Menu
Skills in this repository
SkillsMP has collected 1,021 skills from protosphinx/sphinxstack. Open a skill to review its source and details.
protosphinx/sphinxstackShowing 40 of 1,021 collected skills.
Respond to suspected payroll fraud by protecting employees, containing payment and access abuse, preserving evidence, reconciling beneficiaries, and securing the next payroll run. Use when payroll credentials, bank details, files, off-cycle payments, or…
Respond to a publication ethics crisis through harm containment, evidence preservation, independent claim and source review, conflict disclosure, correction or retraction, and accountable reform. Use when serious allegations challenge the truthfulness,…
Respond to recruitment fraud by protecting affected candidates, scoping impersonation and access, preserving evidence, containing channels, and verifying recovery. Use when attackers impersonate an employer, recruiter, worker, candidate, or hiring platform.
Respond to a research integrity concern with independent authority, protected reporting, evidence custody, fair allegation assessment, and verified correction. Use when fabrication, falsification, plagiarism, authorship abuse, interference, or retaliation may…
Respond to a research misconduct allegation through human protection, independent authority, evidence custody, fair process, research-record correction, and verified reform. Use when fabrication, falsification, plagiarism, interference, or related integrity…
Respond to a software supply-chain compromise through trust containment, provenance reconstruction, consumer impact analysis, clean rebuild, credential recovery, correction, and verified hardening. Use when source, dependencies, builders, artifacts, signing,…
Respond to web cache poisoning by scoping variants, preserving evidence, containing shared delivery, repairing cache keys, and proving trusted restoration. Use when attacker-influenced content or headers may be served from a shared cache.
Respond to suspected account takeover through victim protection, scoped containment, preserved evidence, and proof-based recovery. Use when an unauthorized party may control a user account, session, credential, or recovery channel.
Respond to a monitoring blind spot by scoping lost evidence, using independent signals, reducing operating risk, and restoring visibility. Use when telemetry, alerting, dashboards, or health checks may be missing or misleading during production operation.
Respond to peer review with a complete comment inventory, respectful evidence-based replies, traceable revisions, and explicit disagreements. Use when revising a manuscript, proposal, thesis, or conference submission.
Assess public criticism and prepare a proportionate, evidence-bounded response. Use when a credible complaint, allegation, viral post, review, article, campaign, or stakeholder statement may require correction, accountability, support, or deliberate silence.
Respond to resume identity theft and employment impersonation through victim protection, evidence preservation, account containment, corrections, and monitored recovery. Use when someone uses another person's career identity, credentials, profile, or…
Restore a corrupted media project while preserving sources, provenance, edit intent, dependencies, and verifiable outputs. Use when project files, storage, proxies, databases, or renders are damaged or inconsistent.
Review an existing resume line by line. What a screener sees in six seconds, what to cut, what needs evidence. Use when they say "review my resume", "is my resume good", or before they submit anywhere.
Re-enter work with current evidence, chosen privacy boundaries, refreshed materials, and a sustainable ramp. Use when a career break has changed confidence, availability, skills, needs, or the story presented to employers.
Plan a return-to-work job search around current skills, evidence, schedule, support, accommodations, and truthful gap communication. Use when re-entering paid work after caregiving, illness, study, unemployment, service, retirement, or another break.
Map a proposed data processing agreement to operational capabilities and unresolved decisions. Use when privacy, security, procurement, legal, and service owners need a structured review before signing or renewal.
Review a dependency update for provenance, compatibility, security, behavior, transitive change, build output, rollout, and rollback. Use when a library, toolchain, action, image, or runtime version changes.
Review an interface at browser and text zoom for reflow, readability, focus, clipping, overlap, and task completion. Use when validating whether a responsive design remains usable when content is enlarged.
Review a design specification for complete states, rules, content, accessibility, data, and implementation decisions. Use when a feature is approaching engineering handoff or approval.
Review a modal dialog for necessity, focus, keyboard, reading order, content, actions, escape, errors, mobile layout, and recovery. Use when an interruptive overlay must support a clear task.
Review a proposed code change for behavioral defects, regressions, security risks, and missing proof, then report only actionable findings. Use when someone asks for a pull request review, code review, diff review, or a release-readiness check on a change.
Review and rewrite one product error message so it explains the state, preserves user work, and offers a safe recovery. Use when an interface error is confusing, blaming, inaccessible, overly technical, or operationally unhelpful.
Contain, replace, and verify credentials after suspected or confirmed exposure. Use when a token, key, password, certificate, signing secret, or machine credential may be copied, logged, leaked, or misused.
Facilitate a candidate debrief that reconciles independent evidence against predefined role criteria. Use when a hiring team must make or recommend a selection decision.
Inventory and evaluate a content estate by purpose, quality, risk, performance, and ownership. Use when a site, help center, knowledge base, campaign library, or documentation set needs keep, improve, merge, redirect, archive, or remove decisions.
Run a brief daily coordination check focused on flow, blockers, dependencies, and immediate decisions. Use when a team needs synchronization without a status recital.
Package an approved interface design into implementable states, behavior, assets, accessibility requirements, and acceptance checks, then resolve questions with engineering. Use when designs are ready to build, developers lack needed details, or a…
Facilitate a bounded design decision with shared evidence and explicit authority. Use when contributors need to understand a problem, generate options, expose tradeoffs, and leave with an owned next step.
Measure how a system behaves under a realistic and safely bounded workload. Model user traffic, establish a baseline, find saturation, and turn results into a capacity decision. Use when launch traffic, growth, or a performance change needs evidence rather…
Plan and run a recurring one-on-one that surfaces priorities, support needs, feedback, growth, and commitments. Use when a manager and team member need a reliable meeting rhythm.
Run a pre-mortem that imagines failure, surfaces independent causes, prioritizes controllable risks, and converts insight into owned prevention and contingency actions. Use when a plan is important enough to challenge before execution.
Assess privacy risk and control readiness before a consequential data change. Use when a product, model, vendor, monitoring practice, migration, or integration changes people, purposes, data, decisions, or exposure.
Rehearse a procurement failure to expose decision, authority, evidence, and continuity gaps. Use when teams need to test plans for supplier, payment, integrity, or service disruption without causing live harm.
Test an immutable release candidate against the highest product and operational risks, then produce a release recommendation. Use when a frozen build, package, image, mobile binary, or deployment artifact is ready for final verification.
Explain a consequential failure through a controlled evidence record, causal testing, and verified control improvements. Use when reviewing incidents, defects, losses, or repeated process breakdowns.
Conduct a sales-discovery conversation that establishes the prospect's real workflow, impact, constraints, decision process, and next step. Use when running an initial qualification or needs conversation before proposing a solution.
Transfer support cases between people, teams, shifts, or vendors without losing context, ownership, or customer commitments. Use when an escalation, shift change, specialist transfer, or long-running case changes owner.
Run a real survey and report what it says. Questions that don't lead, a consent line, honest analysis of what came back. Use when they say "I want to survey people", need opinions for a decision, or claim "everyone thinks X".
Facilitate a psychologically safer retrospective that turns shared evidence into owned improvement experiments. Use when reviewing a delivery cycle, event, incident, or repeated workflow.