Skip to main content

vet-creator

Run a full creator vetting assessment. Use when evaluating a potential influencer for a campaign, checking authenticity, or building a creator profile for the talent database.

Source facts

Repository
bivex/bp-influence
Last source activity
February 15, 2026 at 01:08
Detected SKILL.md language
English
Stars
0
Forks
0

Install options

The review-first prompt is selected by default. You can switch to a direct command or download a local copy.

Review the source files

Read SKILL.md and any companion files shown by SkillsMP before deciding whether to install.

Showing SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Source instructions · Read-only preview
name
vet-creator
description
Run a full creator vetting assessment. Use when evaluating a potential influencer for a campaign, checking authenticity, or building a creator profile for the talent database.
# Creator Vetting Report Vet the following creator for partnership: **$ARGUMENTS** ## Vetting Checklist ### 1. Profile Overview | Field | Value | |-------|-------| | Handle / Name | | | Platform(s) | | | Follower count | | | Tier | Nano (<10K) / Micro (10K–50K) / Mid (50K–500K) / Macro (500K–1M) / Mega (1M+) | | Primary niche | | | Secondary niches | | | Location / Market | | | Language(s) | | | Content frequency | posts per week | | Active since | | ### 2. Audience Quality (Authenticity Check) | Signal | Assessment | 🟢/🟡/🔴 | |--------|-----------|-----------| | Engagement rate vs. tier benchmark | | | | Follower growth pattern (organic vs. spikes) | | | | Comment quality (genuine vs. generic/bot) | | | | Follower-to-following ratio | | | | Audience demographics match target? | | | | Evidence of engagement pods? | | | | Suspicious follower accounts? | | | **Authenticity Score**: ___ / 10 ### 3. Content Quality | Dimension | Assessment | Score /10 | |-----------|-----------|-----------| | Visual quality (lighting, composition, editing) | | | | Audio quality (if video) | | | | Storytelling / narrative structure | | | | Platform-native feel | | | | Consistency of style and quality | | | | Caption quality and CTA effectiveness | | | **Content Score**: ___ / 10 ### 4. Brand Alignment | Factor | Assessment | 🟢/🟡/🔴 | |--------|-----------|-----------| | Values alignment with brand | | | | Aesthetic fit with brand identity | | | | Audience overlap with target personas | | | | Previous brand partnerships (quality) | | | | Competitor partnerships (last 12 months) | | | | Category expertise / authority | | | **Alignment Score**: ___ / 10 ### 5. Brand Safety Scan | Check | Finding | 🟢/🟡/🔴 | |-------|---------|-----------| | Controversial past content | | | | Political statements | | | | Offensive language or imagery | | | | Legal issues / disputes | | | | Fake follower history | | | | Undisclosed sponsorships | | | | Competitor exclusivity conflicts | | | **Safety Rating**: Green (proceed) / Yellow (proceed with monitoring) / Red (do not engage) ### 6. Commercial Assessment | Factor | Value | |--------|-------| | Estimated rate range | | | Rate vs. tier benchmark | Above / At / Below market | | Previous campaign performance (if available) | | | Responsiveness / professionalism (if known) | | | Management / agency | | | Contact details | | ### 7. Overall Recommendation | | | |---|---| | **Composite Score** | ___ / 10 | | **Recommendation** | ✅ Recommend / ⚠️ Conditional / ❌ Pass | | **Conditions (if any)** | | | **Suggested campaign type** | Gifting / Paid / Affiliate / Ambassador | | **Suggested first activation** | | | **Risk factors to monitor** | |
View on GitHub