Skip to main content

engineering-skills

Route project-instruction initialization, planning, implementation, independent PR review, structural review, and GitHub PR creation requests to the matching bundled workflow. Use when the user invokes engineering-skills or asks to choose an engineering workflow.

ソース情報

リポジトリ
igorrendulic/engineering-skills
ソースの最終更新活動
2026年10月12日 20:59
検出された SKILL.md の言語
英語
スター
0
フォーク
0

インストール方法

デフォルトでは、最初にソースを確認する Prompt が選択されています。直接コマンドに切り替えるか、ローカルコピーをダウンロードすることもできます。

ソースファイルを確認

インストールを決める前に、SKILL.md と SkillsMP に表示されている付属ファイルをお読みください。

SKILL.md を表示中

SKILL.md
ソースの指示 · 読み取り専用プレビュー
name
engineering-skills
description
Route project-instruction initialization, planning, implementation, independent PR review, structural review, and GitHub PR creation requests to the matching bundled workflow. Use when the user invokes engineering-skills or asks to choose an engineering workflow.
# Engineering Skills Dispatcher Load the requested workflow before acting on its target. ## Available workflows | Command | Instructions | | --- | --- | | `init` | `skills/init/SKILL.md` | | `plan` | `skills/plan/SKILL.md` | | `implementation` | `skills/implementation/SKILL.md` | | `pr-review` | `skills/pr-review/SKILL.md` | | `structural-review` | `skills/structural-review/SKILL.md` | | `github-pr` | `skills/github-pr/SKILL.md` | ## Dispatch 1. Honor an explicitly selected workflow, whether named after `$engineering-skills` (or `/engineering-skills`) or in prose. Accept `structural review` as an alias for `structural-review` and `PR review` for `pr-review`. An explicitly requested unsupported command is an error: show available workflows without guessing a replacement or file path. 2. Without an explicit selection, infer the workflow from the requested action and current conversation when one workflow clearly fits. For example, "use engineering-skills to implement this plan" selects `implementation`, while "assess this plan for unnecessary abstractions" selects `structural-review`. "Review this implementation for correctness" or "review this PR" selects `pr-review`, including branch/worktree reviews before a PR exists. "Review and fix this PR" or "fix these review findings" selects `implementation` and its review-and-fix loop; an explicitly selected `pr-review` routes such requests there as well. Creating, publishing, or editing PR metadata selects `github-pr`. Creating or conservatively updating root `AGENTS.md` project instructions selects `init`. This initializes agent instructions, not an application: application scaffolding follows `plan` or `implementation` as appropriate. A bare "initialize this project" is ambiguous; clarify which outcome is wanted. Route by the requested action, not a keyword in its target. 3. If the request is bare or ambiguous, show the relevant workflows and ask which one to run before acting. A generic code review selects `pr-review`; a design or dedicated complexity/ownership review selects `structural-review`. If asked to recommend a workflow only, explain the choice without executing it. 4. Read the **entire** selected `SKILL.md` using the path relative to this file's directory. If it or a required reference cannot be read, explain the installation problem rather than substituting generic instructions. 5. Follow that workflow's instructions, using the user's remaining request as its target and scope. Preserve read-only constraints and existing authorization; selecting a workflow does not authorize additional actions. ## Adding workflows Add a subdirectory under `skills/` containing a `SKILL.md`, then register its command and relative path in the table above. Keep this layout, including the root `references/` directory, when installing the dispatcher; `plan` and `implementation` depend on the shared plan lifecycle reference and the sibling `structural-review` skill. PR repair also depends on the sibling `pr-review` and `implementation` skills.
GitHubで見る