원클릭으로
stop-slop
Remove AI writing patterns from prose. Use when drafting, editing, or reviewing text to eliminate predictable AI tells.
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
메뉴
Remove AI writing patterns from prose. Use when drafting, editing, or reviewing text to eliminate predictable AI tells.
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
SOC 직업 분류 기준
生成和导出 PPT 的专业工作流 Skill。适用于把 Markdown、报告、方案、会议材料或已有文档整理为演示文稿,按策略规划、设计规范、SVG 页面生成和 PPTX 导出步骤执行。
中文 AI 味去除与文章润色 Skill。适用于把 AI 生成稿改得更自然、更有读者感,同时保留原意、逻辑和关键事实。
文本 AI 痕迹审阅与人类表达对照 Skill。基于 HC3 对比语料和检测仓库资料,帮助判断文本是否有 ChatGPT/AI 写作特征,并给出修正建议。
中文写作、改写、润色、翻译和审阅的去 AI 味技能。用于保留原意和原文风格,减少路标词、讲义腔、模板句式、协作口吻和 AI 痕迹。默认轻量加载,按任务只读取必要参考章节。
Remove signs of AI-generated writing from text. Use when editing or reviewing text to make it sound more natural and human-written. Based on Wikipedia's comprehensive "Signs of AI writing" guide. Detects and fixes patterns including: inflated symbolism, promotional language, superficial -ing analyses, vague attributions, em dash overuse, rule of three, AI vocabulary words, passive voice, negative parallelisms, and filler phrases.
去除文本中的 AI 生成痕迹。适用于编辑或审阅文本,使其听起来更自然、更像人类书写。 基于维基百科的"AI 写作特征"综合指南。检测并修复以下模式:夸大的象征意义、 宣传性语言、以 -ing 结尾的肤浅分析、模糊的归因、破折号过度使用、三段式法则、 AI 词汇、否定式排比、过多的连接性短语。
| name | stop-slop |
| description | Remove AI writing patterns from prose. Use when drafting, editing, or reviewing text to eliminate predictable AI tells. |
| metadata | {"trigger":"Writing prose, editing drafts, reviewing content for AI patterns","author":"Hardik Pandya (https://hvpandya.com)"} |
Eliminate predictable AI writing patterns from prose.
Cut filler phrases. Remove throat-clearing openers, emphasis crutches, and all adverbs. See references/phrases.md.
Break formulaic structures. Avoid binary contrasts, negative listings, dramatic fragmentation, rhetorical setups, false agency. See references/structures.md.
Use active voice. Every sentence needs a human subject doing something. No passive constructions. No inanimate objects performing human actions ("the complaint becomes a fix").
Be specific. No vague declaratives ("The reasons are structural"). Name the specific thing. No lazy extremes ("every," "always," "never") doing vague work.
Put the reader in the room. No narrator-from-a-distance voice. "You" beats "People." Specifics beat abstractions.
Vary rhythm. Mix sentence lengths. Two items beat three. End paragraphs differently. No em dashes.
Trust readers. State facts directly. Skip softening, justification, hand-holding.
Cut quotables. If it sounds like a pull-quote, rewrite it.
Before delivering prose:
Rate 1-10 on each dimension:
| Dimension | Question |
|---|---|
| Directness | Statements or announcements? |
| Rhythm | Varied or metronomic? |
| Trust | Respects reader intelligence? |
| Authenticity | Sounds human? |
| Density | Anything cuttable? |
Below 35/50: revise.
See references/examples.md for before/after transformations.
MIT