메뉴
Content review skill - AI predicts questions, multi-dimensional review, quantitative scoring, provides improvement suggestions.
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
SOC 직업 분류 기준
End-to-end Chinese web novel production workflow for turning a novel idea into a structured deliverable project. Covers hot-search and trend scan, discovery discussion, requirement intake, market/topic analysis, title confirmation, story planning, outline design, character bible creation, chapter drafting, polishing, proofreading, final review, and optional Feishu Wiki sync. Use when the user wants to create, develop, optimize, or deliver a serialized novel, web fiction project, long-form Chinese fiction pipeline, or a full novel production workflow from concept to manuscript.
Structured topic research and multi-angle analysis for a user-provided topic, market, trend, concept, project, platform, industry, or content direction. Use when the user asks to research, investigate, analyze, study, or survey a topic and expects more than a simple search result dump, including multi-round retrieval, source comparison, dimension-based analysis, opportunity/risk assessment, and a clear research summary.
Multi-language code review skill with security audit and performance optimization suggestions
Content writing skill - writes based on outline, real-time style comparison, embedded self-check, supports multiple writing rhythms.
Outline generation skill - generates structured outlines based on requirements, provides content type structure library and smart recommendations.
Polish skill - rewrite/optimize/proofread/de-AI-ify. Provides enhanced AI detection and optimization direction refinement.
| name | writing-review |
| description | Content review skill - AI predicts questions, multi-dimensional review, quantitative scoring, provides improvement suggestions. |
Standalone content review module:
/spencergo:writing-review
Or provide content:
| Check | Description |
|---|---|
| Clear viewpoint | Is main point clear? |
| Sufficient evidence | Enough support for arguments? |
| Logical flow | Smooth transitions between paragraphs? |
| Check | Description |
|---|---|
| Concepts explained | Unexplained technical terms? |
| Difficulty match | Match reader level? |
| Predicted questions | What questions might readers have? |
| Check | Description |
|---|---|
| Attraction | Opening hook? |
| Empathy | Connect with reader? |
| Memorable | Any memorable points? |
| Check | Description |
|---|---|
| Opening | Hook to continue reading? |
| Transitions | Natural between sections? |
| Ending | Strong conclusion? |
Same as writing-content self-check
Based on content, predict 3-5 questions readers might ask
Compare content against questions Mark answered/unanswered
Check each dimension
Score each dimension
List issues + improvement directions
Each dimension 1-5:
| Score | Description |
|---|---|
| 5 | Excellent |
| 4 | Good |
| 3 | Acceptable |
| 2 | Needs improvement |
| 1 | Serious issues |
| Dimension | Weight |
|---|---|
| Logic | 25% |
| Reader perspective | 25% |
| Emotion | 20% |
| Structure | 15% |
| AI patterns | 15% |
| Dimension | Score |
|---|---|
| Logic | 4/5 |
| Reader perspective | 3/5 |
| Emotion | 4/5 |
| Structure | 5/5 |
| AI patterns | 3/5 |
| Total | 3.8/5 |
Total: X.X / 5.0
Need me to make changes based on suggestions?
---
## 5. Review Types
| Type | Description |
|------|-------------|
| Full review | All dimensions |
| Focused review | Specific dimensions only |
| Quick review | Key issues only |
---
## Next Step Guide (MUST FOLLOW)
When user confirms the review, you MUST guide them to the polish phase:
1. Tell user: "Review complete. Moving to polish phase."
2. Use Skill tool to invoke /spencergo:writing-polish
3. Pass context: review report and suggestions
User can say:
- "continue" / "next" / "polish"