize them into testable propositions.
Not applicable: domains that already have a clear theoretical framework → use deductive-hypothesis-generation instead.
Observe patterns → Extract regularity → Generalize cautiously → Formulate testable claim
The core logic of induction:
The core risk of induction: over-generalization (jumping from a limited sample to a universal law). Each inductive hypothesis must make explicit:
| Tier | Pattern coverage | Regularity extraction | Hypothesis yield | Generalization boundary |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| S | ≥3 independent observation patterns | ≥2 regularities | ≥2 structured hypotheses | Each hypothesis specifies its sample source |
| M | ≥5 independent observation patterns | ≥3 regularities | ≥3 structured hypotheses | Generalization boundary + falsification scenario |
| L | ≥8 independent observation patterns | ≥5 regularities | ≥4 structured hypotheses | Complete generalization boundary + comparison of competing regularities |
anomaly-characterization SOP: systematically organize the patterns in existing observations/data (including frequency, conditions, exceptions)explanation-generation SOP (via the anomaly-driven-abduction tactic): generate candidate regularity explanations for each patternvariable-identification SOP: turn the constructs in the regularities into operationalizable variablesrelationship-specification SOP: specify the directional relationships between variables (including moderating conditions)falsifiability-check SOP (via the falsifiability-audit tactic): generate a falsification scenario + generalization boundary for each hypothesisRecord after each round:
Optional, no fixed order; the final leaf is always a sop.
| Tactic | When to use |
|---|---|
| anomaly-driven-abduction | Tactic: Inductive/abductive path — describe anomalous phenomena, generate candidate explanations, rank by plausibility |
| falsifiability-audit | Tactic: hypothesis quality assurance — check falsifiability, repair failing hypotheses, complete operationalization and boundary-condition specification |
Optional, no fixed order; the final leaf is always a sop.
| SOP | When to use |
|---|---|
| hypothesis-formation-variable-identification | SOP: identify variables and their roles within a hypothesis |
| relationship-specification | SOP: specify the direction and form of relationships between variables |