Skip to main content

code-impact-analysis

Analyze code impact before refactors, behavior changes, API changes, and cross-module edits. Use when missing a caller, schema consumer, route, or state dependency could break the product.

Datos de origen

Repositorio
777genius/universal-agent-plugins-registry
Última actividad en el origen
7 de agosto de 2026 a las 13:57
Idioma detectado de SKILL.md
inglés
Estrellas
3
Forks
0

Opciones de instalación

De forma predeterminada está seleccionado el prompt que primero revisa el origen. Puedes cambiar a un comando directo o descargar una copia local.

Revisa los archivos de origen

Lee SKILL.md y los archivos complementarios que muestra SkillsMP antes de decidir si quieres instalarlo.

Mostrando SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Instrucciones de origen · Vista previa de solo lectura
name
code-impact-analysis
description
Analyze code impact before refactors, behavior changes, API changes, and cross-module edits. Use when missing a caller, schema consumer, route, or state dependency could break the product.
license
Apache-2.0
compatibility
Requires a local code workspace. Uses rg first; Semble, Serena, and CodeGraphContext are optional.
# Code Impact Analysis Build a verified impact set before editing shared behavior or public contracts. 1. Locate the definition with an LSP tool or `rg`. 2. Find exact call sites and serialized field names with `rg`. 3. Find type-aware references with Serena or the language server. 4. Ask CGC for callers, callees, dependencies, and complexity when indexed. 5. Use Semble to find conceptually similar patterns that exact search may miss. 6. Read every high-risk caller and decide the minimum edit set. 7. Identify focused tests, type checks, migrations, and user-visible verification. Examples: ```bash rg -n "symbolName\\(" . uvx --from semble==0.5.4 semble search "similar usage of symbolName" . cgc analyze callers symbolName --context "$(basename "$PWD")" cgc analyze calls symbolName --context "$(basename "$PWD")" ``` When tools disagree, inspect the conflicting results. Generated code, dynamic dispatch, framework conventions, or an incomplete index can explain the gap. Never reduce the impact set solely because a graph or semantic search returned few results.
Ver en GitHub