Skip to main content

ab-testing-patterns

A/B testing methodology for cold email optimization

Quellinformationen

Repository
MadAppGang/claude-code
Letzte Quellaktivität
20. Januar 2026 um 08:16
Erkannte Sprache von SKILL.md
Englisch
Sterne
286
Forks
24

Installationsoptionen

Standardmäßig ist der Prompt ausgewählt, der zuerst die Quelle prüft. Sie können zu einem direkten Befehl wechseln oder eine lokale Kopie herunterladen.

Quelldateien prüfen

Lesen Sie SKILL.md und alle von SkillsMP angezeigten Begleitdateien, bevor Sie sich für eine Installation entscheiden.

SKILL.md wird angezeigt

SKILL.md
Quellanweisungen · Schreibgeschützte Vorschau
name
ab-testing-patterns
version
1.0.0
description
A/B testing methodology for cold email optimization
plugin: instantly updated: 2026-01-20 # A/B Testing Patterns ## Testing Fundamentals ### One Variable at a Time **CRITICAL:** Only change one element per test for clear attribution. | Test Type | Variable | Keep Same | |-----------|----------|-----------| | Subject Line | Subject only | Body, CTA, timing | | Opening Line | First sentence | Subject, rest of body | | CTA | Call to action | Subject, body intro | | Send Time | Delivery time | All copy elements | ### Sample Size Requirements | Confidence Level | Minimum Sample per Variant | |------------------|----------------------------| | 90% | 100 | | 95% (standard) | 150 | | 99% | 200 | **Formula:** ``` sample_size = (Z^2 * p * (1-p)) / E^2 Where: Z = 1.96 for 95% confidence p = expected conversion rate (use 0.5 if unknown) E = margin of error (typically 0.05) ``` ## Subject Line Testing ### Test Categories | Category | Control Example | Variant Example | |----------|-----------------|-----------------| | Curiosity vs Specific | "Quick question" | "2 min about {{company}}'s pipeline" | | Personal vs Generic | "{{first_name}}, saw this" | "Your team might like this" | | Question vs Statement | "Struggling with X?" | "How we fixed X for [Company]" | | Short vs Medium | "Quick win?" | "{{first_name}}, 2 ideas for {{company}}" | ### Best Practices 1. **Test 2-3 variants maximum** - More variants require more sample 2. **Run for minimum 3 days** - Account for daily patterns 3. **Test during stable periods** - Avoid holidays, major events 4. **Document everything** - Record hypothesis, results, learnings ## Body Copy Testing ### Elements to Test | Element | Low-Lift | High-Lift | |---------|----------|-----------| | Opening hook | Different pain point | Different approach entirely | | Social proof | Different company name | No social proof | | Value proposition | Reframe benefit | Different benefit | | CTA | Soft vs hard ask | Different action | ### Copy Frameworks to Test **PAS vs AIDA:** - PAS: Problem-Agitate-Solution (emotional) - AIDA: Attention-Interest-Desire-Action (logical) **Test Hypothesis:** PAS performs better for pain-point-heavy ICPs, AIDA for solution-seekers. ## Timing Tests ### Variables to Test | Variable | Options to Test | |----------|-----------------| | Day of week | Tue vs Thu (typically best) | | Time of day | 8-10am vs 2-4pm | | Timezone | Send in prospect's local time vs batch send | | Sequence gaps | 2-day vs 3-day follow-up gaps | ### Default Schedule (Starting Point) ``` Optimal Sending Windows: Primary: Tuesday-Thursday, 9-11am local time Secondary: Tuesday-Thursday, 2-4pm local time Avoid: Monday morning, Friday afternoon ``` ## Statistical Significance ### Quick Significance Check | Total Sample | Lift Needed for 95% Confidence | |--------------|--------------------------------| | 200 (100 per variant) | 15%+ lift | | 500 (250 per variant) | 10%+ lift | | 1000 (500 per variant) | 7%+ lift | ### Decision Framework ``` IF lift >= 15% AND sample >= 100/variant: Declare winner with medium confidence IF lift >= 10% AND sample >= 250/variant: Declare winner with high confidence IF lift < 10% OR sample < 100/variant: Continue test or call it inconclusive ``` ## Implementing A/B Tests in Instantly ### Method 1: Split Leads 1. Export lead list 2. Randomly split into Variant A and Variant B groups 3. Create two identical campaigns with one variable different 4. Use `move_leads_to_campaign` to assign leads ### Method 2: Sequential Testing 1. Run Control for X days, collect metrics 2. Update campaign with Variant (`update_campaign_sequence`) 3. Run Variant for X days, collect metrics 4. Compare (less rigorous, use only if lead volume is limited) ### Tracking Results ```markdown ## A/B Test Log **Test ID**: {uuid} **Campaign**: {campaign_name} **Variable**: {what_was_tested} **Hypothesis**: {expected_outcome} **Control**: - Version: {control_description} - Sample: {n} - Open Rate: {x}% - Reply Rate: {y}% **Variant**: - Version: {variant_description} - Sample: {n} - Open Rate: {x}% - Reply Rate: {y}% **Result**: {Winner|Inconclusive} **Lift**: {z}% **Confidence**: {confidence}% **Learning**: {what_we_learned} ```
Auf GitHub ansehen