Strategy for identifying fundamental dimensions of variation in a design space.
Skills in this repository
yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine - Page 12
SkillsMP has collected 961 skills from yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine. Open a skill to review its source and details.
yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engineShowing 40 of 961 collected skills.
Find direct analogies from nature/tech/society that share structural properties with the problem. Produces analogy list with structural mappings.
Find structurally similar systems in nature/technology/society. Map structural parallels to generate transferable solution principles.
Focus within the user's chosen field(s). Identify specific sub-directions through deep paper and web research, then present ranked candidates. Use after landscape-reconnaissance has identified fields of interest.
Map the structure of disagreement across perspectives using Policy Delphi, Argument Delphi, or SAST methods.
Map disagreement structure by collecting judgments, clustering opinions, extracting arguments per cluster, and visualizing fault lines.
Produce a structured disagreement map showing clusters, arguments, and fault lines.
Identify discrepancies between reported and reproducible scores — 15 methods, 45 data points, 30 web searches budget
Assign probability distributions to uncertain parameters based on available evidence and domain knowledge.
Identifies agreement and disagreement patterns across multiple perspective evaluations. Maps consensus clusters and persistent divergence points.
Maximize portfolio diversity and coverage using MAP-Elites, Niche coverage, Maximum dispersion, and Anti-clustering methods.
Assess documentation completeness against BetterBench/Datasheets standards
Scan and select maximally diverse source domains. Ensures creative search covers genuinely unrelated fields with high transfer potential.
Scan distant domains for transferable principles. Uses web-search and paper-overview to identify analogous solutions in unrelated fields.
Strategy for defining ontology boundaries — identify seed concepts, classify topic size, establish scope constraints.
Identify dominated and non-dominated alternatives in a score matrix using Pareto dominance.
Identify dominant paradigms constraining the field and use de Bono lateral thinking provocations to escape them.
Identify dominant paradigms and assumptions constraining thinking in a research field.
Three-point PERT estimation for implementation activities
Strategy for continuous rating updates using Elo, Glicko-2, TrueSkill 2, and Whole-History Rating for live ranking systems and A/B testing.
Extract ecosystem-level organization patterns (symbiosis, emergence, cycles, resilience).
Extract ecosystem-level organization patterns (symbiosis, emergence, resilience) as design templates for complex systems.
Systematically generate boundary inputs — boundary values, adversarial constructions, distribution shifts, rare combinations, scale extremes.
Systematically extract effect sizes and conditions from papers for meta-analytic synthesis
Determine effect size types and calculation methods for meta-analytic synthesis
Strategy for large-N sparse pairwise comparison using TrueSkill, active learning, and rank centrality to rank 100+ candidates from limited comparisons.
Build structured Evidence Gap Maps — define axes (intervention × outcome or method × domain), place gaps in cells, annotate with evidence density and quality.
Seek properties that emerge from combination (non-additive)
Identify non-additive properties from combinations
Generate technical solutions emulating biological strategies. Bridge from design principle to concrete implementation.
Synthesize all systematic enumeration outputs into a structured idea report with prioritized recommendations.
SOP: define complete experiment environment specification
Identify dominant thinking pattern and escape it via deliberate pattern-breaking.
Compare implementation differences of same benchmark across papers
Model conflicts as Goldratt's Evaporating Cloud — expose hidden assumptions behind opposing needs to dissolve the conflict.
Strategy: evidence-strength-based AHRQ PiCMe assessment — drive gap prioritization with the quality of literature evidence
Gather evidence for causal claims
Assess evidence quality using GRADE/SOE framework. Rates certainty level and identifies downgrade reasons.
Strategy for linking evidence to claims — find supporting/contradicting evidence, create typed edges, assess evidence quality, identify gaps in evidential coverage.
Systematic evidence map construction — search, classify, locate gaps, visualize. Combines concept-matrix-construction, gap-keyword-extraction, evidence-grading, and egm-construction SOPs.