cursor-debate

# Cursor Debate ## Overview Structure an evidence-based “debate round” to surface ideas and trade-offs; the debate does not decide, it informs the human decision-maker. ## Workflow ### 1) Define the question - Write the precise decision question (1 sentence). ### 2) Choose candidates - Include 3–6 perspectives total. - Human personas (pragmatist, architect, researcher, integrator, tool builder) - Optional “code entity” personas (actual modules/symbols), backed by real file evidence ### 3) Research first (required) - For each candidate, list questions they need answered. - Run concrete repo inspection (examples): - `rg -n "..."`, `git grep`, `git log -p -- <path>`, `go test ./...`, etc. - Record commands + key outputs in “Pre-Debate Research”. ### 4) Debate round - Opening statements (Round 1) - Rebuttals (Round 2) - Moderator summary (tensions, trade-offs, open questions) ## Output template Use the canonical outline in `references/debate.md`.