Skip to main content

skill-improve

Improve a skill using a test-fix-retest loop. Runs static checks, proposes targeted fixes, rewrites the skill, re-tests, and keeps or reverts based on score change.

Quellinformationen

Repository
Euraika-Labs/Codex-Code-Game-Studios
Letzte Quellaktivität
12. April 2026 um 17:42
Erkannte Sprache von SKILL.md
Englisch
Sterne
25
Forks
2

Installationsoptionen

Standardmäßig ist der Prompt ausgewählt, der zuerst die Quelle prüft. Sie können zu einem direkten Befehl wechseln oder eine lokale Kopie herunterladen.

Quelldateien prüfen

Lesen Sie SKILL.md und alle von SkillsMP angezeigten Begleitdateien, bevor Sie sich für eine Installation entscheiden.

Datei-Explorer
2 Dateien

SKILL.md wird angezeigt

SKILL.md
Quellanweisungen · Schreibgeschützte Vorschau
name
skill-improve
description
Improve a skill using a test-fix-retest loop. Runs static checks, proposes targeted fixes, rewrites the skill, re-tests, and keeps or reverts based on score change.
# Skill Improve Runs an improvement loop on a single skill: test → fix → retest → keep or revert. --- ## Phase 1: Parse Argument Read the skill name from the first argument. If missing, ask the user with a concise plain-text choice list instead of failing: ``` Which skill should I improve? [A] I'll provide a skill name [B] Stop here Example: $skill-improve tech-debt ``` Stop after asking. Do not continue until the user answers. Verify `.agents/skills/[name]/SKILL.md` exists. If not, stop with: "Skill '[name]' not found." --- ## Phase 2: Baseline Test Run `$skill-test static [name]` and record the baseline score: - Count of FAILs - Count of WARNs - Which specific checks failed (Check 1–7) Display to the user: ``` Static baseline: [N] failures, [M] warnings Failing: Check 4 (no ask-before-write), Check 5 (no handoff) ``` If baseline is 0 FAILs and 0 WARNs, note it and proceed to Phase 2b. ### Phase 2b: Category Baseline Look up the skill's `category:` field in `Codex Skill Testing Framework/catalog.yaml`. If no `category:` field is found, display: "Category: not yet assigned — skipping category checks." and skip to Phase 3. If category is found, run `$skill-test category [name]` and record the category baseline: - Count of FAILs - Count of WARNs - Which specific category rubric metrics failed Display to the user: ``` Category baseline: [N] failures, [M] warnings ([category] rubric) ``` If BOTH static and category baselines are 0 FAILs and 0 WARNs, stop: "This skill already passes all static and category checks. No improvements needed." --- ## Phase 3: Diagnose Read the full skill file at `.agents/skills/[name]/SKILL.md`. For each failing or warning **static** check, identify the exact gap: - **Check 1 fail** → which frontmatter field is missing - **Check 2 fail** → how many phases found vs. minimum required - **Check 3 fail** → no verdict keywords anywhere in the skill body - **Check 4 fail** → missing `agents/openai.yaml` metadata or one of the required keys - **Check 5 warn** → no ask-before-write language for a skill that edits files - **Check 6 warn** → no follow-up or next-step section at the end - **Check 7 fail/warn** → stale Codex wording (old skill paths, pseudo-tool references, or obsolete tool names) For each failing or warning **category** check (if category was assigned in Phase 2b), identify the exact gap in the skill's text. For example: - If G2 fails (gate mode, full directors not spawned): skill body never references all 4 PHASE-GATE director prompts - If A2 fails (authoring, no per-section May-I-write): skill asks once at the end, not before each section write - If T3 fails (team, BLOCKED not surfaced): skill doesn't halt dependent work on blocked agent Show the full combined diagnosis to the user before proposing any changes. --- ## Phase 4: Propose Fix Write a targeted fix for each failure and warning. Show the proposed changes as clearly marked before/after blocks. Only change what is failing — do not rewrite sections that are passing. Ask: "May I write this improved version to `.agents/skills/[name]/SKILL.md`?" If the user says no, stop here. --- ## Phase 5: Write and Retest Record the current content of the skill file (for revert if needed). Write the improved skill to `.agents/skills/[name]/SKILL.md`. Re-run `$skill-test static [name]` and record the new static score. If a category was assigned, also re-run `$skill-test category [name]` and record the new category score. Display the comparison: ``` Static: Before [N] failures, [M] warnings → After [N'] failures, [M'] warnings Category: Before [N] failures, [M] warnings → After [N'] failures, [M'] warnings (if applicable) Combined change: improved / no change / worse ``` --- ## Phase 6: Verdict Count the combined failure total: static FAILs + category FAILs + static WARNs + category WARNs. **If combined score improved (combined failure count is lower than baseline):** Report: "Score improved. Changes kept." Show a summary of what was fixed in each dimension. **If combined score is the same or worse:** Report: "Combined score did not improve." Show what changed and why it may not have helped. Ask: "May I revert `.agents/skills/[name]/SKILL.md` to HEAD?" If yes: restore the pre-edit snapshot you saved at the start of Phase 5 using `apply_patch`. Do not use destructive git checkout commands. --- ## Phase 7: Next Steps - Run `$skill-test static all` to find the next skill with failures. - Run `$skill-improve [next-name]` to continue the loop on another skill. - Run `$skill-test audit` to see overall coverage progress.
Auf GitHub ansehen