菜单
Content review skill - AI predicts questions, multi-dimensional review, quantitative scoring, provides improvement suggestions.
默认使用会先检查来源的 Prompt；你也可以切换为直接命令，或下载本地副本。
决定是否安装前，请先阅读 SKILL.md，以及 SkillsMP 当前展示的配套文件。
基于 SOC 职业分类
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt，粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里，让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
直接命令不会经过审查 Prompt；运行前请先检查来源。
npx skills add https://github.com/spencerkit/spencergo-marketplace --skill writing-review命令会保持在同一行。复制前请横向滚动并检查完整内容。
想先保存到本地？可下载 SkillsMP 当前能够提供的文件。
正在显示 SKILL.md
End-to-end Chinese web novel production workflow for turning a novel idea into a structured deliverable project. Covers hot-search and trend scan, discovery discussion, requirement intake, market/topic analysis, title confirmation, story planning, outline design, character bible creation, chapter drafting, polishing, proofreading, final review, and optional Feishu Wiki sync. Use when the user wants to create, develop, optimize, or deliver a serialized novel, web fiction project, long-form Chinese fiction pipeline, or a full novel production workflow from concept to manuscript.
Structured topic research and multi-angle analysis for a user-provided topic, market, trend, concept, project, platform, industry, or content direction. Use when the user asks to research, investigate, analyze, study, or survey a topic and expects more than a simple search result dump, including multi-round retrieval, source comparison, dimension-based analysis, opportunity/risk assessment, and a clear research summary.
Multi-language code review skill with security audit and performance optimization suggestions
| name | writing-review |
| description | Content review skill - AI predicts questions, multi-dimensional review, quantitative scoring, provides improvement suggestions. |
Standalone content review module:
/spencergo:writing-review
Or provide content:
| Check | Description |
|---|---|
| Clear viewpoint | Is main point clear? |
| Sufficient evidence | Enough support for arguments? |
| Logical flow | Smooth transitions between paragraphs? |
| Check | Description |
|---|---|
| Concepts explained | Unexplained technical terms? |
| Difficulty match | Match reader level? |
| Predicted questions | What questions might readers have? |
| Check | Description |
|---|---|
| Attraction | Opening hook? |
| Empathy | Connect with reader? |
| Memorable | Any memorable points? |
| Check | Description |
|---|---|
| Opening | Hook to continue reading? |
| Transitions | Natural between sections? |
| Ending | Strong conclusion? |
Same as writing-content self-check
Based on content, predict 3-5 questions readers might ask
Compare content against questions Mark answered/unanswered
Check each dimension
Score each dimension
List issues + improvement directions
Each dimension 1-5:
| Score | Description |
|---|---|
| 5 | Excellent |
| 4 | Good |
| 3 | Acceptable |
| 2 | Needs improvement |
| 1 | Serious issues |
| Dimension | Weight |
|---|---|
| Logic | 25% |
| Reader perspective | 25% |
| Emotion | 20% |
| Structure | 15% |
| AI patterns | 15% |
| Dimension | Score |
|---|---|
| Logic | 4/5 |
| Reader perspective | 3/5 |
| Emotion | 4/5 |
| Structure | 5/5 |
| AI patterns | 3/5 |
| Total | 3.8/5 |
Total: X.X / 5.0
Need me to make changes based on suggestions?
---
## 5. Review Types
| Type | Description |
|------|-------------|
| Full review | All dimensions |
| Focused review | Specific dimensions only |
| Quick review | Key issues only |
---
## Next Step Guide (MUST FOLLOW)
When user confirms the review, you MUST guide them to the polish phase:
1. Tell user: "Review complete. Moving to polish phase."
2. Use Skill tool to invoke /spencergo:writing-polish
3. Pass context: review report and suggestions
User can say:
- "continue" / "next" / "polish"