Skip to main content

engineering-skills

Route engineering-skills requests to bundled initialization, planning, implementation, review, PR, or usage-help workflows. Use when the user invokes the standalone engineering-skills dispatcher or asks which bundled workflow to use.

来源信息

仓库
igorrendulic/engineering-skills
最近来源活动
2026年10月15日 20:00
检测到的 SKILL.md 语言
英语
星标
1
Forks
0

安装方式

默认使用会先检查来源的 Prompt;你也可以切换为直接命令,或下载本地副本。

检查来源文件

决定是否安装前,请先阅读 SKILL.md,以及 SkillsMP 当前展示的配套文件。

正在显示 SKILL.md

SKILL.md
来源说明 · 只读预览
name
engineering-skills
description
Route engineering-skills requests to bundled initialization, planning, implementation, review, PR, or usage-help workflows. Use when the user invokes the standalone engineering-skills dispatcher or asks which bundled workflow to use.
# Engineering Skills Dispatcher Load the requested workflow before acting on its target. A bare invocation or usage question selects help without executing another workflow. ## Available workflows This table is the shared catalog for the dispatcher and help. Instruction paths are relative to this file; example targets follow the selected command. | Command | Instructions | Purpose | Example target | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | `init` | `skills/init/SKILL.md` | Create or update root project instructions. | Initialize this project's AGENTS.md | | `plan` | `skills/plan/SKILL.md` | Define success, review the design, and order verifiable tasks. | Add password reset | | `implementation` | `skills/implementation/SKILL.md` | Implement, verify, and repair changes within scope. | Implement the password-reset plan | | `pr-review` | `skills/pr-review/SKILL.md` | Independently review correctness and regressions. | Review the password-reset changes | | `structural-review` | `skills/structural-review/SKILL.md` | Assess complexity, reuse, and ownership in designs or code. | Assess the password-reset design | | `github-pr` | `skills/github-pr/SKILL.md` | Prepare branches, commits, and pull requests. | Create a PR for these changes | | `help` | `skills/help/SKILL.md` | Explain workflows and usage without executing them. | plan | ## Dispatch 1. Handle a bare `$engineering-skills` (or `/engineering-skills`), `help`, `help <workflow>`, and usage-only questions by reading `skills/help/SKILL.md`. Pass the topic, if any, and use standalone invocation examples. Do not run the workflow being explained. This takes precedence over action inference below. 2. Honor an explicitly selected workflow, whether named after `$engineering-skills` (or `/engineering-skills`) or in prose. Accept `structural review` as an alias for `structural-review` and `PR review` for `pr-review`. An explicitly requested unsupported command is an error: show available workflows without guessing a replacement or file path. 3. Without an explicit selection, infer the workflow from the requested action and current conversation when one workflow clearly fits. For example, "use engineering-skills to implement this plan" selects `implementation`, while "assess this plan for unnecessary abstractions" selects `structural-review`. "Review this implementation for correctness" or "review this PR" selects `pr-review`, including branch/worktree reviews before a PR exists. "Review and fix this PR" or "fix these review findings" selects `implementation` and its review-and-fix loop; an explicitly selected `pr-review` routes such requests there as well. Creating, publishing, or editing PR metadata selects `github-pr`. Creating or conservatively updating root `AGENTS.md` project instructions selects `init`. This initializes agent instructions, not an application: application scaffolding follows `plan` or `implementation` as appropriate. A bare "initialize this project" is ambiguous; clarify which outcome is wanted. Route by the requested action, not a keyword in its target. 4. If an action request is ambiguous, show the relevant workflows and ask which one to run before acting. A generic code review selects `pr-review`; a design or dedicated complexity/ownership review selects `structural-review`. If asked to recommend a workflow only, explain the choice without executing it. 5. Read the **entire** selected `SKILL.md` using the path relative to this file's directory. If it or a required reference cannot be read, explain the installation problem rather than substituting generic instructions. 6. Follow that workflow's instructions, using the user's remaining request as its target and scope. Preserve read-only constraints and existing authorization; selecting a workflow does not authorize additional actions. ## Adding workflows Add a subdirectory under `skills/` containing a `SKILL.md`, then register its command and relative path in the table above. Keep this layout, including the root `references/` directory, when installing the dispatcher; `plan` and `implementation` depend on the shared plan lifecycle reference and the sibling `structural-review` skill. PR repair also depends on the sibling `pr-review` and `implementation` skills.
在 GitHub 查看