القائمة
Reflect on the current conversation — analyze mistakes, missed opportunities, and plan improvements for future conversations.
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
استنادا إلى تصنيف SOC المهني
Use when someone is about to lose access to a machine (shared server, lab box, cloud/VM instance, expiring rental) and needs to preserve all their work before it's gone. Systematically finds everything that exists ONLY on that machine — unpushed commits, stashes, untracked/uncommitted files, dirty submodules, non-git dirs, loose files, and large gitignored artifacts — and backs it up to GitHub / HuggingFace / an off-machine archive, non-destructively. Triggers on "losing access to this machine", "back up everything before I lose the server", "migrating off this box", "decommission", "my instance expires".
Use when preparing a paper's camera-ready or arXiv release — de-anonymizing an accepted submission, packaging an arXiv tarball, checking dual-submission safety against a concurrent venue (e.g. a paper accepted at a workshop that's also under review at NeurIPS/ICML), or flagging reviewer-requested post-review additions. Encodes a byte-identity discipline (the public version changes ONLY author/venue metadata, never content), a numbers-from-scripts integrity gate, and the arXiv mechanics that actually bite.
Spin up one or more fresh-context subagents to critically evaluate a proposed theory, hypothesis, interpretation, or experimental design before committing to it. Use when the user says "have an agent critique this" / "get a second opinion on" / "is this design sound" / invokes /critique, or proactively before running any experiment or committing to a non-trivial theoretical claim.
Use when launching a multi-hour neural-network training, fine-tune, or other long GPU job autonomously from Claude Code and you need to catch failures (NaN, stuck-at-chance, dead process, throughput collapse, OOM) early instead of waking up to a wasted GPU window.
Use when the user asks to check, audit, or improve a website or web project for accessibility (a11y), WCAG compliance, screen reader support, keyboard navigation, color contrast, or alt text. Triggers a plan-mode investigation against the TeachAccess design and code checklists, then implements approved fixes.
Consolidate scattered research notes, logs, experiment outputs, and submodule docs into a single living research paper. Use when the user wants to pull together multiple source documents into one structured paper.
| name | reflect |
| description | Reflect on the current conversation — analyze mistakes, missed opportunities, and plan improvements for future conversations. |
Pause and reflect honestly on this conversation. Analyze the following dimensions, skipping any that don't apply:
Based on the above, list 2-5 concrete, actionable takeaways. Frame each as:
Are there any lessons from this reflection worth saving to memory (feedback-type memories) so they persist across conversations? If so, propose them — but do NOT save them automatically. Ask the user first.
