Skip to main content

write-a-research-proposal

Write a research proposal that connects a bounded gap to a justified method, ethics, data plan, schedule, resources, risks, and feasible contribution. Use when seeking approval, supervision, funding, or project direction.

ソース情報

リポジトリ
protosphinx/sphinxstack
ソースの最終更新活動
2026年7月29日 13:55
検出された SKILL.md の言語
英語
スター
3
フォーク
0

インストール方法

デフォルトでは、最初にソースを確認する Prompt が選択されています。直接コマンドに切り替えるか、ローカルコピーをダウンロードすることもできます。

ソースファイルを確認

インストールを決める前に、SKILL.md と SkillsMP に表示されている付属ファイルをお読みください。

ファイルエクスプローラー
2 ファイル

SKILL.md を表示中

SKILL.md
ソースの指示 · 読み取り専用プレビュー
name
write-a-research-proposal
category
school
description
Write a research proposal that connects a bounded gap to a justified method, ethics, data plan, schedule, resources, risks, and feasible contribution. Use when seeking approval, supervision, funding, or project direction.
# write-a-research-proposal Make the proposed evidence capable of answering the stated question. ## When to use - Use for theses, dissertations, grants, capstones, independent studies, or internal research. - Do not claim approvals, access, partnerships, data, or results that have not been confirmed. ## Procedure 1. Confirm audience, format, evaluation criteria, word limit, deadline, and required attachments. 2. Define the problem, context, research gap, question, objectives, and practical or scholarly significance. 3. Synthesize the most relevant evidence and show where uncertainty remains without manufacturing novelty. 4. State conceptual framework, definitions, scope, and expected contribution. 5. Justify design, sampling, measures, procedure, analysis, quality controls, and alternatives. 6. Address ethics, consent, safety, privacy, data governance, inclusion, and required permissions. 7. Build a staged schedule with dependencies, review points, recruitment or access lead time, and contingency. 8. Estimate people, equipment, software, travel, participant, repository, and dissemination resources. 9. Record risks, feasibility evidence, limitations, fallback scope, and stopping conditions. 10. Cross-check question, method, budget, schedule, and claimed outputs for consistency. ## Worked example A proposal promises national conclusions from interviews at one accessible site. Review narrows the question to that setting, explains purposeful sampling, adds a transferability boundary, and provides a fallback if recruitment is slow. The contribution becomes credible rather than inflated. ## Done - A proposal document contains a sourced gap, bounded question, justified method, governance, schedule, resources, risks, and contribution - A consistency check verifies that scope, claims, method, access, approvals, budget, and timeline agree
GitHubで見る