Use for consequential handoffs, blockers, completion reports, requirements, procedures, interface content, or formal documentation that must be easy to act on.
Quellsprache: Englisch
Menü
SkillsMP hat 78 Skills aus douglance/sdlc-plugin gesammelt. Öffne einen Skill, um Quelle und Details zu prüfen.
Es werden 40 von 78 gesammelten Skills angezeigt.
Use for consequential handoffs, blockers, completion reports, requirements, procedures, interface content, or formal documentation that must be easy to act on.
Quellsprache: Englisch
Use when designing a public API, schema, module boundary, or frontend-backend contract.
Quellsprache: Englisch
Use when a failure's cause is unknown, evidence conflicts, or an initial fix did not solve the problem.
Quellsprache: Englisch
Use when tested code must be released with versioning, rollout, smoke checks, and a rollback path.
Quellsprache: Englisch
Use when a nontrivial change has unsettled interfaces, contracts, file structure, trade-offs, or verification boundaries.
Quellsprache: Englisch
Use to remove unnecessary generated patterns from the current diff without changing behavior.
Quellsprache: Englisch
Use when a consequential decision, public contract, or durable rationale must be recorded for future maintainers.
Quellsprache: Englisch
Use after behavior ships or an interface changes when documentation must be created, corrected, or verified against the source.
Quellsprache: Englisch
Use when unfamiliar technology or constraints require sourced options and feasibility evidence before choosing an approach.
Quellsprache: Englisch
Use when proliferating rules, exceptions, adapters, or workarounds suggest the underlying model may be wrong and a falsifiable simpler model is needed.
Quellsprache: Englisch
Use when building or restyling a user-facing web interface where art direction and production-quality visual execution matter.
Quellsprache: Englisch
Use for commits, branching, merge conflicts, versioning, or integration across parallel workstreams.
Quellsprache: Englisch
Use when requirements are clear and code must be added, changed, or fixed against an observable success criterion.
Quellsprache: Englisch
Use when implementation should be split into multiple independently verifiable slices or commits.
Quellsprache: Englisch
Use when the user explicitly wants a plan, design, specification, approach, or decision stress-tested through disciplined questions.
Quellsprache: Englisch
Use when the user wants a proposal stress-tested against the domain model while terminology and project decision records are updated.
Quellsprache: Englisch
Use to create or review a formal, traceable lifecycle artifact or phase handoff that another person or system must consume.
Quellsprache: Englisch
Use to remove dead code, duplication, indirection, or unnecessary complexity while preserving behavior.
Quellsprache: Englisch
Use when a live service needs observability, incident response, SLOs, runbooks, or continuity work.
Quellsprache: Englisch
Use when a measured regression, explicit performance target, or profiler evidence identifies work to optimize.
Quellsprache: Englisch
Use when an accepted specification or plan must become ordered tasks, vertical slices, atomic commits, or parallel work boundaries.
Quellsprache: Englisch
Use when a validated nontrivial change needs milestones, dependencies, risks, and an explicit out-of-scope boundary.
Quellsprache: Englisch
Use for independent verification, validation, inspection, and quality judgment beyond whether tests pass.
Quellsprache: Englisch
Use when a request is ambiguous, high-blast-radius, difficult to reverse, or missing a material product decision.
Quellsprache: Englisch
Use when a request spans multiple lifecycle phases or the correct next phase is unclear.
Quellsprache: Englisch
Use for authentication, authorization, secrets, untrusted input, sensitive storage, or an explicit security review.
Quellsprache: Englisch
Use when a significant change needs a durable specification before implementation can begin safely.
Quellsprache: Englisch
Use when a behavior change or defect is best defined and protected by a failing test before implementation.
Quellsprache: Englisch
Use after implementation to probe edge cases, failure modes, malformed input, scale, security, and contradictions.
Quellsprache: Englisch
Use when creating or reviewing a user-facing layout, state, illustration, document, slide, motion treatment, or rendered visual result.
Quellsprache: Englisch
Use for consequential handoffs, blockers, completion reports, requirements, procedures, interface content, or formal documentation that must be easy to act on.
Quellsprache: Englisch
Use when tested code must be released with versioning, rollout, smoke checks, and a rollback path.
Quellsprache: Englisch
Use when a nontrivial change has unsettled interfaces, contracts, file structure, trade-offs, or verification boundaries.
Quellsprache: Englisch
Use after behavior ships or an interface changes when documentation must be created, corrected, or verified against the source.
Quellsprache: Englisch
Use when unfamiliar technology or constraints require sourced options and feasibility evidence before choosing an approach.
Quellsprache: Englisch
Use when proliferating rules, exceptions, adapters, or workarounds suggest the underlying model may be wrong and a falsifiable simpler model is needed.
Quellsprache: Englisch
Use when building or restyling a user-facing web interface where art direction and production-quality visual execution matter.
Quellsprache: Englisch
Use when requirements are clear and code must be added, changed, or fixed against an observable success criterion.
Quellsprache: Englisch
Use when the user explicitly wants a plan, design, specification, approach, or decision stress-tested through disciplined questions.
Quellsprache: Englisch
Use when the user wants a proposal stress-tested against the domain model while terminology and project decision records are updated.
Quellsprache: Englisch