Skip to main content

write-a-research-proposal

Write a research proposal that connects a bounded gap to a justified method, ethics, data plan, schedule, resources, risks, and feasible contribution. Use when seeking approval, supervision, funding, or project direction.

소스 정보

저장소
protosphinx/sphinxstack
최근 소스 활동
2026년 7월 29일 13:55
감지된 SKILL.md 언어
영어
스타
3
포크
0

설치 방법

기본적으로 소스를 먼저 확인하는 Prompt가 선택됩니다. 직접 명령으로 전환하거나 로컬 사본을 다운로드할 수도 있습니다.

소스 파일 검토

설치 여부를 결정하기 전에 SKILL.md와 SkillsMP에 표시된 보조 파일을 읽어 보세요.

파일 탐색기
2 개 파일

SKILL.md 표시 중

SKILL.md
소스 지침 · 읽기 전용 미리보기
name
write-a-research-proposal
category
school
description
Write a research proposal that connects a bounded gap to a justified method, ethics, data plan, schedule, resources, risks, and feasible contribution. Use when seeking approval, supervision, funding, or project direction.
# write-a-research-proposal Make the proposed evidence capable of answering the stated question. ## When to use - Use for theses, dissertations, grants, capstones, independent studies, or internal research. - Do not claim approvals, access, partnerships, data, or results that have not been confirmed. ## Procedure 1. Confirm audience, format, evaluation criteria, word limit, deadline, and required attachments. 2. Define the problem, context, research gap, question, objectives, and practical or scholarly significance. 3. Synthesize the most relevant evidence and show where uncertainty remains without manufacturing novelty. 4. State conceptual framework, definitions, scope, and expected contribution. 5. Justify design, sampling, measures, procedure, analysis, quality controls, and alternatives. 6. Address ethics, consent, safety, privacy, data governance, inclusion, and required permissions. 7. Build a staged schedule with dependencies, review points, recruitment or access lead time, and contingency. 8. Estimate people, equipment, software, travel, participant, repository, and dissemination resources. 9. Record risks, feasibility evidence, limitations, fallback scope, and stopping conditions. 10. Cross-check question, method, budget, schedule, and claimed outputs for consistency. ## Worked example A proposal promises national conclusions from interviews at one accessible site. Review narrows the question to that setting, explains purposeful sampling, adds a transferability boundary, and provides a fallback if recruitment is slow. The contribution becomes credible rather than inflated. ## Done - A proposal document contains a sourced gap, bounded question, justified method, governance, schedule, resources, risks, and contribution - A consistency check verifies that scope, claims, method, access, approvals, budget, and timeline agree
GitHub에서 보기