一键导入
artifact-detection
Detect annotation artifacts and shortcuts in benchmarks
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
菜单
Detect annotation artifacts and shortcuts in benchmarks
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
基于 SOC 职业分类
SOTA Performance Baseline Campaign — 5 strategies for systematically collecting, standardizing, and analyzing performance data across methods. Produces standardized comparison tables, progress curves, and headroom analysis.
Assess systematic biases in the evidence body — publication bias, reporting bias, and selective outcome reporting. Budget: 40 studies, 40 effect sizes, 40 web searches.
Track evidence accumulation over time — cumulative meta-analysis protocol design. Budget: 40 studies, 40 effect sizes, 30 web searches.
Design structured data extraction form for systematic meta-analysis data collection
Systematically extract effect sizes and conditions from papers for meta-analytic synthesis
Determine effect size types and calculation methods for meta-analytic synthesis
| name | artifact-detection |
| description | Detect annotation artifacts and shortcuts in benchmarks |
| execution | tactic |
| used-by | benchmark-archaeology |
Systematically probe benchmarks for annotation artifacts, dataset shortcuts, and spurious correlations that allow models to achieve high scores without the intended capability.
Search literature for evidence that partial-input baselines achieve unexpectedly high performance:
Search queries: "[benchmark] annotation artifacts", "[benchmark] hypothesis only", "[benchmark] spurious correlations", "[benchmark] dataset bias"
If published partial-input results exist, record performance gap between partial and full input. Gap < 10 points above random indicates severe artifacts.
Identify whether contrast sets or adversarial evaluations exist:
Record performance drops on contrast sets. Drops > 20 points indicate reliance on surface patterns.
Search for evidence of format sensitivity:
Record whether minor format changes cause disproportionate score changes.
Aggregate evidence into artifact severity assessment:
| Severity | Criteria |
|---|---|
| Critical | Partial-input baseline within 5 points of full model |
| High | Contrast set drop >20 points OR format sensitivity >10 points |
| Medium | Known artifacts documented but partial mitigations exist |
| Low | Minor artifacts, full-input still required for high performance |
| None | No evidence of artifacts (may indicate insufficient probing) |
artifact_report:
benchmark: string
overall_severity: critical|high|medium|low|none
partial_input_baselines:
- input_type: string # e.g., "hypothesis only"
performance: float
full_model_performance: float
gap: float
source: string
contrast_set_results:
- contrast_set: string
original_performance: float
contrast_performance: float
drop: float
source: string
format_sensitivity:
- manipulation: string
score_range: string
source: string
shortcuts_identified:
- shortcut: string
mechanism: string
exploitability: high|medium|low
evidence_completeness: thorough|partial|minimal
| Metric | Minimum |
|---|---|
| Literature sources checked | 5 |
| Artifact categories probed | 3 |
| Evidence items collected | 4 |
| Severity classification produced | 1 |