stakeholder-objection-simulation

name	stakeholder-objection-simulation
description	Simulate stakeholder objections through role-play and political feasibility analysis to test whether the decision survives real-world opposition.
dependencies	{"tactics":["adversarial-debate-protocol","multi-perspective-attack"]}

Stakeholder Objection Simulation

Purpose: Anticipate and simulate the strongest objections that real stakeholders would raise against the convergence decision, testing political feasibility and identifying resistance vectors before implementation.

When to use:

• When the decision affects multiple stakeholder groups
• When implementation requires buy-in from parties not in the room
• When political dynamics could block execution
• When prior decisions failed due to unanticipated opposition

Budget

Metric	Minimum
Stakeholder perspectives	>= 3 distinct groups
Objection depth	Full argument construction per stakeholder
Feasibility assessment	Explicit for each objection

State Ledger

stakeholders_simulated: []
objections_raised: {}
severity_ratings: {}
mitigation_strategies: {}
political_feasibility: null  # HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW

Available Tactics

Tactic	When to Deploy
multi-perspective-attack	Default — assign and attack from stakeholder perspectives
adversarial-debate-protocol	When a specific stakeholder objection needs formal resolution

Available SOPs

• perspective-assignment — define stakeholder perspectives and interests
• perspective-attack — simulate attacks from each stakeholder
• steel-manning-synthesis — synthesize across all stakeholder objections
• advocate-construction — build case for stakeholder's preferred alternative
• judge-verdict — assess whether objections are fatal

Execution Guidance

1. Identify all affected stakeholder groups (minimum 3)
2. Deploy multi-perspective-attack with stakeholder-specific briefs
3. For each HIGH severity objection, assess mitigation feasibility
4. If any objection is both HIGH severity and LOW mitigability, escalate
5. Produce political feasibility rating with evidence

Output Format

strategy: stakeholder-objection-simulation
stakeholders_simulated: <count>
objections:
  - stakeholder: <group>
    objection: <core argument>
    severity: HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW
    mitigable: true | false
    mitigation: <if applicable>
political_feasibility: HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW
blocking_objections: []
recommended_accommodations: []

Available Tactics

Optional, no fixed order; the final leaf is always a sop.

Tactic	When to use
adversarial-debate-protocol	Structured debate protocol that constructs an advocate, deploys critic attacks, and renders a judge verdict through iterative rounds.
multi-perspective-attack	Assign distinct perspectives to attack a decision from multiple angles, then synthesize findings into a unified assessment.