| name | writing-review |
| description | Content review skill - AI predicts questions, multi-dimensional review, quantitative scoring, provides improvement suggestions. |
Writing Review
Overview
Standalone content review module:
- AI predicts reader questions
- Multi-dimensional review (logic/reader perspective/emotion/structure/AI痕迹)
- Quantitative scoring
- Improvement suggestions
Usage
/spencergo:writing-review
Or provide content:
- "Help me review this article: {content}"
- "Any issues with this piece?"
1. Review Dimensions
1.1 Logic Completeness
| Check | Description |
|---|
| Clear viewpoint | Is main point clear? |
| Sufficient evidence | Enough support for arguments? |
| Logical flow | Smooth transitions between paragraphs? |
1.2 Reader Perspective
| Check | Description |
|---|
| Concepts explained | Unexplained technical terms? |
| Difficulty match | Match reader level? |
| Predicted questions | What questions might readers have? |
1.3 Emotional Resonance
| Check | Description |
|---|
| Attraction | Opening hook? |
| Empathy | Connect with reader? |
| Memorable | Any memorable points? |
1.4 Structure
| Check | Description |
|---|
| Opening | Hook to continue reading? |
| Transitions | Natural between sections? |
| Ending | Strong conclusion? |
1.5 AI Pattern Detection
Same as writing-content self-check
2. Review Process
Step 1: AI Predicts Questions
Based on content, predict 3-5 questions readers might ask
Step 2: Check Coverage
Compare content against questions
Mark answered/unanswered
Step 3: Multi-dimensional Review
Check each dimension
Step 4: Quantitative Scoring
Score each dimension
Step 5: Improvement Suggestions
List issues + improvement directions
3. Quantitative Scoring
Scoring Standard
Each dimension 1-5:
| Score | Description |
|---|
| 5 | Excellent |
| 4 | Good |
| 3 | Acceptable |
| 2 | Needs improvement |
| 1 | Serious issues |
Dimensions
| Dimension | Weight |
|---|
| Logic | 25% |
| Reader perspective | 25% |
| Emotion | 20% |
| Structure | 15% |
| AI patterns | 15% |
Scoring Output
Review Result
Overall Score
| Dimension | Score |
|---|
| Logic | 4/5 |
| Reader perspective | 3/5 |
| Emotion | 4/5 |
| Structure | 5/5 |
| AI patterns | 3/5 |
| Total | 3.8/5 |
Question Check
- Question 1 - ✓ Answered
- Question 2 - ✓ Answered
- Question 3 - ✗ Not fully answered
Issues
- [Medium] Some transitions not smooth
- [Low] Could add more examples
Suggestions
- Suggest adding real example in Chapter 2
- Opening could be more engaging
4. Review Output Format
Review Complete
Score
Total: X.X / 5.0
Main Issues
- xxx
- xxx
Suggestions
- xxx
- xxx
Need me to make changes based on suggestions?
---
## 5. Review Types
| Type | Description |
|------|-------------|
| Full review | All dimensions |
| Focused review | Specific dimensions only |
| Quick review | Key issues only |
---
## Next Step Guide (MUST FOLLOW)
When user confirms the review, you MUST guide them to the polish phase:
1. Tell user: "Review complete. Moving to polish phase."
2. Use Skill tool to invoke /spencergo:writing-polish
3. Pass context: review report and suggestions
User can say:
- "continue" / "next" / "polish"
