Skip to main content

write-a-bug-report

Turn an observed software defect into a concise, reproducible engineering report with evidence, scope, and expected behavior. Use when a product, website, API, script, or device behaves incorrectly and another person must investigate it.

Quellinformationen

Repository
protosphinx/sphinxstack
Letzte Quellaktivität
29. Juli 2026 um 13:55
Erkannte Sprache von SKILL.md
Englisch
Sterne
3
Forks
0

Installationsoptionen

Standardmäßig ist der Prompt ausgewählt, der zuerst die Quelle prüft. Sie können zu einem direkten Befehl wechseln oder eine lokale Kopie herunterladen.

Quelldateien prüfen

Lesen Sie SKILL.md und alle von SkillsMP angezeigten Begleitdateien, bevor Sie sich für eine Installation entscheiden.

Datei-Explorer
2 Dateien

SKILL.md wird angezeigt

SKILL.md
Quellanweisungen · Schreibgeschützte Vorschau
name
write-a-bug-report
category
write
description
Turn an observed software defect into a concise, reproducible engineering report with evidence, scope, and expected behavior. Use when a product, website, API, script, or device behaves incorrectly and another person must investigate it.
# write-a-bug-report Create a report that proves the observed gap without guessing at root cause. Preserve the smallest evidence another person needs to reproduce, prioritize, and verify a fix. ## Inputs - Gather the affected product, version, environment, time, account-safe context, and user goal. - Preserve exact steps, inputs, outputs, messages, logs, screenshots, recording, and frequency where available. - Confirm expected behavior from a specification, prior behavior, design, test, or responsible owner. ## Procedure 1. Write a searchable title using the visible failure and affected area. 2. State the user or system impact before the reproduction details. 3. List minimal numbered steps from a known starting state. 4. Record expected and actual results separately, using exact text and values. 5. Include environment, version, browser or device, configuration, and time window that may matter. 6. State frequency and the number of attempts; distinguish always, intermittent, and not retested. 7. Attach the smallest privacy-safe evidence and link related incidents, regressions, or duplicates. 8. Record workaround, affected scope, and conditions where the problem does not occur. 9. Remove root-cause claims unless directly proven and label hypotheses. 10. Ask a second person or clean environment to follow the report. ## Boundaries Never include credentials, secrets, full customer data, or unnecessary production records. Do not change state, stress a live system, or repeat a destructive action only to improve the report. Follow the security process for vulnerabilities and private exposure. ## Done - A second person can reproduce the actual result from the written steps or the limitation is recorded - Expected behavior has a cited source and is not merely preference - Environment, frequency, impact, workaround, and privacy-safe evidence are included - Root cause remains a hypothesis unless a separate investigation has proved it
Auf GitHub ansehen