source-research
Fast topic research with source discovery, source quality evaluation, and concise synthesis. Use when looking up recent information, comparing sources, or producing a quick/detailed summary with citations.
来源信息
- 仓库
- SpecterOps/skills
- 最近来源活动
- 2026年5月29日 15:51
- 检测到的 SKILL.md 语言
- 英语
- 星标
- 657
- 分支
- 72
安装方式
默认使用会先检查来源的 Prompt；你也可以切换为直接命令，或下载本地副本。
检查来源文件
决定是否安装前，请先阅读 SKILL.md，以及 SkillsMP 当前展示的配套文件。
文件资源管理器
4 个文件正在显示 SKILL.md
SKILL.md
来源说明 · 只读预览- name
- source-research
- description
- Fast topic research with source discovery, source quality evaluation, and concise synthesis. Use when looking up recent information, comparing sources, or producing a quick/detailed summary with citations.
- metadata
- {"author":"GhostWorks"}
# Research
Perform focused research on a user-provided topic and return source-backed findings.
## Input Parsing
Interpret input as: `TOPIC [MODE]`
Rules:
1. Treat all input as topic except the last token when it matches a mode.
2. Supported modes: `quick`, `deep`, `sources`.
3. Default to `quick` when no mode is provided.
Examples:
- `$source-research DLL sideloading detection`
- `$source-research C2 frameworks 2026 deep`
- `$source-research ADCS ESC1 sources`
## Modes
### quick (default)
Use for rapid, high-signal answers.
1. Run 2-3 targeted web searches from different angles.
2. Open top results and extract concrete facts.
3. Evaluate source quality (recency, authority, relevance).
4. Return concise synthesis with citations.
### deep
Use for broader investigation and tradeoff analysis.
1. Run 5+ searches covering multiple angles.
2. Read the most relevant sources in detail.
3. Synthesize agreements, disagreements, and gaps.
4. Return comprehensive findings with citations.
### sources
Use for bibliography-first output without synthesis.
1. Run 3-4 targeted searches.
2. Rank and annotate the strongest sources.
3. Return a numbered source list with short notes.
## Output Templates
### quick/deep
```markdown
## TL;DR
2-3 sentence summary.
## Key Findings
- Finding 1
- Finding 2
- Finding 3
## Sources
1. [Title](url) ? one-line annotation
2. [Title](url) ? one-line annotation
## Gaps
- What remains uncertain or under-sourced.
```
### sources
```markdown
## Sources: <topic>
1. [Title](url) ? annotation (recency, authority, value)
2. [Title](url) ? annotation
**Best starting point:** Source N ? reason
**Most authoritative:** Source N ? reason
```
## Quality Rules
- Always include URLs for claims.
- Prefer primary and recent sources.
- For security topics, prioritize vendor advisories, MITRE ATT&CK, and CVE/NVD records.
- Explicitly state uncertainty rather than padding with weak sources.
- Offer to export findings to a file when helpful.
- Make sure to explain how the findings can be used in an offensive capability
在 GitHub 查看