llms-txt

name	llms-txt
description	Generate and maintain llms.txt files for AI discoverability. Scans repos to create curated content maps that help AI answer engines surface your project accurately. Implements the llms.txt specification from Answer.AI.
license	MIT
origin	custom
author	Rebecca Rae Barton
author_url	https://github.com/thatrebeccarae
metadata	{"version":"1.0.0","category":"seo","domain":"ai-seo","updated":"2026-03-19T00:00:00.000Z","tested":"2026-03-19T00:00:00.000Z","tested_with":"Claude Code v2.1"}

llms.txt Generator

Generate and maintain llms.txt files that help AI answer engines surface your project accurately.

Install

git clone https://github.com/thatrebeccarae/claude-marketing.git && cp -r claude-marketing/skills/llms-txt ~/.claude/skills/

When to Use

• Launching a new open-source project or documentation site
• Major documentation restructure or content overhaul
• Improving your project's visibility in AI search (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews)
• Onboarding a project to AI-friendly discoverability standards
• Periodic refresh after significant repo changes

What Is llms.txt

llms.txt is a plain-text markdown file placed in a project's root that gives LLMs a curated map of the project's most important content. Think of it as robots.txt for AI comprehension — instead of telling crawlers where they can go, it tells them what matters and how the project is organized.

The specification was proposed by Answer.AI and is documented at llmstxt.org. Adoption is growing across developer tools, documentation sites, and open-source projects. Projects with an llms.txt are easier for AI to understand, cite, and recommend accurately.

Usage

/llms-txt generate [repo-path]

Scan a repository and generate a new llms.txt file. If no path is provided, uses the current working directory.

/llms-txt audit [repo-path]

Check an existing llms.txt for completeness, broken links, stale descriptions, and missing high-priority content. Produces a report with specific recommendations.

/llms-txt update [repo-path]

Refresh an existing llms.txt based on current repo state. Preserves manually curated descriptions while adding new content and removing references to deleted files.

Procedure

Step 1: Scan Repo Structure

Identify all documentation-relevant files in the repository:

• README.md (root and significant subdirectories)
• docs/ directory and its contents
• API documentation (OpenAPI specs, API reference pages)
• Tutorials, guides, and getting-started content
• CHANGELOG.md, CONTRIBUTING.md, FAQ.md
• Architecture and design decision docs
• Configuration and deployment guides
• Example directories with their own READMEs

Step 2: Prioritize Content

Rank discovered content by importance to an LLM trying to understand the project:

Priority	Content Type	Why It Matters
P0	README, Getting Started, API Reference	Entry points — what the project is and how to use it
P1	Tutorials, Guides, Architecture docs	Deeper understanding — how it works and common workflows
P2	CHANGELOG, CONTRIBUTING, FAQ, Config docs	Supporting context — history, community, troubleshooting

Step 3: Extract Metadata

For each content page, extract or write:

• Title: Clear, descriptive page title
• URL or path: Where to find the content (full URL for hosted docs, relative path for repo files)
• Description: One-line action-oriented summary of what the page covers

Step 4: Generate llms.txt

Assemble the file following the specification format:

1. Title line: # Project Name
2. Description block: 2-3 sentence summary of what the project does, who it is for, and its primary use case
3. Sections: Group content logically (e.g., "Getting Started", "API", "Guides", "Community")
4. Content items: Each item is a markdown link with a colon-separated description

See REFERENCE.md for the exact format specification.

Step 5: Optionally Generate llms-full.txt

For projects that benefit from it, generate an expanded version that inlines the actual content of key pages. This is useful for smaller projects where the full documentation fits in a single context window.

Step 6: User Review

Present the generated llms.txt for review. Flag any decisions made during curation:

• Content that was excluded and why
• Descriptions that were inferred vs extracted from existing metadata
• Sections where additional documentation would improve AI discoverability

Step 7: Write to Repo Root

Save llms.txt (and optionally llms-full.txt) to the repository root.

For projects with hosted documentation sites, also note the recommended placement for the hosted version (site root, e.g., https://docs.example.com/llms.txt).

Hosted Docs and GitHub Pages

If the project has a documentation site (GitHub Pages, ReadTheDocs, Docusaurus, etc.):

• Generate llms.txt with full URLs pointing to the hosted docs, not repo file paths
• Place the file where it will be served at https://yourdomain.com/llms.txt
• For GitHub Pages: add llms.txt to the docs source directory so it deploys automatically
• Consider adding llms.txt to your sitemap or linking it from robots.txt

Key Principles

1. Curate, don't dump. An llms.txt that lists every file in the repo is worse than useless. Select the 10-30 most important pages that give an LLM the clearest picture of the project.
2. Prioritize entry points. The first few items should answer: what is this, who is it for, and how do I start?
3. Keep descriptions action-oriented. "How to configure authentication for SSO providers" beats "Authentication configuration page."
4. Match the reader's mental model. Organize sections the way a newcomer would learn the project, not the way the repo is structured.
5. Maintain freshness. Stale llms.txt with broken links or outdated descriptions erodes trust. Run /llms-txt audit after major documentation changes.

Integration with Other Skills

• aeo-geo-optimizer — llms.txt complements broader AI search optimization; use both for maximum AI discoverability
• technical-seo-audit — Ensure AI crawlers can access your docs before generating llms.txt
• github-readme — A strong README is the foundation of a good llms.txt; optimize it first

For the full specification format, priority ranking criteria, and placement guidance, see REFERENCE.md.