Skip to main content

source-research

Fast topic research with source discovery, source quality evaluation, and concise synthesis. Use when looking up recent information, comparing sources, or producing a quick/detailed summary with citations.

Ir a la instalación

Datos de origen

Repositorio
SpecterOps/skills
Última actividad en el origen
29 de mayo de 2026 a las 15:51
Idioma detectado de SKILL.md
inglés
Estrellas
657
Forks
72

Opciones de instalación

De forma predeterminada está seleccionado el prompt que primero revisa el origen. Puedes cambiar a un comando directo o descargar una copia local.

Revisa los archivos de origen

Lee SKILL.md y los archivos complementarios que muestra SkillsMP antes de decidir si quieres instalarlo.

Explorador de archivos
4 archivos

Mostrando SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Instrucciones de origen · Vista previa de solo lectura
name
source-research
description
Fast topic research with source discovery, source quality evaluation, and concise synthesis. Use when looking up recent information, comparing sources, or producing a quick/detailed summary with citations.
metadata
{"author":"GhostWorks"}
# Research Perform focused research on a user-provided topic and return source-backed findings. ## Input Parsing Interpret input as: `TOPIC [MODE]` Rules: 1. Treat all input as topic except the last token when it matches a mode. 2. Supported modes: `quick`, `deep`, `sources`. 3. Default to `quick` when no mode is provided. Examples: - `$source-research DLL sideloading detection` - `$source-research C2 frameworks 2026 deep` - `$source-research ADCS ESC1 sources` ## Modes ### quick (default) Use for rapid, high-signal answers. 1. Run 2-3 targeted web searches from different angles. 2. Open top results and extract concrete facts. 3. Evaluate source quality (recency, authority, relevance). 4. Return concise synthesis with citations. ### deep Use for broader investigation and tradeoff analysis. 1. Run 5+ searches covering multiple angles. 2. Read the most relevant sources in detail. 3. Synthesize agreements, disagreements, and gaps. 4. Return comprehensive findings with citations. ### sources Use for bibliography-first output without synthesis. 1. Run 3-4 targeted searches. 2. Rank and annotate the strongest sources. 3. Return a numbered source list with short notes. ## Output Templates ### quick/deep ```markdown ## TL;DR 2-3 sentence summary. ## Key Findings - Finding 1 - Finding 2 - Finding 3 ## Sources 1. [Title](url) ? one-line annotation 2. [Title](url) ? one-line annotation ## Gaps - What remains uncertain or under-sourced. ``` ### sources ```markdown ## Sources: <topic> 1. [Title](url) ? annotation (recency, authority, value) 2. [Title](url) ? annotation **Best starting point:** Source N ? reason **Most authoritative:** Source N ? reason ``` ## Quality Rules - Always include URLs for claims. - Prefer primary and recent sources. - For security topics, prioritize vendor advisories, MITRE ATT&CK, and CVE/NVD records. - Explicitly state uncertainty rather than padding with weak sources. - Offer to export findings to a file when helpful. - Make sure to explain how the findings can be used in an offensive capability
Ver en GitHub