Build evidence network graph for network meta-analysis โ nodes, edges, geometry assessment
Skills in this repository
yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine - Page 13
SkillsMP has collected 961 skills from yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine. Open a skill to review its source and details.
yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engineShowing 40 of 961 collected skills.
Searches for external evidence supporting or opposing specific claims. Returns structured evidence with source assessment and relevance scoring.
Plan the statistical synthesis approach โ model selection, heterogeneity strategy, and reporting
Synthesize multi-source evidence into structured argumentation. Weaves findings from literature, web, and analysis into coherent evidence maps with explicit strength ratings.
Tactic: Evidence gathering, cross-examination, and quality judgment. External evidence is collected, presented, challenged, and scored for relevance and reliability.
Tactic for assessing the strength and relevance of evidence for causal claims โ distinguishes correlation from causation.
Map evolution mechanisms to design operations. Translate selection, mutation, drift, radiation into design operators.
Use evolution mechanisms (selection, mutation, radiation) as design operators for generating and refining solution populations.
Leave the problem entirely and explore an unrelated domain. Produces excursion domain discoveries for later force-fitting.
Full 8-stage Gordon-Prince excursion process. Deliberate departure from the problem into unrelated domains, then force-fit discoveries back.
Orchestrate the excursion sequence โ departure into unrelated domain, force-fit discoveries back to problem, launch springboard ideas.
SOP: generate executable experiment configuration files
Structured data extraction from deep-read papers โ produces comparison tables (method, dataset, metrics, results, limitations). Used by systematic-survey and deep-survey.
Generate boundary and extreme test values for a given parameter dimension to stress-test claims.
Bridge two unrelated thinking matrices via Koestler bisociation. Identify independent frames of reference and force collision to produce creative insight.
List all key factors, conditions, and assumptions that support or enable the artifact's conclusion.
Identify independent, dependent, and control variables for an experiment
Strategy: Systematic factor removal โ remove factors one at a time and observe whether the conclusion remains stable, identifying which factors are load-bearing.
DOE thinking: identify factors, define levels, and explore combinations to systematically cover the design space.
Build cause-mode-effect chains tracing upstream root causes and downstream cascading effects for each failure mode.
Tactic: Trace upstream causes and downstream effects of each failure mode. Builds multi-level cause-mode-effect chains for systemic understanding.
Group observed failures by mechanism (not symptom), identify common triggers per cluster, estimate frequency and severity.
Generate targeted solutions for each identified failure mode, ensuring every failure has at least one proposed mitigation.
Systematically catalog failure modes โ generate edge cases, observe failures, cluster by mechanism, identify triggers and frequency.
Extract structured failure mode list from raw scenarios or artifact analysis. Produces standardized failure mode records.
Catalog all failure modes in a domain, classify them systematically, and generate targeted solutions for each failure type.
Detect false gaps โ search failures, already-solved gaps, and inherently unanswerable questions masquerading as research gaps.
Tactic: hypothesis quality assurance โ check falsifiability, repair failing hypotheses, complete operationalization and boundary-condition specification
Wish-fulfillment thinking โ ignore physical laws for ideal solution. Use unconstrained imagination to reveal what the problem truly needs.
Unconstrained wish-fulfillment ideation. Ignore all physical laws to imagine the ideal solution, then identify realization directions.
Cross-reference the GoalTree against ActorProfile (capabilities), ObstacleReport (known barriers), and timeline (deadline feasibility). Identify infeasible paths and suggest OR alternatives.
Strategy: reshape a research question under resource constraints โ pragmatic adjustment that preserves core value
Synthesize all assessments into a feasibility matrix, recommendation, and risk summary.
Create anonymized feedback report summarizing group judgment distribution for a given round.
Tactic for identifying circular causation โ detect feedback loops, classify as reinforcing or balancing, document loop structure.
Aggregate, deduplicate, and classify findings from multiple probes into a coherent vulnerability report.
Iterative "Why?" questioning (5+ levels) to drill from surface phenomenon to actionable root cause. Each level verified against evidence.
Find the minimal change magnitude along a dimension that causes the conclusion to flip from true to false.
Force-fit excursion discoveries back to the original problem. Deliberately create connections between unrelated findings and the challenge.
Force connections between unrelated technologies. Deliberately construct bridges where none naturally exist to discover novel integration possibilities.