| name | multi-worldview-comparison |
| description | Multi-worldview comparison — CATWOE from multiple perspectives, reframing matrix across professional lenses, identify overlooked framings. Reveals what single-perspective analysis misses. |
| execution | tactic |
| dependencies | {"sops":["appreciative-discovery","catwoe-analysis","deep-insight-multi-stakeholder-simulation","reframing-matrix"]} |
Multi-Worldview Comparison
See what single-perspective analysis misses.
Operations
catwoe-analysis → reframing-matrix → appreciative-discovery (optional)
Available SOPs
Subagent: catwoe-analysis, reframing-matrix, appreciative-discovery
Shared: multi-stakeholder-simulation
Execution Guidance
Apply CATWOE (Customers, Actors, Transformation, Weltanschauung, Owner, Environment) from at least 4 stakeholder perspectives, then use reframing matrix (engineer, social scientist, artist, economist or domain-appropriate equivalents) to see what each profession would focus on.
Key insight: the problem looks fundamentally different from each perspective. The "real" problem is the intersection of all perspectives, not any single one.
Minimum Yield
<HARD-GATE>
- CATWOE analyses completed: >= 3 perspectives
- Reframing matrix perspectives: >= 4
- Overlooked framings identified: >= 2
- Synthesis of cross-perspective insights: >= 1
</HARD-GATE>
Available SOPs
Optional, no fixed order; the final leaf is always a sop.
| SOP | When to use |
|---|
| appreciative-discovery | Search for positive deviants and extract transferable principles using Appreciative Inquiry. |
| catwoe-analysis | Apply Checkland's CATWOE analysis from a specific stakeholder perspective to reveal how the problem looks from that viewpoint. |
| deep-insight-multi-stakeholder-simulation | Simulate multiple stakeholder perspectives evaluating a research gap, method, or proposal. Identifies blind spots from single-perspective analysis. |
| reframing-matrix | Reframe the problem from 4 professional perspectives to reveal what each discipline would focus on. |
