一键导入
review-response
Use when the user receives peer review comments and wants a rebuttal, response letter, point-by-point reply, or evidence-backed revision response.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
菜单
Use when the user receives peer review comments and wants a rebuttal, response letter, point-by-point reply, or evidence-backed revision response.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
基于 SOC 职业分类
Use when the user wants to install, configure, diagnose, or troubleshoot ScholarAIO, including setup check, dependency status, API keys, and bilingual setup flow.
Use when the user explicitly asks for Nature Skills, nature-skills, Nature style, Nature-style, Nature Communications, Nature-family, CNS, high-impact journal, or Springer Nature workflows, including Nature figure work, polishing, writing, reviewer critique, high-impact journal major revision response, Nature/CNS citations, Nature data-sharing workflows, paper readers, reviewer response, paper-to-PPT, submission checklist, or Nature-specific academic-search workflows.
Use when the user wants to rebuild or refresh ScholarAIO keyword, full-text, FTS5, FAISS, or semantic search indexes after data or metadata changes.
Use when the user wants to find academic papers, search the local library, run keyword or semantic search, search by author, explore topics, or federate across library, explore databases, and arXiv.
Use when the user wants to import papers from Endnote XML/RIS, Zotero Web API or local SQLite, attach PDFs, match PDFs to records, or supplement records with PDF content.
Use when the user wants to process new papers, patents, theses, documents, or proceedings from inbox queues into the knowledge base, run the ingest pipeline, or rebuild indexes.
| name | review-response |
| description | Use when the user receives peer review comments and wants a rebuttal, response letter, point-by-point reply, or evidence-backed revision response. |
逐条回复审稿人意见,从工作区文献和原稿中定位支撑证据。
用户需提供:
将审稿意见拆分为独立的 comment,分类标注:
对每条意见:
scholaraio show 查看论文(已有 notes.md 笔记会自动展示),复用已有发现scholaraio ws search <name> "<审稿人关注的关键词>"
scholaraio show <paper-id> --layer 3 # 读结论找证据
scholaraio show <paper-id> --layer 4 # 必要时读全文
scholaraio refs "<id>" # 相关论文的参考文献
scholaraio usearch "<补充关键词>" # 全库搜索(工作区外)
每条回复的结构:
> **Reviewer X, Comment N:** [原文引用]
**Response:** [回复正文]
[如有修改] **Revision:** We have revised Section X.X as follows: "..." (Page X, Line X)
回复策略:
多模态辅助:
images/)重新分析workspace/<name>/response-letter.mdscholaraio show "<paper-id>" --append-notes "## YYYY-MM-DD | <workspace> | review-response
- 关键发现"
scholaraio ws add <name> <paper-id>
/citation-check 检查回复信中新增或改动过的 author-year 引用用户说:"审稿意见回来了,帮我写 response letter" → 解析意见,分类标注,逐条在工作区中找证据,撰写回复
用户说:"Reviewer 2 说我的方法跟 Smith (2023) 没区别,怎么回" → 在工作区中找到 Smith (2023),对比方法差异,起草有理有据的反驳