Skip to main content

write-a-bug-report

Turn an observed software defect into a concise, reproducible engineering report with evidence, scope, and expected behavior. Use when a product, website, API, script, or device behaves incorrectly and another person must investigate it.

Datos de origen

Repositorio
protosphinx/sphinxstack
Última actividad en el origen
29 de julio de 2026 a las 13:55
Idioma detectado de SKILL.md
inglés
Estrellas
3
Forks
0

Opciones de instalación

De forma predeterminada está seleccionado el prompt que primero revisa el origen. Puedes cambiar a un comando directo o descargar una copia local.

Revisa los archivos de origen

Lee SKILL.md y los archivos complementarios que muestra SkillsMP antes de decidir si quieres instalarlo.

Explorador de archivos
2 archivos

Mostrando SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Instrucciones de origen · Vista previa de solo lectura
name
write-a-bug-report
category
write
description
Turn an observed software defect into a concise, reproducible engineering report with evidence, scope, and expected behavior. Use when a product, website, API, script, or device behaves incorrectly and another person must investigate it.
# write-a-bug-report Create a report that proves the observed gap without guessing at root cause. Preserve the smallest evidence another person needs to reproduce, prioritize, and verify a fix. ## Inputs - Gather the affected product, version, environment, time, account-safe context, and user goal. - Preserve exact steps, inputs, outputs, messages, logs, screenshots, recording, and frequency where available. - Confirm expected behavior from a specification, prior behavior, design, test, or responsible owner. ## Procedure 1. Write a searchable title using the visible failure and affected area. 2. State the user or system impact before the reproduction details. 3. List minimal numbered steps from a known starting state. 4. Record expected and actual results separately, using exact text and values. 5. Include environment, version, browser or device, configuration, and time window that may matter. 6. State frequency and the number of attempts; distinguish always, intermittent, and not retested. 7. Attach the smallest privacy-safe evidence and link related incidents, regressions, or duplicates. 8. Record workaround, affected scope, and conditions where the problem does not occur. 9. Remove root-cause claims unless directly proven and label hypotheses. 10. Ask a second person or clean environment to follow the report. ## Boundaries Never include credentials, secrets, full customer data, or unnecessary production records. Do not change state, stress a live system, or repeat a destructive action only to improve the report. Follow the security process for vulnerabilities and private exposure. ## Done - A second person can reproduce the actual result from the written steps or the limitation is recorded - Expected behavior has a cited source and is not merely preference - Environment, frequency, impact, workaround, and privacy-safe evidence are included - Root cause remains a hypothesis unless a separate investigation has proved it
Ver en GitHub