Skip to main content

source-research

Fast topic research with source discovery, source quality evaluation, and concise synthesis. Use when looking up recent information, comparing sources, or producing a quick/detailed summary with citations.

الانتقال إلى التثبيت

معلومات المصدر

المستودع
SpecterOps/skills
آخر نشاط في المصدر
٢٩ مايو ٢٠٢٦ في ١٥:٥١
لغة SKILL.md المكتشفة
الإنجليزية
النجوم
٦٢٥
التفرعات
٦٨

خيارات التثبيت

يُحدَّد Prompt الذي يراجع المصدر أولًا بشكل افتراضي. يمكنك التبديل إلى أمر مباشر أو تنزيل نسخة محلية.

مراجعة ملفات المصدر

اقرأ SKILL.md وأي ملفات مرافقة يعرضها SkillsMP قبل أن تقرر التثبيت.

مستكشف الملفات
4 ملفات

عرض SKILL.md

SKILL.md
تعليمات المصدر · معاينة للقراءة فقط
name
source-research
description
Fast topic research with source discovery, source quality evaluation, and concise synthesis. Use when looking up recent information, comparing sources, or producing a quick/detailed summary with citations.
metadata
{"author":"GhostWorks"}
# Research Perform focused research on a user-provided topic and return source-backed findings. ## Input Parsing Interpret input as: `TOPIC [MODE]` Rules: 1. Treat all input as topic except the last token when it matches a mode. 2. Supported modes: `quick`, `deep`, `sources`. 3. Default to `quick` when no mode is provided. Examples: - `$source-research DLL sideloading detection` - `$source-research C2 frameworks 2026 deep` - `$source-research ADCS ESC1 sources` ## Modes ### quick (default) Use for rapid, high-signal answers. 1. Run 2-3 targeted web searches from different angles. 2. Open top results and extract concrete facts. 3. Evaluate source quality (recency, authority, relevance). 4. Return concise synthesis with citations. ### deep Use for broader investigation and tradeoff analysis. 1. Run 5+ searches covering multiple angles. 2. Read the most relevant sources in detail. 3. Synthesize agreements, disagreements, and gaps. 4. Return comprehensive findings with citations. ### sources Use for bibliography-first output without synthesis. 1. Run 3-4 targeted searches. 2. Rank and annotate the strongest sources. 3. Return a numbered source list with short notes. ## Output Templates ### quick/deep ```markdown ## TL;DR 2-3 sentence summary. ## Key Findings - Finding 1 - Finding 2 - Finding 3 ## Sources 1. [Title](url) ? one-line annotation 2. [Title](url) ? one-line annotation ## Gaps - What remains uncertain or under-sourced. ``` ### sources ```markdown ## Sources: <topic> 1. [Title](url) ? annotation (recency, authority, value) 2. [Title](url) ? annotation **Best starting point:** Source N ? reason **Most authoritative:** Source N ? reason ``` ## Quality Rules - Always include URLs for claims. - Prefer primary and recent sources. - For security topics, prioritize vendor advisories, MITRE ATT&CK, and CVE/NVD records. - Explicitly state uncertainty rather than padding with weak sources. - Offer to export findings to a file when helpful. - Make sure to explain how the findings can be used in an offensive capability
عرض على GitHub