Skip to main content

engineering-skills

Route engineering-skills requests to bundled initialization, planning, implementation, review, PR, or usage-help workflows. Use when the user invokes the standalone engineering-skills dispatcher or asks which bundled workflow to use.

Informações da origem

Repositório
igorrendulic/engineering-skills
Última atividade na origem
15 de outubro de 2026 às 20:00
Idioma detectado do SKILL.md
inglês
Estrelas
1
Forks
0

Opções de instalação

Por padrão, está selecionado o prompt que primeiro revisa a origem. Você pode mudar para um comando direto ou baixar uma cópia local.

Revise os arquivos de origem

Leia o SKILL.md e os arquivos complementares exibidos pelo SkillsMP antes de decidir se vai instalar.

Exibindo SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Instruções da origem · Visualização somente leitura
name
engineering-skills
description
Route engineering-skills requests to bundled initialization, planning, implementation, review, PR, or usage-help workflows. Use when the user invokes the standalone engineering-skills dispatcher or asks which bundled workflow to use.
# Engineering Skills Dispatcher Load the requested workflow before acting on its target. A bare invocation or usage question selects help without executing another workflow. ## Available workflows This table is the shared catalog for the dispatcher and help. Instruction paths are relative to this file; example targets follow the selected command. | Command | Instructions | Purpose | Example target | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | `init` | `skills/init/SKILL.md` | Create or update root project instructions. | Initialize this project's AGENTS.md | | `plan` | `skills/plan/SKILL.md` | Define success, review the design, and order verifiable tasks. | Add password reset | | `implementation` | `skills/implementation/SKILL.md` | Implement, verify, and repair changes within scope. | Implement the password-reset plan | | `pr-review` | `skills/pr-review/SKILL.md` | Independently review correctness and regressions. | Review the password-reset changes | | `structural-review` | `skills/structural-review/SKILL.md` | Assess complexity, reuse, and ownership in designs or code. | Assess the password-reset design | | `github-pr` | `skills/github-pr/SKILL.md` | Prepare branches, commits, and pull requests. | Create a PR for these changes | | `help` | `skills/help/SKILL.md` | Explain workflows and usage without executing them. | plan | ## Dispatch 1. Handle a bare `$engineering-skills` (or `/engineering-skills`), `help`, `help <workflow>`, and usage-only questions by reading `skills/help/SKILL.md`. Pass the topic, if any, and use standalone invocation examples. Do not run the workflow being explained. This takes precedence over action inference below. 2. Honor an explicitly selected workflow, whether named after `$engineering-skills` (or `/engineering-skills`) or in prose. Accept `structural review` as an alias for `structural-review` and `PR review` for `pr-review`. An explicitly requested unsupported command is an error: show available workflows without guessing a replacement or file path. 3. Without an explicit selection, infer the workflow from the requested action and current conversation when one workflow clearly fits. For example, "use engineering-skills to implement this plan" selects `implementation`, while "assess this plan for unnecessary abstractions" selects `structural-review`. "Review this implementation for correctness" or "review this PR" selects `pr-review`, including branch/worktree reviews before a PR exists. "Review and fix this PR" or "fix these review findings" selects `implementation` and its review-and-fix loop; an explicitly selected `pr-review` routes such requests there as well. Creating, publishing, or editing PR metadata selects `github-pr`. Creating or conservatively updating root `AGENTS.md` project instructions selects `init`. This initializes agent instructions, not an application: application scaffolding follows `plan` or `implementation` as appropriate. A bare "initialize this project" is ambiguous; clarify which outcome is wanted. Route by the requested action, not a keyword in its target. 4. If an action request is ambiguous, show the relevant workflows and ask which one to run before acting. A generic code review selects `pr-review`; a design or dedicated complexity/ownership review selects `structural-review`. If asked to recommend a workflow only, explain the choice without executing it. 5. Read the **entire** selected `SKILL.md` using the path relative to this file's directory. If it or a required reference cannot be read, explain the installation problem rather than substituting generic instructions. 6. Follow that workflow's instructions, using the user's remaining request as its target and scope. Preserve read-only constraints and existing authorization; selecting a workflow does not authorize additional actions. ## Adding workflows Add a subdirectory under `skills/` containing a `SKILL.md`, then register its command and relative path in the table above. Keep this layout, including the root `references/` directory, when installing the dispatcher; `plan` and `implementation` depend on the shared plan lifecycle reference and the sibling `structural-review` skill. PR repair also depends on the sibling `pr-review` and `implementation` skills.
Ver no GitHub