Skip to main content

write-a-research-proposal

Write a research proposal that connects a bounded gap to a justified method, ethics, data plan, schedule, resources, risks, and feasible contribution. Use when seeking approval, supervision, funding, or project direction.

来源信息

仓库
protosphinx/sphinxstack
最近来源活动
2026年7月29日 13:55
检测到的 SKILL.md 语言
英语
星标
3
Forks
0

安装方式

默认使用会先检查来源的 Prompt;你也可以切换为直接命令,或下载本地副本。

检查来源文件

决定是否安装前,请先阅读 SKILL.md,以及 SkillsMP 当前展示的配套文件。

文件资源管理器
2 个文件

正在显示 SKILL.md

SKILL.md
来源说明 · 只读预览
name
write-a-research-proposal
category
school
description
Write a research proposal that connects a bounded gap to a justified method, ethics, data plan, schedule, resources, risks, and feasible contribution. Use when seeking approval, supervision, funding, or project direction.
# write-a-research-proposal Make the proposed evidence capable of answering the stated question. ## When to use - Use for theses, dissertations, grants, capstones, independent studies, or internal research. - Do not claim approvals, access, partnerships, data, or results that have not been confirmed. ## Procedure 1. Confirm audience, format, evaluation criteria, word limit, deadline, and required attachments. 2. Define the problem, context, research gap, question, objectives, and practical or scholarly significance. 3. Synthesize the most relevant evidence and show where uncertainty remains without manufacturing novelty. 4. State conceptual framework, definitions, scope, and expected contribution. 5. Justify design, sampling, measures, procedure, analysis, quality controls, and alternatives. 6. Address ethics, consent, safety, privacy, data governance, inclusion, and required permissions. 7. Build a staged schedule with dependencies, review points, recruitment or access lead time, and contingency. 8. Estimate people, equipment, software, travel, participant, repository, and dissemination resources. 9. Record risks, feasibility evidence, limitations, fallback scope, and stopping conditions. 10. Cross-check question, method, budget, schedule, and claimed outputs for consistency. ## Worked example A proposal promises national conclusions from interviews at one accessible site. Review narrows the question to that setting, explains purposeful sampling, adds a transferability boundary, and provides a fallback if recruitment is slow. The contribution becomes credible rather than inflated. ## Done - A proposal document contains a sourced gap, bounded question, justified method, governance, schedule, resources, risks, and contribution - A consistency check verifies that scope, claims, method, access, approvals, budget, and timeline agree
在 GitHub 查看