メニュー
Thinking frameworks for decisions and problem analysis. Use when evaluating options, root causes, or prioritizing.
デフォルトでは、最初にソースを確認する Prompt が選択されています。直接コマンドに切り替えるか、ローカルコピーをダウンロードすることもできます。
インストールを決める前に、SKILL.md と SkillsMP に表示されている付属ファイルをお読みください。
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
直接コマンドでは確認用 Prompt が省略されます。実行前にソースを確認してください。
npx skills add https://github.com/Tibsfox/gsd-skill-creator --skill decision-frameworkコマンドは1行のまま表示されます。コピー前に横へスクロールして全体を確認してください。
ローカルで確認しますか？SkillsMP が現在取得できるファイルをダウンロードできます。
Use the moment a request is underspecified and you are about to act on an ASSUMED goal. Enumerate the candidate goals the request could mean, project the action or artifact each one implies, and check whether they diverge: if two or more plausible goals lead to materially different actions or artifacts, ask exactly ONE targeted clarifying question; otherwise proceed on the most-likely goal and state the assumption in one line. Clarification is an evidence-producing action, not a delay — but one question, never an interrogation. Distinct from gsd-spec-phase (GSD-phase-bound, emits a heavy SPEC.md) and intent-router (fetch strategy, not goal disambiguation). Backed by agent goal-state inference (arxiv 2606.16813v1). Triggers on acting under an assumed goal when the request admits more than one materially different reading.
Use at write time to vector/embedding memory — Grove content-addressed insertion, chroma/pgvector upserts, memory-consolidation promoting session traces to MEMORY.md, or embedding externally-ingested content. Scores each candidate record against a fixed panel of sentinel queries and quarantines any record that would become the nearest neighbor of too many unrelated queries — a hub — whether from adversarial poisoning or accidental over-generality. This is the memory-record-side sibling of skill-injection-guardian (file-side) and the write-side complement of memory-use-warrant (read-side). Quarantine, never silently drop; a human reviews. Backed by the admission-time hubness gate (arxiv 2606.19692v1). Triggers on inserting into vector memory, consolidating memory, and embedding stranger content.
Run this appropriateness check the moment you are about to integrate a retrieved long-term memory — a Grove content-addressed hit, a chroma/pgvector neighbour, a memory-consolidation digest, or a MEMORY.md line — into a response, especially anything touching private origins, Fox Companies IP, credentials, or Center Camp / consent-governed content. It answers a question intent-router never asks: not WHAT to fetch or HOW, but WHETHER a correctly-retrieved item should reach output. Relevance is not appropriateness — a perfect similarity match can still be a boundary violation. Default is FAIL-CLOSED: if in-context authorization is uncertain, the memory may inform behaviour but must not be surfaced. Backed by RBI-Eval (arxiv 2606.06055v1). Triggers on surfacing recalled sensitive memory into a response.
SKILL.md を表示中
SOC 職業分類に基づく
| name | decision-framework |
| description | Thinking frameworks for decisions and problem analysis. Use when evaluating options, root causes, or prioritizing. |
| version | 1.0.0 |
| format | "2025-10-02T00:00:00.000Z" |
| triggers | ["evaluating options, root causes, or prioritizing"] |
| updated | "2026-04-25T00:00:00.000Z" |
| status | ACTIVE |
| Situation | Framework |
|---|---|
| Challenge assumptions | First Principles |
| Find root cause | 5 Whys |
| Prioritize tasks | Eisenhower Matrix |
| Focus effort | Pareto 80/20 |
| Identify risks | Inversion |
| Map consequences | Second-Order Thinking |
| Compare options | Decision Matrix |
First Principles: State problem → list assumptions → challenge each → identify fundamentals → build from truths.
5 Whys: State problem → ask "why?" iteratively → verify chain backwards → act on deepest cause.
Eisenhower: Urgent+Important (do), Not-Urgent+Important (schedule), Urgent+Not-Important (delegate), Neither (eliminate).
Pareto: List items → measure impact → sort → find ~20% driving ~80% → focus there.
Inversion: State goal → "what guarantees failure?" → list failure modes → invert into prevention.
Second-Order: Map effects → map what THOSE cause → find hidden costs → decide with full picture.
Decision Matrix: List options → weighted criteria → score each → sum → sanity check winner.
