writing-review

name	writing-review
description	Content review skill - AI predicts questions, multi-dimensional review, quantitative scoring, provides improvement suggestions.

Writing Review

Overview

Standalone content review module:

1. AI predicts reader questions
2. Multi-dimensional review (logic/reader perspective/emotion/structure/AI痕迹)
3. Quantitative scoring
4. Improvement suggestions

Usage

/spencergo:writing-review

Or provide content:

• "Help me review this article: {content}"
• "Any issues with this piece?"

---

1. Review Dimensions

1.1 Logic Completeness

Check	Description
Clear viewpoint	Is main point clear?
Sufficient evidence	Enough support for arguments?
Logical flow	Smooth transitions between paragraphs?

1.2 Reader Perspective

Check	Description
Concepts explained	Unexplained technical terms?
Difficulty match	Match reader level?
Predicted questions	What questions might readers have?

1.3 Emotional Resonance

Check	Description
Attraction	Opening hook?
Empathy	Connect with reader?
Memorable	Any memorable points?

1.4 Structure

Check	Description
Opening	Hook to continue reading?
Transitions	Natural between sections?
Ending	Strong conclusion?

1.5 AI Pattern Detection

Same as writing-content self-check

---

2. Review Process

Step 1: AI Predicts Questions

Based on content, predict 3-5 questions readers might ask

Step 2: Check Coverage

Compare content against questions Mark answered/unanswered

Step 3: Multi-dimensional Review

Check each dimension

Step 4: Quantitative Scoring

Score each dimension

Step 5: Improvement Suggestions

List issues + improvement directions

---

3. Quantitative Scoring

Scoring Standard

Each dimension 1-5:

Score	Description
5	Excellent
4	Good
3	Acceptable
2	Needs improvement
1	Serious issues

Dimensions

Dimension	Weight
Logic	25%
Reader perspective	25%
Emotion	20%
Structure	15%
AI patterns	15%

Scoring Output

Review Result

Overall Score

Dimension	Score
Logic	4/5
Reader perspective	3/5
Emotion	4/5
Structure	5/5
AI patterns	3/5
Total	3.8/5

Question Check

1. Question 1 - ✓ Answered
2. Question 2 - ✓ Answered
3. Question 3 - ✗ Not fully answered

Issues

1. [Medium] Some transitions not smooth
2. [Low] Could add more examples

Suggestions

• Suggest adding real example in Chapter 2
• Opening could be more engaging

---

4. Review Output Format

Review Complete

Score

Total: X.X / 5.0

Main Issues

1. xxx
2. xxx

Suggestions

1. xxx
2. xxx

---

Need me to make changes based on suggestions?

---

## 5. Review Types

| Type | Description |
|------|-------------|
| Full review | All dimensions |
| Focused review | Specific dimensions only |
| Quick review | Key issues only |

---

## Next Step Guide (MUST FOLLOW)

When user confirms the review, you MUST guide them to the polish phase:

1. Tell user: "Review complete. Moving to polish phase."
2. Use Skill tool to invoke /spencergo:writing-polish
3. Pass context: review report and suggestions

User can say:
- "continue" / "next" / "polish"