| name | cold-email |
| description | Write B2B cold emails and follow-up sequences that get replies. Use when the user wants to write cold outreach emails, prospecting emails, cold email campaigns, sales development emails, or SDR sequences. |
| allowed-tools | Read, Write, WebSearch, WebFetch, AskUserQuestion |
| model | sonnet |
Cold Email
Expert knowledge for writing B2B cold emails and sequences that get replies, book meetings, and start conversations at scale.
Core Principle
Cold email is a relevance game, not a volume game. One highly relevant email to 50 prospects outperforms one generic email to 500. Personalization is the variable that matters most.
The Anatomy of a High-Reply Cold Email
Structure:
- Subject line (open)
- Opening line (personalized hook — earns the next sentence)
- Bridge (connect their situation to your solution)
- Value prop (one sentence — specific outcome, not feature list)
- Proof point (one concrete example or number)
- CTA (one ask — low friction)
Total length: 3-5 sentences for the body. Under 150 words.
Subject Line Formulas
Subject lines determine open rate. They should be:
- Specific (not clever)
- Under 50 characters
- Relevant to their role/problem
Formulas that work:
- "[Company name] + [your product area]" — e.g., "Acme Corp + their onboarding drop-off"
- "Quick question about [their specific initiative]"
- "[Mutual connection] suggested I reach out"
- "Idea for [their team/problem]"
- "[Peer company] is doing this — are you?"
- "[Specific number] [outcome] for [their industry]"
Avoid:
- "Following up" (overused, signals a previous cold email chain)
- "Checking in"
- ALL CAPS
- Clickbait subject lines that don't match the body
- Generic: "Grow your revenue," "Increase conversions"
Opening Line Formulas
The opening line must make the prospect feel you actually know them — not that you merged their name from a CSV.
Tier 1 — Company-specific (highest effort, highest reply rate):
- "[Company] just raised a Series B — congratulations. Scaling [function] after a raise is..."
- "Saw your post about [topic] last week. You mentioned [specific point] — we've seen that a lot with [their type of company]."
- "I noticed [company] recently launched [product/feature]. Companies at this stage often struggle with..."
Tier 2 — Role/trigger-specific (medium effort, good reply rate):
- "As a [their title], you're probably spending a lot of time on [painful task]."
- "[Job posting for role X] tells me you're building out [function] — that usually means..."
- "I saw [company] is hiring [10+] salespeople. Growth at that pace usually creates [specific problem]."
Tier 3 — Industry-specific (lower effort, lower reply rate but scalable):
- "Most [role] at [industry] companies we talk to are dealing with [specific problem]."
Value Prop Compression
Compress your value prop to one sentence. If you can't, you don't understand it yet.
Formula: "[Product] helps [ICP] [achieve outcome] without [common sacrifice]."
Examples:
- "We help B2B SaaS companies reduce onboarding drop-off by 40% without hiring more CSMs."
- "We give growth teams one dashboard for all their paid channels so they stop spending 3 hours/week in spreadsheets."
Test: Can your prospect explain what you do to their colleague after reading this one sentence? If not, simplify.
Proof Point Selection
One specific, credible data point is worth more than three vague claims.
Good proof points:
- "We did this for [similar company type] — they went from 12% to 19% activation in 6 weeks."
- "[X] companies in [their industry] use us."
- "Reduced [specific metric] by [%] for [company type]."
Bad proof points:
- "Our customers love us."
- "We've helped hundreds of companies."
- "Industry-leading results."
Match the proof point to the prospect's likely concern. For early-stage prospects: speed of results. For enterprise: risk reduction and security. For volume-sensitive: scale and reliability.
CTA Design
One ask. Specific. Low friction.
Best CTAs for cold email:
- "Would it be worth a 15-minute call to see if this applies to [Company]?" (Yes/No question)
- "Can I send you a 2-minute video showing exactly how this works?"
- "Are you the right person to talk to about this, or would you recommend someone else?"
CTA principles:
- Yes/No questions outperform open-ended questions ("Would you be interested?" vs "Let's connect")
- Specific time commitment ("15 minutes" not "a quick call")
- Make the "no" easy — some of the best replies are "not us, but talk to [person]"
Follow-Up Sequence Architecture
Most replies come from follow-ups, not the first email. But each follow-up must add value, not just nag.
5-touch sequence:
| Touch | Timing | Content |
|---|
| Email 1 | Day 0 | Full pitch — problem + value + proof + CTA |
| Email 2 | Day 3 | New angle — different pain, different outcome framing |
| Email 3 | Day 7 | Social proof — case study, testimonial, or relevant stat |
| Email 4 | Day 14 | Content offer — relevant article, checklist, or resource |
| Email 5 | Day 21 | Break-up email — "I don't want to keep bugging you..." |
Break-up email formula:
"I've sent a few notes and haven't heard back — I'll assume the timing isn't right. If [problem] ever becomes a priority, we're at [email]. Rooting for [Company]."
Break-up emails often get replies because they remove pressure.
Personalization at Scale
True 1:1 personalization doesn't scale. Use a tiered personalization model:
Tier 1 (10% of list): Fully custom opening line for high-value accounts. Spend 5-10 minutes per prospect.
Tier 2 (30% of list): Trigger-based personalization. Use signals (job post, funding, product launch) to auto-populate opening line templates.
Tier 3 (60% of list): Segment personalization. One version per segment (industry, role, company size). Opening line references their segment, not their name.
Signal sources for personalization:
- LinkedIn activity (posts, job changes, company announcements)
- Job postings (what they're hiring for reveals their priorities)
- Funding announcements (Crunchbase, TechCrunch)
- G2 reviews (see what their customers say — mirrors their selling language)
- Recent news mentions
Deliverability: Technical Foundation
A great email that lands in spam is worthless.
Required setup:
Warm-up protocol for new domains:
- Week 1: 10-20 emails/day
- Week 2: 30-50 emails/day
- Week 3: 75-100 emails/day
- Week 4+: Scale to target volume
- Use warm-up tools: Lemwarm, Warmbox, Mailreach
Reputation signals to monitor:
- Bounce rate < 2% (clean your list with ZeroBounce or NeverBounce)
- Spam complaint rate < 0.1%
- Unsubscribe rate < 0.5%
Reply Rate Benchmarks
| Scenario | Expected Reply Rate |
|---|
| Generic mass email | < 1% |
| Segment-personalized | 2-5% |
| Trigger-based personalization | 5-10% |
| Full 1:1 personalization | 10-20% |
| Warm intro (referral) | 40-70% |
If reply rate is below 2%, fix the list quality or personalization before scaling volume.
Common Rationalizations
| Rationalization | Reality |
|---|
| "We need to send more emails to get more replies" | Volume amplifies a broken message. Fix reply rate first, then scale. |
| "Our product is complex — we need to explain it fully in email 1" | Nobody reads a wall of text from a stranger. You earn the right to explain more on a call. |
| "The follow-up emails should remind them what email 1 said" | Each email must stand alone and add new value. Reminders are annoying; new angles get replies. |
| "We'll personalize later when we have more resources" | Generic outreach at any scale has 0-1% reply rates. Personalization is a prerequisite, not a luxury. |
| "Deliverability is IT's problem" | Landing in spam = 0% deliverability. Sending domain setup is a marketing responsibility. |
Verification