Skip to main content

write-a-bug-report

Turn an observed software defect into a concise, reproducible engineering report with evidence, scope, and expected behavior. Use when a product, website, API, script, or device behaves incorrectly and another person must investigate it.

Informações da origem

Repositório
protosphinx/sphinxstack
Última atividade na origem
29 de julho de 2026 às 13:55
Idioma detectado do SKILL.md
inglês
Estrelas
3
Forks
0

Opções de instalação

Por padrão, está selecionado o prompt que primeiro revisa a origem. Você pode mudar para um comando direto ou baixar uma cópia local.

Revise os arquivos de origem

Leia o SKILL.md e os arquivos complementares exibidos pelo SkillsMP antes de decidir se vai instalar.

Explorador de arquivos
2 arquivos

Exibindo SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Instruções da origem · Visualização somente leitura
name
write-a-bug-report
category
write
description
Turn an observed software defect into a concise, reproducible engineering report with evidence, scope, and expected behavior. Use when a product, website, API, script, or device behaves incorrectly and another person must investigate it.
# write-a-bug-report Create a report that proves the observed gap without guessing at root cause. Preserve the smallest evidence another person needs to reproduce, prioritize, and verify a fix. ## Inputs - Gather the affected product, version, environment, time, account-safe context, and user goal. - Preserve exact steps, inputs, outputs, messages, logs, screenshots, recording, and frequency where available. - Confirm expected behavior from a specification, prior behavior, design, test, or responsible owner. ## Procedure 1. Write a searchable title using the visible failure and affected area. 2. State the user or system impact before the reproduction details. 3. List minimal numbered steps from a known starting state. 4. Record expected and actual results separately, using exact text and values. 5. Include environment, version, browser or device, configuration, and time window that may matter. 6. State frequency and the number of attempts; distinguish always, intermittent, and not retested. 7. Attach the smallest privacy-safe evidence and link related incidents, regressions, or duplicates. 8. Record workaround, affected scope, and conditions where the problem does not occur. 9. Remove root-cause claims unless directly proven and label hypotheses. 10. Ask a second person or clean environment to follow the report. ## Boundaries Never include credentials, secrets, full customer data, or unnecessary production records. Do not change state, stress a live system, or repeat a destructive action only to improve the report. Follow the security process for vulnerabilities and private exposure. ## Done - A second person can reproduce the actual result from the written steps or the limitation is recorded - Expected behavior has a cited source and is not merely preference - Environment, frequency, impact, workaround, and privacy-safe evidence are included - Root cause remains a hypothesis unless a separate investigation has proved it
Ver no GitHub