Skip to main content

judge-long-distance-military-campaign

Use when evaluating the feasibility of a long-distance surprise military attack. Assesses distance risks, intelligence reliability, supply line vulnerabilities, and contingency planning. Based on Qin's failed attack on Zheng as a cautionary example.

설치로 이동

소스 정보

저장소
baojie/shiji-kb
최근 소스 활동
2026년 3월 25일 08:27
감지된 SKILL.md 언어
영어
스타
3,339
포크
528

설치 방법

기본적으로 소스를 먼저 확인하는 Prompt가 선택됩니다. 직접 명령으로 전환하거나 로컬 사본을 다운로드할 수도 있습니다.

소스 파일 검토

설치 여부를 결정하기 전에 SKILL.md와 SkillsMP에 표시된 보조 파일을 읽어 보세요.

파일 탐색기
2 개 파일

SKILL.md 표시 중

SKILL.md
소스 지침 · 읽기 전용 미리보기
name
judge-long-distance-military-campaign
description
Use when evaluating the feasibility of a long-distance surprise military attack. Assesses distance risks, intelligence reliability, supply line vulnerabilities, and contingency planning. Based on Qin's failed attack on Zheng as a cautionary example.
# Judge Long-Distance Military Campaign ## Overview A framework for evaluating surprise attacks on distant targets, recognizing inherent risks. Based on the failed Qin attack on Zheng. ## Steps 1. **Receive Intelligence** - Evaluate claims about target vulnerability - Consider the reliability of informants 2. **Assess Distance Factors** - Calculate the distance to target - Consider how many territories must be crossed - Recognize that long-distance surprise attacks rarely succeed 3. **Consider Information Security** - If someone is selling intelligence, they might also sell to your enemy - Assume the target may already be warned 4. **Consult Experienced Advisors** - Seek opinions from those with military experience - Consider objections seriously rather than dismissing them 5. **Make the Decision** - Weigh potential gains against high risks - Consider alternatives 6. **Prepare Contingencies** - If proceeding, plan for discovery - Have alternative objectives if primary target is forewarned ## Warning Signs - Informants offering to betray their own state may be unreliable - Long supply lines through multiple states create vulnerabilities - Overconfidence in secrecy often leads to disaster ## Expected Outcomes - Avoided catastrophic defeats from overextended campaigns - Better allocation of military resources - Preserved forces for more achievable objectives ## Validation - Verify that intelligence sources were evaluated for reliability and potential double-dealing before committing forces - Confirm that experienced military advisors were consulted and their objections formally considered - Check that contingency plans with alternative objectives exist in case the primary target is forewarned
GitHub에서 보기