用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
直接命令不会经过审查 Prompt;运行前请先检查来源。
npx skills add https://github.com/jmagly/aiwg --skill tot-decide命令会保持在同一行。复制前请横向滚动并检查完整内容。
想先保存到本地?可下载 SkillsMP 当前能够提供的文件。
WCAG accessibility analysis for color palettes including contrast ratios, compliance checking, and remediation suggestions. Use when user needs to verify colors meet accessibility standards.
Generate, analyze, compare, export, and suggest color palettes using color theory. Use when user asks about colors, palettes, color schemes, or needs help choosing colors for a project.
Research current color trends from Pantone, architecture, film, and design. Use when user asks about trending colors, popular palettes, or wants research-backed color inspiration.
基于 SOC 职业分类
正在显示 SKILL.md
| namespace | aiwg |
| name | tot-decide |
| platforms | ["all"] |
| description | Evaluate architectural decisions using Tree of Thoughts exploration |
| commandHint | {"category":"architecture-quality"} |
Evaluate architectural decisions by generating and scoring k alternatives using the ToT methodology.
When invoked, perform structured Tree of Thoughts exploration for architecture decisions:
Parse Decision Context
.aiwg/requirements/nfr-modules/.aiwg/architecture/Load ToT Protocol
Define Evaluation Criteria
Generate Alternatives (k=3 default)
Score and Compare
Generate ADR
Output
.aiwg/architecture/[decision-context] - Description of the architectural decision (required)--alternatives [k] - Number of alternatives to generate (default: 3, max: 7)--depth [levels] - Depth of exploration per alternative (default: 2)--output [path] - Custom output path for ADR (default: .aiwg/architecture/)--criteria [list] - Override criteria (comma-separated)--quick - Skip detailed analysis, produce summary matrix only/tot-decide "Select authentication approach for multi-tenant SaaS platform"
Output:
Tree of Thoughts Decision Analysis
===================================
Decision: Authentication approach for multi-tenant SaaS
Criteria (from NFRs):
Security [30%] - Multi-tenant isolation required
Scalability [25%] - 10K+ tenants expected
Cost [20%] - Startup budget constraints
Dev Speed [15%] - MVP in 3 months
Maintenance [10%] - Small ops team
Alternatives Generated:
A: OAuth2 + OIDC with tenant-scoped JWTs
B: Session-based with Redis cluster per tenant
C: API key + HMAC with per-request validation
Scoring Matrix:
| Criterion | Wt | A | B | C |
|---------------|-----|------|------|------|
| Security | 30% | 5 | 4 | 3 |
| Scalability | 25% | 5 | 3 | 4 |
| Cost | 20% | 3 | 2 | 5 |
| Dev Speed | 15% | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| Maintenance | 10% | 4 | 2 | 4 |
| Weighted | | 4.15 | 3.10 | 4.00 |
Recommendation: Option A (OAuth2 + OIDC)
Confidence: HIGH (gap > 0.5 from runner-up)
Trade-off accepted: Higher initial dev cost for superior security/scale
ADR saved: .aiwg/architecture/adr-auth-approach.md
/tot-decide "Database for event sourcing" --alternatives 4 --quick
/tot-decide "Microservices vs modular monolith" --depth 3 --criteria "scalability,team-autonomy,ops-complexity,latency"