| name | aipom-operating-model-roadmap |
| description | Convert evidence-based operating-model findings into an owned 30-, 90-, 180-, and 365-day sequence of interventions, learning milestones, dependencies, and decisions. |
| type | workflow |
| category | cross-category |
| phase | 1 |
| status | active |
| operating_level | ["organization","portfolio","product-team"] |
| audience | ["CPO","CTO","VP Product","Product Operations","Product Manager","Finance","AI Governance"] |
| best_for | ["Turning an AIPOM assessment into action","Sequencing cross-category operating-model change","Aligning owners, evidence, dependencies, and review decisions"] |
| evidence_required | ["AIPOM assessment or equivalent evidence-based findings","Critical gaps and constrained decisions","Current initiatives, owners, capacity, and dependencies","Strategic priorities and change constraints"] |
| produces | ["30/90/180/365-day operating-model roadmap","Intervention dependency and ownership map","Evidence milestones and governance cadence"] |
| assessment_questions | ["STR-01","STR-02","STR-03","STR-04","STR-05","POR-01","POR-02","POR-03","POR-04","POR-05","WFL-01","WFL-02","WFL-03","WFL-04","WFL-05","CTX-01","CTX-02","CTX-03","CTX-04","CTX-05","EVAL-01","EVAL-02","EVAL-03","EVAL-04","EVAL-05","GOV-01","GOV-02","GOV-03","GOV-04","GOV-05","CAP-01","CAP-02","[Truncated]"] |
| maturity_move | {"from":"emerging","to":"repeatable"} |
| estimated_time | 2-3 hours across one or more sessions |
| group_size | 4-12 |
| depends_on | ["aipom-operating-model-assessment"] |
| combine_with | ["aipom-strategy-thesis-advisor","aipom-portfolio-posture-advisor","aipom-workflow-opportunity-advisor","aipom-context-readiness-advisor","aipom-evaluation-strategy-advisor","responsible-aipom-governance-advisor","aipom-capability-maturity-advisor"] |
| sources | [] |
AIPOM Operating Model Roadmap
What Is It
Convert evidence-based findings into a sequenced operating-model change plan. The roadmap connects consequential conditions to interventions, dependencies, owners, evidence milestones, decisions, and review cadence across 30, 90, 180, and 365 days.
Why Use It
Assessments fail when every gap becomes a workstream, low scores determine priority mechanically, or a transformation plan outruns ownership and learning capacity. This workflow builds the smallest coherent sequence that can change practice and generate evidence.
When to Use It
Use after the AIPOM assessment or a comparable evidence-based diagnosis. Refresh after major evidence, incidents, strategic changes, or completed roadmap horizons.
What It Produces
- Priority conditions and outcome logic
- Critical safeguards and constrained decisions
- Intervention and dependency sequence
- 30-, 90-, 180-, and 365-day roadmap
- Owners, evidence milestones, decision gates, and review cadence
- Assumptions, unresolved questions, and deferred work
Who Should Participate
Include the accountable executive, Product Operations, portfolio and product leaders, technical and data leaders, governance partners, finance or operations, and owners expected to deliver the first 90 days.
Evidence to Bring
Bring assessment profiles, evidence confidence, disagreements, critical gaps, current initiatives, strategic priorities, capacity, dependencies, existing change programs, and examples of previous adoption or implementation failure.
How to Do It
- Load the assessment ledger. Preserve scope, evidence, assumptions, disagreements, critical gaps, and recommendations.
- Confirm the decision horizon. Name what must improve and which decisions the roadmap must enable.
- Prioritize conditions. Consider consequence, dependency, strategic relevance, evidence, tractability, and ownership—not score alone.
- Apply safeguards first. Sequence immediate constraints for critical governance, safety, legal, privacy, security, evaluation, or accountability gaps.
- Map dependencies. Identify which strategy, portfolio, workflow, context, evaluation, governance, or capability conditions unlock others.
- Select interventions. Use the smallest AIPOM skills or foundational methods that can change each condition.
- Sequence horizons. Put containment and evidence in 30 days, repeatable practice in 90, operational integration in 180, and measured reuse or scaling in 365.
