Skip to main content

mascot-intake

Read project, account or folder evidence and normalize an original mascot brief before three-candidate art direction; exclude personal-photo asset packs.

Zur Installation springen

Quellinformationen

Repository
yang0/mascot-ip-studio
Letzte Quellaktivität
27. August 2026 um 15:10
Erkannte Sprache von SKILL.md
Englisch
Sterne
8
Forks
2

Installationsoptionen

Standardmäßig ist der Prompt ausgewählt, der zuerst die Quelle prüft. Sie können zu einem direkten Befehl wechseln oder eine lokale Kopie herunterladen.

Quelldateien prüfen

Lesen Sie SKILL.md und alle von SkillsMP angezeigten Begleitdateien, bevor Sie sich für eine Installation entscheiden.

Datei-Explorer
2 Dateien

SKILL.md wird angezeigt

SKILL.md
Quellanweisungen · Schreibgeschützte Vorschau
name
mascot-intake
description
Read project, account or folder evidence and normalize an original mascot brief before three-candidate art direction; exclude personal-photo asset packs.
# Mascot Intake Produce a factual handoff; do not design or render. This node handles original mascots for projects, products, brands, accounts and folders. A request for a photo-based portrait, avatar or reusable asset set of the user or an authorized person belongs to `personal-ip-image-pack`. ## Input contract Accept conversation history plus any local project/account/folder path, URL, attachment, screenshot or 1–3 sentence project description. Read accessible materials before asking anything. Reuse confirmed context and never make the user repeat it. ## Procedure 1. Read the supplied materials and confirm project context, purpose, audience, personality, must-keep, must-avoid, references and explicitly requested exaggeration. Record facts separately from assumptions. 2. If the materials are readable, infer the mascot role and useful subject constraints for the design director. Do not ask the user to choose a species or visual style merely because the materials do not name one; those are director decisions unless the user has explicitly constrained them. 3. Ask only one concise question when unreadable or missing information would materially change the next stage. Do not ask a delivery-scope question. 4. Apply the fixed project output: three different square full-body candidate images A/B/C. A/B/C are internal planning/rendering labels and are not a user approval gate. 5. After delivery, a bare A/B/C choice routes revision/continued feedback only; it cannot create a final asset. Explicit final wording is handled only after QA by the root/review flow. ## Output contract Return `project_context`, `confirmed_brief`, unresolved conflicts and `next_stage`. Return `next_stage: direction_planning` when ready. If context is missing, return `next_stage: intake`.
Auf GitHub ansehen