| name | biz-dev-social-media-audit-offer |
| description | Turns a free 30-minute social media diagnostic into a business development tool — structuring the audit, framing findings to demonstrate expertise, and scripting the transition from free audit to paid engagement. Invoke when a consultant wants to offer a free audit as a lead generation technique, when preparing for a discovery meeting with a prospective client, or when converting an audit presentation into a paid proposal. |
Free Social Media Audit — Business Development Skill
Use the free social media audit as a lead generation and conversion tool. The audit demonstrates expertise the prospect doesn't have, surfaces the right problems, and creates a natural path to a paid engagement. This is a consultant-facing skill — not a client-facing deliverable.
Source: Johnson, J. (2023) How to Become a Social Media Manager
Use when
- Turns a free 30-minute social media diagnostic into a business development tool — structuring the audit, framing findings to demonstrate expertise, and scripting the transition from free audit to paid engagement. Invoke when a consultant wants to offer a free audit as a lead generation technique, when preparing for a discovery meeting with a prospective client, or when converting an audit presentation into a paid proposal.
- Use this skill when it is the closest match to the requested deliverable or workflow.
Do not use when
- Do not use this skill for graphic design, video production, software development, or legal advice beyond the repository's stated scope.
- Do not use it when another skill in this repository is clearly more specific to the requested deliverable.
Workflow
- Collect the required inputs or source material before drafting, unless this skill explicitly generates the intake itself.
- Follow the section order and decision rules in this
SKILL.md; do not skip mandatory steps or required fields.
- Read files in
references/ only when the body points to them or when you need the deeper framework, examples, or evidence.
- Review the draft against the quality criteria, then deliver the final output in markdown unless the skill specifies another format.
Anti-Patterns
- Do not invent client facts, performance data, budgets, or approvals that were not provided or clearly inferred from evidence.
- Do not skip required inputs, mandatory sections, or quality checks just to make the output shorter.
- Do not drift into out-of-scope work such as code implementation, design production, or unsupported legal conclusions.
Outputs
- A structured markdown document, plan, playbook, or strategy ready for client-facing or internal use.
References
- Read
references/proposal-frameworks.md when you need the deeper framework, examples, or supporting material it contains.
Required Input
Ask for the following before generating:
- Prospect business name and industry — the business being audited
- Active platforms to audit — list only platforms the prospect currently uses (do not audit dormant accounts)
- Presentation format — in-person meeting, WhatsApp call, or written email report
- Consultant's primary service — the core service to position after the audit (e.g., monthly content management, social media strategy, community management)
The Business Logic
The free audit works because it does two things simultaneously:
- It demonstrates expertise — the consultant surfaces findings the prospect has not noticed. Every specific observation builds credibility.
- It creates a problem → solution dynamic — every finding is a gap, and every gap is a potential service line.
The audit must be specific enough to be genuinely valuable, but not so complete that it eliminates the need to hire the consultant. Surface the right problems; do not solve them for free.
The audit itself costs the consultant 45 minutes: 30 minutes to conduct, 15 minutes to prepare findings. If the prospect converts to a paid client, that time is recovered within the first month's retainer.
Do not charge for the audit. Charging creates friction and removes the low-barrier entry point that makes this technique effective.
Audit Structure — 5 Areas, 30 Minutes
Conduct the audit before the discovery meeting. Do not do it live in front of the prospect.
Area 1: Profile Completeness (5 minutes)
Check across all active platforms:
- Profile photo quality and consistency across platforms
- Bio completeness — does it include a clear call to action, a link, and relevant keywords?
- Contact information — WhatsApp number, email address, physical location where applicable
- Pinned posts, story highlights, and cover photos — are they current and purposeful?
- Link-in-bio destination — does it work? Does it lead to a relevant, converting page?
Score: 0–10. Note the 2 most critical gaps.
Area 2: Content Quality (10 minutes)
Review the last 30 posts across all active platforms:
- Are content pillars evident, or is posting random and reactive?
- Is the brand voice consistent across posts, or does it shift in tone and register?
- Are posts formatted for the algorithm — video, carousel — or are they single static images by habit?
- Does the copy open with a hook, or does it bury the lead?
- Do promotional posts carry a call to action?
- Is there AI-generated content that sounds generic or off-brand?
Score: 0–10. Note the most common failure pattern — the single issue that appears most frequently across the 30 posts.
Area 3: Engagement and Reach (5 minutes)
Access native analytics (Meta Business Suite, LinkedIn Analytics, TikTok Studio):
- Average engagement rate vs industry benchmark — EA context: 2–4% is healthy for most SMEs; below 1% signals a content or frequency problem
- Post frequency vs recommended cadence for each platform — note the gap
- Best-performing post type: video, carousel, static image, or story
- Worst-performing post type
- Follower growth rate: growing, flat, or declining over the last 90 days?
Score: 0–10. Note the single biggest engagement opportunity.
Area 4: Competitor Snapshot (5 minutes)
Identify 2 local competitors — same city or same sector:
- Follower count vs prospect
- Posting frequency vs prospect
- Content types used vs prospect
- Most engaged post — note the post type, approximate engagement numbers, and what made it work
- One specific thing the competitor is doing better
This section generates urgency without the consultant manufacturing it artificially. Present competitor data factually and without editorial commentary — the numbers carry the weight.
No score. Use as a comparative reference in the findings presentation.
EA note: Refer to competitor findings with care. East African professional and business circles are small; word travels quickly. Present the data as market context, not as criticism of named businesses.
Area 5: Monetisation and Conversion (5 minutes)
- Is there a clear path from social post to purchase or enquiry?
- Does the link-in-bio lead to a landing page, a WhatsApp number, or just the homepage?
- Is there a lead magnet or opt-in offer visible on any platform?
- Are paid posts being run? Are they boosted posts or properly targeted campaigns?
- Is there any social commerce integration — Facebook Shop, WhatsApp Business Catalogue, Instagram Shopping?
Score: 0–10. Note the single clearest missed conversion opportunity.
Findings Presentation Format
Structure findings as a one-page document or a 5-slide mini-deck. Deliver verbally and leave a printed one-pager, or send a WhatsApp voice note summary followed by the document. Adapt to the prospect's preferred communication style.
Section 1: Summary Score
Overall score out of 50. Apply colour coding:
- 0–20 — Critical: Foundational gaps across multiple areas; significant opportunity
- 21–35 — Developing: Inconsistent performance; clear areas for improvement
- 36–50 — Healthy: Strong baseline; refinement and growth strategy needed
Do not present the score as a grade. Frame it as a starting point: "Here's where things stand today, and here's what's possible."
Section 2: Top 3 Wins
Lead with what the prospect is doing well. Choose 3 genuine positives — not faint praise. This section demonstrates that the consultant was paying careful attention, not simply looking for problems. It builds trust before the gaps are introduced.
Section 3: Top 3 Gaps
Present the 3 most important problems. Express each gap as a business impact, not a technical deficiency.
- Not: "Your captions don't have hooks."
- Instead: "Your posts aren't stopping the scroll, which means your organic reach isn't growing even when you post consistently."
Frame each gap as: the symptom → the business consequence → the fix (described at headline level only).
Do not prescribe the full solution. Name the direction; reserve the detail for the paid engagement.
Section 4: The Competitor Gap
One concrete example of a local competitor outperforming the prospect. Use real figures — follower counts, engagement numbers, post frequency. Avoid speculation. One well-chosen example is more effective than a general statement about the competitive landscape.
Section 5: Recommended Next Steps
Give 3 recommended actions — tiered by effort and investment:
- Quick win — something the prospect can do this week at no cost (e.g., update the link-in-bio, pin a strong post, add a WhatsApp number to the Facebook profile)
- Medium-term action — achievable within one month at low cost (e.g., establish 3 content pillars, commit to a posting schedule, set up Meta Business Suite)
- Strategic recommendation — requires professional help and is the natural entry point for the paid engagement (e.g., develop a 90-day content strategy, set up a conversion-optimised profile suite, launch a community management programme)
The quick win demonstrates goodwill. The strategic recommendation opens the conversation about paid work.
The Transition to Paid
Deliver this pivot after presenting the findings. Use it verbatim or adapt it closely:
"Based on what I've found, there are three areas where I could make an immediate difference for your business. I typically work with businesses like yours on a monthly retainer that covers [describe the core service]. Before I put together a formal proposal, can I ask — what's your priority right now: more content, better reach, or more enquiries from social?"
This question:
- Opens a conversation about the prospect's real goal rather than the consultant's service menu
- Avoids quoting a price before understanding priorities
- Creates a natural path to the written proposal
After the prospect responds, proceed to the proposal stage. Invoke biz-dev-proposal to generate the formal proposal and Statement of Work.
EA-Specific Delivery Notes
- Conduct the initial audit discovery on WhatsApp or in person — not email. Conversion rates for professional services engagements in the East African market are higher through direct, personal communication.
- The findings presentation can be delivered verbally with a printed one-pager, or via a WhatsApp voice note summary followed by a shared document. Match the format to the prospect's communication habits.
- If the prospect is not ready to engage, close with: "Can I check back with you in 30 days?" Recurring touchpoints are how East African professional services businesses build pipeline. Do not treat a deferred decision as a lost lead.
- On WhatsApp: send the one-pager as a PDF, not as a series of text messages. A document signals professionalism and is easier for the prospect to share internally.
Persuasion Frameworks
Apply frameworks from references/proposal-frameworks.md when generating this document.
Key principles for audit offer documents:
- Open with the problem the audit will reveal — not the audit methodology (Sant: Primacy Principle — the client cares about the insight, not the process)
- The audit offer is a diagnostic gift, not a sales tool — position it as intelligence the prospective client genuinely needs, regardless of whether they engage (Hatton: Empathy Model)
- Apply Go/No-Go criteria before offering a free audit — invest time only in prospects who meet all three qualifying criteria (Hatton)
- Frame the audit findings as the N (Need) in NOSE — the audit surfaces the problem; the proposal that follows provides the O, S, and E (Sant: NOSE)
- The audit offer document itself is Physical Evidence — its quality and specificity demonstrate the rigour of the agency's analytical process before the engagement begins (Hatton: Competitive Advantage Equation)
Read references/proposal-frameworks.md for the full framework guide.
Quality Criteria
- All 5 audit areas are scored numerically (0–10 each); no area is described qualitatively without a score
- The findings presentation leads with wins before gaps — trust is established before problems are introduced
- The competitor gap section uses real, specific data — follower counts, post types, engagement figures — not hypothetical or generalised comparisons
- The transition to paid is scripted word-for-word, not described abstractly
- The full audit takes no more than 30 minutes to conduct; preparation takes no more than 15 minutes
- Delivery format guidance is specific to EA context — WhatsApp, in-person, printed one-pager are all named explicitly
- Recommended next steps follow the three-tier structure: one free quick win, one low-cost medium-term action, one professional-help strategic recommendation
- Gap statements are framed as business consequences, not technical observations
