Skip to main content

market-report

Marketing Report Generator (Markdown). Compiles audit + analysis outputs into one client-ready scored report: 6-category scorecard (/100), category deep-dives, competitor matrix, SEO snapshot, revenue-impact estimates, prioritized action plan, 30-60-90 roadmap. Use when the user wants a full marketing report / scorecard / assessment, or to consolidate prior /market audit results. Triggers (EN): "market-report", "/market report", "marketing report", "marketing scorecard", "marketing assessment", "compile the audits", "client report". Triggers (FR): "rapport marketing", "rapport de marketing", "bilan marketing", "scorecard marketing", "compile les audits", "rapport client". Do NOT trigger on running an individual audit (that is /market audit, /market seo, etc.) — this skill consolidates and scores their output.

Quellinformationen

Repository
agentik-os/claude-code-skills
Letzte Quellaktivität
17. September 2026 um 21:42
Erkannte Sprache von SKILL.md
Englisch
Sterne
2
Forks
0

Installationsoptionen

Standardmäßig ist der Prompt ausgewählt, der zuerst die Quelle prüft. Sie können zu einem direkten Befehl wechseln oder eine lokale Kopie herunterladen.

Quelldateien prüfen

Lesen Sie SKILL.md und alle von SkillsMP angezeigten Begleitdateien, bevor Sie sich für eine Installation entscheiden.

SKILL.md wird angezeigt

SKILL.md
Quellanweisungen · Schreibgeschützte Vorschau
name
market-report
description
Marketing Report Generator (Markdown). Compiles audit + analysis outputs into one client-ready scored report: 6-category scorecard (/100), category deep-dives, competitor matrix, SEO snapshot, revenue-impact estimates, prioritized action plan, 30-60-90 roadmap. Use when the user wants a full marketing report / scorecard / assessment, or to consolidate prior /market audit results. Triggers (EN): "market-report", "/market report", "marketing report", "marketing scorecard", "marketing assessment", "compile the audits", "client report". Triggers (FR): "rapport marketing", "rapport de marketing", "bilan marketing", "scorecard marketing", "compile les audits", "rapport client". Do NOT trigger on running an individual audit (that is /market audit, /market seo, etc.) — this skill consolidates and scores their output.
metadata
{"author":"agentik-os","version":"1.0.0","domain":"marketing","triggers":"market-report, marketing","role":"specialist","scope":"analysis","output-format":"report"}
# Marketing Report Generator (Markdown Format) ## Skill Purpose Generate a comprehensive, professionally formatted marketing report in Markdown. This skill compiles data from all previous audit and analysis results into a single, client-ready document with scores, findings, recommendations, and a prioritized action plan with revenue impact estimates. ## When to Use - User wants a full marketing report for a client or their own business - User has completed one or more audit skills and wants a compiled report - User asks for a marketing assessment, scorecard, or analysis document - Triggered by `/market report` or `/market report <domain>` ## Dynamic Workflow orchestration This report is a multi-angle synthesis, not a single linear write-up. The 6 scorecard categories + competitor analysis are file-disjoint, independently-evidenced units — fan them out, verify adversarially, then synthesize the narrative yourself. 1. **Plan the units.** Resolve which of the natural units have source data (Website & Conversion, SEO & Organic, Content & Messaging, Social, Email & Automation, Paid, + Competitor matrix). A unit with no source file is scored "estimate" and flagged, never silently inflated. 2. **Fan out (parallel).** Run one sub-agent per available unit, each reading ONLY its own source file(s) (e.g. SEO unit reads `SEO-AUDIT.md`). Each returns: category score with the per-factor table filled, 3-5 cited findings (`file:line` or source URL), what's working, gaps, ranked recommendations, and a revenue-impact estimate with its confidence factor. Scope rule: one writer per unit, no sub-agent touches another's source or score. 3. **Adversarially verify (≥3 skeptic graders, 2-of-3 consensus).** Before a unit's numbers enter the report, three skeptic lenses try to falsify them: (a) **Evidence lens** — is every score and finding backed by a real citation, or invented? (b) **Inflation lens** — are revenue estimates anchored to actual traffic/conversion data with a conservative confidence factor, not wishful math? (c) **Consistency lens** — do per-factor points sum correctly and match the stated category score and rating band? A unit ships only on ≥2-of-3 pass; otherwise it loops back to its sub-agent with the specific falsification. 4. **Loop-until-dry for discovery.** When the set of available source files is unknown (the user just says "compile what we have"), keep discovering and scoring units until no new source file is found — do not hard-code to a fixed 6. 5. **Synthesize yourself.** Compute the weighted overall score, write the executive summary, top-3 priority actions, and 30-60-90 roadmap from the verified unit outputs. Never paste a sub-agent's section verbatim as the verdict — the narrative and prioritization are your job. ## How to Execute ### Step 1: Collect All Available Data Before generating the report, check for any existing audit data from previous skill runs. Look for these files in the project directory: **Possible data sources:** - `MARKETING-AUDIT.md` -- from `/market audit` - `LANDING-CRO.md` -- from `/market landing` - `SEO-AUDIT.md` -- from `/market seo` - `BRAND-VOICE.md` -- from `/market brand` - `COMPETITOR-ANALYSIS.md` -- from `/market competitors` - `FUNNEL-ANALYSIS.md` -- from `/market funnel` - `CONTENT-AUDIT.md` -- from content analysis - `AD-AUDIT.md` -- from `/market ads` - `SOCIAL-AUDIT.md` -- from `/market social` - `EMAIL-AUDIT.md` -- from `/market emails` If no previous data exists, inform the user and offer to: 1. Run a quick audit first (recommended) 2. Generate a report based on available information (website URL, user-provided data) 3. Create a report template they can fill in ### Step 2: Calculate the Marketing Scorecard Score across 6 categories, each worth up to 100 points. The overall score is the weighted average. #### Category 1: Website & Conversion (Weight: 25%) Evaluate based on landing page analysis, CRO findings, and UX assessment. | Factor | Points Available | Criteria | |---|---|---| | Page load speed | 15 | Under 2s = 15, Under 3s = 10, Under 5s = 5, Over 5s = 0 | | Mobile responsiveness | 15 | Fully responsive = 15, Mostly = 10, Partially = 5, Not = 0 | | Clear value proposition | 20 | Immediately clear = 20, Takes effort = 12, Vague = 5, Missing = 0 | | CTA effectiveness | 20 | Strong and clear = 20, Present but weak = 12, Unclear = 5, Missing = 0 | | Social proof | 15 | Multiple types = 15, Some = 10, Minimal = 5, None = 0 | | Form optimization | 15 | Optimized = 15, Adequate = 10, Needs work = 5, Broken = 0 | #### Category 2: SEO & Organic (Weight: 20%) Evaluate based on SEO audit findings. | Factor | Points Available | Criteria | |---|---|---| | Title tags & meta descriptions | 15 | Optimized = 15, Present = 10, Partial = 5, Missing = 0 | | Header hierarchy (H1-H6) | 10 | Proper = 10, Mostly = 7, Needs work = 3, Missing = 0 | | Content quality (E-E-A-T) | 25 | Excellent = 25, Good = 17, Average = 10, Poor = 3 | | Technical SEO | 20 | No issues = 20, Minor issues = 13, Major issues = 7, Critical = 0 | | Internal linking | 15 | Strategic = 15, Present = 10, Minimal = 5, None = 0 | | Schema markup | 15 | Comprehensive = 15, Basic = 10, Minimal = 5, None = 0 | #### Category 3: Content & Messaging (Weight: 15%) Evaluate based on brand voice analysis and content audit. | Factor | Points Available | Criteria | |---|---|---| | Brand voice consistency | 20 | Consistent = 20, Mostly = 13, Inconsistent = 7, No voice = 0 | | Content quality | 25 | Expert-level = 25, Good = 17, Generic = 10, Poor = 3 | | Content variety | 15 | Multiple formats = 15, Some = 10, Limited = 5, Single = 0 | | Publishing frequency | 15 | Regular cadence = 15, Sporadic = 10, Rare = 5, None = 0 | | Audience targeting | 25 | Precisely targeted = 25, Somewhat = 17, Broad = 10, Off-target = 3 | #### Category 4: Social Media & Community (Weight: 15%) Evaluate based on social media presence and engagement. | Factor | Points Available | Criteria | |---|---|---| | Platform presence | 15 | Right platforms, active = 15, Present but inactive = 8, Missing key = 3 | | Content quality | 25 | Engaging and on-brand = 25, Adequate = 15, Low quality = 7, Poor = 0 | | Engagement rate | 25 | Above benchmark = 25, At benchmark = 17, Below = 10, Negligible = 3 | | Posting consistency | 15 | Regular schedule = 15, Sporadic = 10, Rare = 5, Abandoned = 0 | | Community building | 20 | Active community = 20, Some engagement = 13, Broadcast only = 7, None = 0 | #### Category 5: Email & Automation (Weight: 15%) Evaluate based on email marketing assessment. | Factor | Points Available | Criteria | |---|---|---| | List building mechanism | 20 | Multiple opt-ins = 20, One opt-in = 13, No visible opt-in = 5 | | Email design & content | 20 | Professional and engaging = 20, Adequate = 13, Needs work = 7 | | Automation sequences | 25 | Comprehensive = 25, Basic = 15, Minimal = 8, None = 0 | | Segmentation | 20 | Advanced = 20, Basic = 13, None = 5 | | Deliverability signals | 15 | Strong = 15, Adequate = 10, Concerning = 5, Problems = 0 | #### Category 6: Paid Advertising (Weight: 10%) Evaluate based on ad account audit (if applicable). | Factor | Points Available | Criteria | |---|---|---| | Campaign structure | 20 | Well-organized = 20, Adequate = 13, Messy = 7, None = 0 | | Targeting quality | 25 | Precise and layered = 25, Good = 17, Broad = 10, Wasteful = 3 | | Ad creative quality | 25 | Compelling and varied = 25, Adequate = 17, Weak = 10, Poor = 3 | | Landing page alignment | 15 | Perfect match = 15, Good = 10, Misaligned = 5, Broken = 0 | | Tracking & attribution | 15 | Comprehensive = 15, Basic = 10, Minimal = 5, Missing = 0 | #### Overall Score Calculation ``` Overall Score = (Website * 0.25) + (SEO * 0.20) + (Content * 0.15) + (Social * 0.15) + (Email * 0.15) + (Paid * 0.10) ``` **Score Interpretation:** | Score Range | Rating | Meaning | |---|---|---| | 85-100 | Excellent | Marketing is a competitive advantage. Optimize and scale. | | 70-84 | Good | Solid foundation with clear improvement opportunities. | | 55-69 | Average | Functional but leaving significant growth on the table. | | 40-54 | Below Average | Multiple areas need attention. Significant opportunity cost. | | 0-39 | Critical | Marketing is actively hurting growth. Immediate action required. | ### Step 3: Write Category Deep-Dives For each of the 6 categories, provide: 1. **Score and Rating** -- X/100 with interpretation 2. **Key Findings** -- 3-5 specific observations with evidence 3. **What's Working** -- Positive elements to preserve and build on 4. **Gaps and Issues** -- Problems identified with severity ratings 5. **Recommendations** -- Specific, actionable improvements ranked by impact 6. **Revenue Impact Estimate** -- Estimated financial impact of implementing recommendations **Revenue Impact Estimation Framework:** ``` Impact = (Estimated traffic change * Conversion rate change * Average deal value) * Confidence factor Example: - Current monthly traffic: 10,000 - Recommended SEO improvements could increase traffic 30%: +3,000 visits - Current conversion rate: 2%, CRO could improve to 3%: +1% = +130 conversions - Average deal value: $500 - Estimated monthly revenue impact: $65,000 - Confidence factor (conservative): 0.5 - Conservative estimate: $32,500/month additional revenue ``` ### Step 4: Competitor Comparison Summary If competitor data is available from `/market competitors`, include: **Competitive Positioning Matrix:** | Factor | Client | Competitor 1 | Competitor 2 | Competitor 3 | |---|---|---|---|---| | Website Quality | X/10 | X/10 | X/10 | X/10 | | SEO Visibility | X/10 | X/10 | X/10 | X/10 | | Content Quality | X/10 | X/10 | X/10 | X/10 | | Social Presence | X/10 | X/10 | X/10 | X/10 | | Overall Position | Xth/4 | Xth/4 | Xth/4 | Xth/4 | **Competitive Advantages:** What the client does better **Competitive Gaps:** Where competitors outperform the client **Opportunities:** Spaces competitors are not addressing ### Step 5: Content Quality Assessment Summarize content findings across all channels: - **Website copy** -- Clarity, persuasiveness, brand alignment - **Blog content** -- Depth, expertise, SEO optimization, publishing cadence - **Social media content** -- Engagement quality, brand consistency, platform optimization - **Email content** -- Subject line effectiveness, body copy quality, CTA strength - **Ad creative** -- Messaging clarity, visual quality, offer presentation ### Step 6: Conversion Optimization Summary Compile all conversion-related findings: - **Primary conversion paths** -- How visitors become customers - **Funnel leaks** -- Where potential customers drop off - **CRO quick wins** -- Changes that can be implemented immediately - **Testing opportunities** -- A/B tests recommended with hypotheses - **Benchmark comparison** -- Current rates vs industry standards ### Step 7: SEO Snapshot Summarize SEO health in a scannable format: ``` SEO Health Snapshot: - Title Tags: [Optimized / Needs Work / Missing] - Meta Descriptions: [Optimized / Needs Work / Missing] - H1 Tags: [Proper / Issues / Missing] - Image Alt Text: [Complete / Partial / Missing] - Page Speed: [Fast / Moderate / Slow] - Mobile-Friendly: [Yes / Partially / No] - Schema Markup: [Present / Partial / Missing] - Robots.txt: [Configured / Issues / Missing] - Sitemap: [Present / Issues / Missing] - HTTPS: [Yes / No] - Core Web Vitals: [Pass / Needs Work / Fail] ``` ### Step 8: Build the Prioritized Action Plan Organize all recommendations into three tiers: #### Quick Wins (Implement This Week) High impact, low effort changes. These should be implementable within 1-5 business days. Format each item as: ``` - [ ] [Action item]: [Specific description] - Impact: [HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW] - Effort: [1-5 hours] - Expected Result: [Specific outcome] - Revenue Impact: [$X/month estimated] ``` #### Medium-Term (Implement This Month) Moderate impact, moderate effort. These require 1-4 weeks. #### Strategic (Implement This Quarter) High impact, high effort. These are foundational changes that require planning and sustained effort. ### Step 9: Build the 30-60-90 Day Roadmap **Days 1-30: Foundation & Quick Wins** - Week 1: Implement all quick wins from the action plan - Week 2: Set up tracking and analytics baseline - Week 3: Begin medium-term improvements - Week 4: First performance review and adjustment **Days 31-60: Growth & Optimization** - Week 5-6: Launch core campaign improvements - Week 7: A/B testing program begins - Week 8: Content strategy implementation **Days 61-90: Scale & Expand** - Week 9-10: Scale what's working, cut what isn't - Week 11: Expand to new channels or campaigns - Week 12: Comprehensive review, update strategy for next quarter ### Step 10: Appendix Include methodology notes so the client understands how scores were derived: **Scoring Methodology:** - How each category was evaluated - Data sources used - Benchmarks referenced - Limitations and assumptions - Date of analysis **Tools Used:** - List any tools or scripts used in the analysis - Reference to scripts/analyze_page.py if used **Glossary:** - Define marketing terms that a non-marketer client may not know - Keep it relevant to terms used in the report ## Output Format Generate a file called `MARKETING-REPORT.md` with: ```markdown # Marketing Report ## [Company/Domain Name] ### Prepared by: [Agent/Agency Name] ### Date: [Date] --- ## Executive Summary ### Overall Marketing Score: [X/100] -- [Rating] [2-3 paragraph summary covering: current state assessment, top 3 findings, estimated revenue impact of implementing recommendations, and recommended first steps] ### Score Breakdown | Category | Score | Rating | |---|---|---| | Website & Conversion | X/100 | [Rating] | | SEO & Organic | X/100 | [Rating] | | Content & Messaging | X/100 | [Rating] | | Social Media | X/100 | [Rating] | | Email & Automation | X/100 | [Rating] | | Paid Advertising | X/100 | [Rating] | | **Overall** | **X/100** | **[Rating]** | ### Top 3 Priority Actions 1. [Most impactful recommendation with revenue estimate] 2. [Second most impactful recommendation] 3. [Third most impactful recommendation] --- ## Detailed Findings ### 1. Website & Conversion [X/100] [Deep-dive analysis with findings, what's working, gaps, recommendations] ### 2. SEO & Organic [X/100] [Deep-dive analysis] ### 3. Content & Messaging [X/100]
Auf GitHub ansehen
Diese SKILL.md ist sehr gross, daher zeigt SkillsMP hier nur den ersten Abschnitt. Auf GitHub ansehen