メニュー
Thinking frameworks for decisions and problem analysis. Use when evaluating options, root causes, or prioritizing.
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
SOC 職業分類に基づく
Extract creative intent from images into executable build specs. Activates on images + build intent, "image to mission", "i2m", or capturing visual energy in code/design.
Unit Circle Laboratory + sc-dev-team autonomous mission control. Provides human-in-the-loop automation layer, pipeline management, context lifecycle, stuck-state prevention. UC re-execution series and dev branch milestones. Adapted from uc-lab pattern for code plan/execute/verify/complete. Auto-activates during UC milestone work; trigger: user says 'bring up the dev team'.
Generate intelligence briefings for the planning dashboard. Use this skill whenever a request file appears in `.planning/console/inbox/pending/` whose `type` field starts with `intelligence.` (refresh_briefing, triage_finding, snapshot_diff, investigate_section, dismiss_finding). The skill reads the per-project KB at `.gsd/intelligence/intelligence.db`, synthesizes a briefing with a causal hypothesis + acknowledged uncertainty + confidence label and ranked moves, then writes the result back to the KB. Always trigger this skill for these request types — do not generate briefings manually.
Sketched Isotropic Gaussian Regularization primitive. Scalar loss matching the embedding distribution to a standard-normal target via Cramér-Wold slicing and the Epps-Pulley empirical characteristic function test. Port of rbalestr-lab/lejepa (MIT). Default-off in v1.49.571.
Adversarial spec-compliance PR review — cross-references diffs against approved specs, verifies runtime claims against source, detects competing PRs, audits scope/convention compliance. Use before merging.
Pick among candidate outputs (code, configs, plans) by running them on diverse inputs and clustering by behavioural fingerprint, rather than by textual aggregation or log-probability. Activates when an executor returns multiple plausible candidates that need disambiguation, when output-majority voting would be the default choice, or when reviewing generated code that has not yet been validated. The 2026 evidence (Semantic Voting, arxiv 2605.08680v1) is that any execution-based selector dominates output-majority voting by 19-52pp; sketch-generated inputs beat random fuzz by 11.3pp. Triggers: "pick the best candidate", "majority vote on code", "select from N samples", "validate the generated output", "behavioural verification".
| name | decision-framework |
| description | Thinking frameworks for decisions and problem analysis. Use when evaluating options, root causes, or prioritizing. |
| version | 1.0.0 |
| format | "2025-10-02T00:00:00.000Z" |
| triggers | ["evaluating options, root causes, or prioritizing"] |
| updated | "2026-04-25T00:00:00.000Z" |
| status | ACTIVE |
| Situation | Framework |
|---|---|
| Challenge assumptions | First Principles |
| Find root cause | 5 Whys |
| Prioritize tasks | Eisenhower Matrix |
| Focus effort | Pareto 80/20 |
| Identify risks | Inversion |
| Map consequences | Second-Order Thinking |
| Compare options | Decision Matrix |
First Principles: State problem → list assumptions → challenge each → identify fundamentals → build from truths.
5 Whys: State problem → ask "why?" iteratively → verify chain backwards → act on deepest cause.
Eisenhower: Urgent+Important (do), Not-Urgent+Important (schedule), Urgent+Not-Important (delegate), Neither (eliminate).
Pareto: List items → measure impact → sort → find ~20% driving ~80% → focus there.
Inversion: State goal → "what guarantees failure?" → list failure modes → invert into prevention.
Second-Order: Map effects → map what THOSE cause → find hidden costs → decide with full picture.
Decision Matrix: List options → weighted criteria → score each → sum → sanity check winner.
