一键在 Manus 中运行任何 Skill

research-synthesizer

Use when the user has multiple research sources on a topic and wants genuine synthesis of themes, contradictions, and gaps — not separate summaries. Triggers include "synthesize this research", "compare these sources", "research synthesis".

在 Manus 中运行

概览

安装命令

npx skills add https://github.com/codejunkie99/prompt-skills --skill research-synthesizer

复制此命令并粘贴到 Claude Code 中以安装该技能

来源

codejunkie99/prompt-skills

星标15

分支1

更新时间2026年4月26日 10:50

SKILL.md

readonly

name	research-synthesizer
description	Use when the user has multiple research sources on a topic and wants genuine synthesis of themes, contradictions, and gaps — not separate summaries. Triggers include "synthesize this research", "compare these sources", "research synthesis".

Research Synthesizer

When the user supplies multiple sources on a topic, produce true synthesis: themes, contradictions, gaps, and confident conclusions.

Variables

[TOPIC]
<source_1>, <source_2>, <source_3> — sources to synthesize

Prompt Template

I have gathered research from multiple sources on [TOPIC]:

<source_1>[PASTE OR SUMMARIZE]</source_1> <source_2>[PASTE OR SUMMARIZE]</source_2> <source_3>[PASTE OR SUMMARIZE]</source_3>

Synthesize:

Key themes across all sources (what do they agree on?)
Contradictions (where do sources disagree? who is more credible and why?)
Gaps (what questions remain unanswered?)
The 3 most important conclusions I can confidently draw
What I should research next to strengthen my understanding

Do not just summarize each source separately. I want genuine SYNTHESIS — connections and patterns across sources that are not obvious from reading them individually.

同仓库更多 Skills

同仓库

apology-crafter

codejunkie99/prompt-skills

Use when the user wants to craft a sincere, accountable apology in both written and spoken versions, without deflection. Triggers include "draft an apology", "how should I apologize", "say sorry to".

2026-04-2615

difficult-conversation-prep

codejunkie99/prompt-skills

Use when the user wants to prepare for a hard conversation with empathetic-but-direct opening, defensiveness handling, and resolution paths. Triggers include "difficult conversation", "hard talk", "tough conversation prep".

2026-04-2615

elevator-pitch-builder

codejunkie99/prompt-skills

Use when the user wants three energy-level variants of an elevator pitch (bold, conversational, data-driven). Triggers include "elevator pitch", "pitch this product", "30 second pitch".

2026-04-2615

feedback-giver

codejunkie99/prompt-skills

Use when the user wants to draft spoken feedback using observation/impact/expectation/support framework. Triggers include "give feedback", "feedback to my report", "performance feedback".

2026-04-2615

presentation-outliner

codejunkie99/prompt-skills

Use when the user wants a tight presentation outline with hook, problem, solution, evidence, objection handling, and clear CTA. Triggers include "outline a presentation", "talk outline", "structure my pitch deck".

2026-04-2615

data-interpreter

codejunkie99/prompt-skills

Use when the user wants plain-English interpretation of a dataset including patterns, surprises, and misleading aspects. Triggers include "analyze this data", "interpret these numbers", "what does this data mean".

2026-04-2615

来源

codejunkie99

codejunkie99/prompt-skills

打开 GitHub 仓库查看创作者相关仓库

安装命令

下载

在 Manus 中运行

适用职业SOC

其他社会科学家及相关工作者生命、物理与社会科学类职业19-3099L4

name	research-synthesizer
description	Use when the user has multiple research sources on a topic and wants genuine synthesis of themes, contradictions, and gaps — not separate summaries. Triggers include "synthesize this research", "compare these sources", "research synthesis".

Research Synthesizer

When the user supplies multiple sources on a topic, produce true synthesis: themes, contradictions, gaps, and confident conclusions.

Variables

[TOPIC]
<source_1>, <source_2>, <source_3> — sources to synthesize

Prompt Template

I have gathered research from multiple sources on [TOPIC]:

<source_1>[PASTE OR SUMMARIZE]</source_1> <source_2>[PASTE OR SUMMARIZE]</source_2> <source_3>[PASTE OR SUMMARIZE]</source_3>

Synthesize:

Key themes across all sources (what do they agree on?)
Contradictions (where do sources disagree? who is more credible and why?)
Gaps (what questions remain unanswered?)
The 3 most important conclusions I can confidently draw
What I should research next to strengthen my understanding

Do not just summarize each source separately. I want genuine SYNTHESIS — connections and patterns across sources that are not obvious from reading them individually.